Why is the "manosphere" obsessed with the Lindsay Clancy trial again?
| Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband | 09/01/26 | | Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband | 09/03/26 | | Wilbur in the Godhead | 09/03/26 | | Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband | 09/03/26 | | Wilbur in the Godhead | 09/03/26 | | jon bernthal | 09/03/26 | | Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband | 09/03/26 | | jon bernthal | 09/03/26 | | gibberish (?) | 09/03/26 | | Richard Ames | 09/03/26 | | .,.,.;;,;.,;:,:,,:,.,:,::,..;.,:,.:;.:.,;.:.,:.::, | 09/03/26 | | Debunked antisemitic trope | 09/03/26 | | Richard Ames | 09/03/26 | | Debunked antisemitic trope | 09/03/26 | | Richard Ames | 09/03/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 3rd, 2026 5:36 PM Author: jon bernthal
Didnt even really follow the trial
Noticing a mass of vocal women "relating" to a bumpersticker insane nurse whore who killed her children really evinces the current mental panoply of 'Women'
They have no values, will simply defend any behavior or action, with the lowest level of crass self interest, out of simple spite, lazines & histrionics
Its not about "mental health/sanity" which would honestly be quite banal, but about women's agency and ability to exert power with no consequences at every level in society.
They've won on every front in modernity, in work, marriage, now at the criminal level women want zero accountability or culpability, everything can be endlessly relitigated around their feelings at any given time
When it comes to things they want, they have agency & are 100% beyond reproach, theres no paternalism,
but should anything go wrong or they realize they can leverage a better outcome in some arena, they can always flip the switch and be absolved of any responsibility/culpability, wider accountability by deciding, they have all/no agency in xyz situation, such as pregnancy, dating, child rearing, any activity they decide doesnt adhoc suit them
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899748&forum_id=2).#50114118) |
Date: September 3rd, 2026 6:57 PM
Author: .,.,.;;,;.,;:,:,,:,.,:,::,..;.,:,.:;.:.,;.:.,:.::,
what's the manosphere?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899748&forum_id=2).#50114329) |
Date: September 3rd, 2026 7:13 PM Author: Debunked antisemitic trope
I think what's wild about this case is that she didn't kill an abusive spouse. She killed defenseless children.
Guy above is 💯 right imo. This is about making sure women have no accountability, responsibility, or agency.
It's FLM
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899748&forum_id=2).#50114363) |
 |
Date: September 3rd, 2026 7:34 PM Author: Richard Ames
It has been argued that the industrial revolution started in England because they spent (possibly) hundreds of years regularly culling their population by simply killing the serious criminals off. They basically eliminated all the mutants from the population, many of whom were likely "insane" by today's standards.
I say this because I don't personally find your POV on this to be crazy. Obviously violent criminals need to be dealt with - with no remorse whatsoever. But this idea of "oh I was insane at the time haha" could only exist in a society that has fundamentally given up.
More to your point, there is something more distressing in this case versus two niggas that had beef over a drug deal gone wrong and it ended in a killing or whatever.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899748&forum_id=2).#50114437) |
|
|