Why did Hillary refuse to go to "Wisconsin" ?
| big-titted spot newt | 06/28/22 | | Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e | 07/17/26 | | Brilliant keepsake machete | 06/28/22 | | big-titted spot newt | 06/28/22 | | big-titted spot newt | 06/28/22 | | big-titted spot newt | 06/28/22 | | Cracking Halford Temple | 06/28/22 | | big-titted spot newt | 06/28/22 | | honey-headed aphrodisiac internal respiration national | 06/28/22 | | razzmatazz lime principal's office | 06/28/22 | | Floppy Field | 06/28/22 | | poppy buck-toothed whorehouse | 06/28/22 | | Bearded House | 06/28/22 | | big locale private investor | 06/28/22 | | confused arousing cruise ship | 06/28/22 | | cerebral site | 06/28/22 | | Vengeful orchestra pit | 06/28/22 | | Gaped stead mad cow disease | 06/28/22 | | Spectacular Deer Antler | 06/28/22 | | french exhilarant dragon love of her life | 06/28/22 | | wonderful ebony weed whacker place of business | 06/28/22 | | Charismatic Tank | 06/28/22 | | big-titted spot newt | 07/08/22 | | big-titted spot newt | 10/18/22 | | big-titted spot newt | 10/26/22 | | big-titted spot newt | 11/19/22 | | big-titted spot newt | 01/21/23 | | marvelous harsh stag film idiot | 01/21/23 | | big-titted spot newt | 01/21/23 | | big-titted spot newt | 09/12/23 | | big-titted spot newt | 09/16/23 | | crystalline property | 09/06/24 | | Jade office persian | 09/06/24 | | big-titted spot newt | 10/18/24 | | razzmatazz lime principal's office | 10/18/24 | | big-titted spot newt | 04/19/25 | | big-titted spot newt | 04/27/25 | | big-titted spot newt | 11/21/25 | | Brilliant keepsake machete | 11/21/25 | | razzmatazz lime principal's office | 11/21/25 | | Adventurous metal theatre | 06/28/22 | | multi-colored bronze native | 10/27/22 | | Sadistic library boiling water | 06/28/22 | | stimulating shivering tattoo shrine | 06/28/22 | | Tan medicated chapel puppy | 06/28/22 | | mahogany immigrant | 10/18/22 | | dark sexy corner elastic band | 09/16/23 | | big-titted spot newt | 09/06/24 | | big-titted spot newt | 09/06/24 | | big-titted spot newt | 09/06/24 | | razzmatazz lime principal's office | 10/18/24 | | razzmatazz lime principal's office | 11/21/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 28th, 2022 1:13 AM Author: Brilliant keepsake machete
Brooklyn grew weary of endless field requests for signs and pamphlets, and insisted that big data would win the state for Clinton.
"I don't want to hear any more crap about volunteers or door knocking in Wisconsin, okay?" snapped an angry Mook after a particularly heated conference call. "The computer says Wisconsin is solid blue, got it? Solid blue!" he yelled.
Others were horrified when Mook sank $1.7 million into an app designed to energize the transgender vote in California, a state where Clinton already held an enormous lead. After Trump's election, it was revealed that the app yielded only eighteen new voter registrations, or approximately $94,000 per vote.
http://politico.com/election2016/mook-and-dnc-were-overconfident-from-the-start.htm
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5141308&forum_id=2)#44757342) |
Date: September 6th, 2024 1:20 PM Author: big-titted spot newt
Mainlining’s use of quotes around “Wisconsin” is intriguing, and it feels like a subtle or ironic jab. The quotes might imply that "Wisconsin" represents something larger, perhaps a symbol of the Clinton campaign’s perceived neglect of key battleground states. By using quotes, Mainlining could be suggesting that the campaign viewed Wisconsin as a kind of abstract, irrelevant place—almost fictional in their strategy. Alternatively, it might play into a broader skepticism, implying the Clinton campaign treated Wisconsin's political importance as something unreal, which could reflect how the state was overlooked in her campaign.
As for Evan39’s fictional news excerpt, the humor lies in its clever satire of what some perceived as the mismanagement of Clinton's 2016 campaign. Evan39 captures this by caricaturing campaign manager Robby Mook, portraying him as overly reliant on data and dismissive of grassroots efforts. The line “The computer says Wisconsin is solid blue, got it? Solid blue!” mocks the overconfidence some believed the campaign had in their analytics, while ignoring more practical, boots-on-the-ground campaigning.
The exaggerated detail about spending $1.7 million on an app to mobilize the transgender vote in California—a state Clinton already dominated—amplifies the absurdity. It underscores Evan39’s critique that resources were wasted on areas that didn’t need attention, at the expense of battleground states like Wisconsin. The $94,000-per-vote calculation is an over-the-top punchline, heightening the absurdity and inefficiency.
Evan39’s fake hyperlink at the end—“http://politico.com/election2016/mook-and-dnc-were-overconfident-from-the-start.htm”—is a signature move of his, giving the post a veneer of authenticity while letting the reader know it’s entirely fabricated. It mirrors the way headlines might sound in real outlets like Politico or The New York Times, but it's his way of slyly blending fiction with the style of real reporting.
Overall, both Mainlining and Evan39 are tapping into a shared skepticism and dark humor surrounding the 2016 election, with each using different tools to express their critique.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5141308&forum_id=2)#48056876) |
|
|