Cons what the fuck is "absolute immunity?" Is that a legal concept?
| exciting meetinghouse | 01/08/26 | | Appetizing slap-happy shrine | 01/08/26 | | exciting meetinghouse | 01/08/26 | | Appetizing slap-happy shrine | 01/08/26 | | exciting meetinghouse | 01/08/26 | | idiotic glassy menage old irish cottage | 01/08/26 | | exciting meetinghouse | 01/08/26 | | idiotic glassy menage old irish cottage | 01/08/26 | | exciting meetinghouse | 01/08/26 | | Swashbuckling really tough guy | 01/08/26 | | azure black woman | 01/08/26 | | Gaped Odious Newt Parlour | 01/08/26 | | exciting meetinghouse | 01/08/26 | | Harsh stead scourge upon the earth | 01/08/26 | | exciting meetinghouse | 01/08/26 | | Harsh stead scourge upon the earth | 01/08/26 | | exciting meetinghouse | 01/08/26 | | Harsh stead scourge upon the earth | 01/08/26 | | exciting meetinghouse | 01/08/26 | | Harsh stead scourge upon the earth | 01/08/26 | | exciting meetinghouse | 01/08/26 | | Harsh stead scourge upon the earth | 01/08/26 | | exciting meetinghouse | 01/08/26 | | Harsh stead scourge upon the earth | 01/09/26 | | exciting meetinghouse | 01/09/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 8th, 2026 8:33 PM Author: Harsh stead scourge upon the earth
i'm not sure you and i are focusing on the key issue.
absolute immunity becomes an issue when someone arguably fucks up. it doesn't become an issue when someone follows policy.
so if a judge makes a massively erroneous ruling but wasn't bribed, etc., then it was within the scope of the job but was outside policy -- and the judge gets absolute immunity.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5819258&forum_id=2).#49573986) |
|
|