The president’s anger was fueled by reports that the subpoenas were for obtaining information about his business dealings with Deutsche Bank, according to interviews with eight White House officials, people close to the president and others familiar with the episode. To Mr. Trump, the subpoenas suggested that Mr. Mueller had expanded the investigation in a way that crossed the “red line” he had set last year in an interview with The New York Times.

In the hours that followed Mr. Trump’s initial anger over the Deutsche Bank reports, his lawyers and advisers worked quickly to learn about the subpoenas, and ultimately were told by Mr. Mueller’s office that the reports were not accurate, leading the president to back down.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3823728&forum_id=2),#35811798)

this surely proves RUSSIA collusion

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3823728&forum_id=2),#34882175)

And in so doing Trump is a Russian agent and because of that leverage Putin forced Trump to run a longshot against all odds presidential campaign where he beat the entire Republican field then the all but POTUS presumptive Hillary Clinton?

Just trying to level set what the accusation here is

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3823728&forum_id=2),#34882203)

RuskovitzBank!?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3823728&forum_id=2),#34882406)

Several news outlets, including Bloomberg and The Wall Street Journal, also inaccurately reported this week that Deutsche Bank had received a subpoena from the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, for President Trump’s financial records.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3823728&forum_id=2),#34882838)

Email collusion, fake.

Candidate Trump directed contact with Russians, fake.

Deutshe Bank subpoanas, fake.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3823728&forum_id=2),#34882881)

even if this is true what do you think will happen? let's say mueller who is supposed to investigate issues related to election nails trump for tax evasion and money laundering for say 2007/2008. Obviously there will be NO criminal charges or indictment as long as he is president (DOJ cant prosecute president) unlike say for Manafort. Mueller would indicate that he should be charged in his report.

what happens next? you think GOP with all we know about Mueller is going to impeach Trump for non political shit that happened even before he ran for president? especially when the same FBI gave a clean chit to Hillary after all her fuckups as SoS.

Nixon was impeached for stuff he did when he was a president and for which there was a smoking gun tape and only after he lost his base. until then congress couldnt do shit despite him openly firing multiple AGs and the first special prosecutor. and Trump will NEVER EVER lose his base. he could tie up Mueller in oval office and take a shit on him on live TV and he will still have his base

worst case scenario for Trump with this Mueller shit - Kushner indictment, Mueller says he committed money laundering blah blah, impeachment fails bcos GOP controls senate and/or house

good luck

EDIT: If anything Mueller would completely destroy the credibility of his investigation (like Starr) if the only shit he can come up with predates the election and will be looked at as another partisan hack

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3823728&forum_id=2),#34882916)

GTFO here

Look at Menendez for example. he was literally indicted for shit he did in office and went to trial and is still a senator. you think GOP can impeach Trump for shit he did before 2010 when they have a sitting senator with criminal bribery indictment?

you have lost all credibility with your analysis of what will happen even if Mueller manages to make a credible case (allegations at this point) of financial crimes before 2015. trump would deny, GOP would say it has nothing to do with his political career/POTUS and that he should have his day in court after presidency and is entitled to due process, dems will be OUTRAGED AS FUCK and keep trying impeachment and Trump will (hopefully) get reelected

you are just a pathetic delusional mentally ill liberal. its sad and also terrible that there is literally no sane, fair lib on XO (or IRL) anymore

Trump is your president at least till Jan 2020. Only God can change that. deal with it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3823728&forum_id=2),#34883006)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/house-majority-leader-to-colleagues-in-2016-i-think-putin-pays-trump/2017/05/17/515f6f8a-3aff-11e7-8854-21f359183e8c_story.html

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3823728&forum_id=2),#34883816)

Ryan & Reince also willingly worked hand in hand with Manafort to block a convention coup attempt:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/18/politics/rnc-procedural-votes-rules-committee/index.html

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3823728&forum_id=2),#34887264)

http://www.nytimes.com/1989/06/21/us/a-political-power-broker.html

http://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,960803-1,00.html

Trump met Roger Stone in the first place at a major Reagan fundraiser in 1980s Manhattan, that's how Trump became his client. Manafort's firm was basically to Reagan/Bush what Podesta was to the Clintons, except it was an even bigger operation and much more influential. Atwater went from a partner at the firm to RNC chairman.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3823728&forum_id=2),#34893651)

If this is normal business for the GOP, why would they be shocked?

You were the HERbot, not me, in every 2016 thread, you were the one constantly bringing up that if republicans had nominated anyone other than Trump they would've won. I said they would've lost, because of angry disenfranchised Trump voters/potential 3rd party. You spent the entire time saying Trump was going to lose, I never did that, I never defended Hillary, I only attacked other republicans.

You think that's a controversial position, but you also think Bernie would've beaten Trump you BERNIEbot/HIMbot. I'm sure Bernie's praise of Castro would have gone over well with FL. Cubans retard. lol

You were the one actually defending HER v. Trump. You were and you REMAIN literally OBSESSED with HER.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3823728&forum_id=2),#34899534)

https://twitter.com/sppeoples/status/872823328284839937

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3823728&forum_id=2),#42624531)

Thank

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3823728&forum_id=2),#42623164)