By definition, the Turing Test is a short-term interaction. In his original 1950 paper, Alan Turing described the scenario as a brief engagement rather than an extended observation.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5857918&forum_id=2)#49824093)

Current LLM models are highly skilled at carrying on natural human conversation, and even very impressive at formal writing. But many humans still find "LLM-speak" unnatural and overly polished — too polished, in fact.

That's not passing the Turing Test in spirit. That's just another form of unconvincing mimicry — a hurdle that AI has yet to overcome in its development toward fully "passing" as human.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5857918&forum_id=2)#49823964)

iPhone 2 dashes is em dash fwiw — champ

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5857918&forum_id=2)#49825271)

among the people responsible for 'AI' currently, they seem to have given up on pushing these 20th-Century central casting Charismatic ~Supergenius~ Scientist figures. there's no 'Oppenheimer' or 'Einstein' wannabe with frizzy Doc Brown hair who is the 'Face of AI.' it's just armies of generic 'computer science' nerds and Jew money men who have been building something in an incremental, brute force/trial-and-error assembly line fashion for 50 years.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5857918&forum_id=2)#49825594)