The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Not a single poa about S&C requiring 5x/week RTO. Not surprising, just...*sigh*
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 8th, 2025 4:18 PM Author: Jonald J. Trump (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5661000&forum_id=2).#48532756) |
 |
Date: January 9th, 2025 1:48 PM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., actually, there was:
http://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5648795&mc=19&forum_id=2#48530149 |
Date: January 8th, 2025 4:23 PM Author: Bill DaWall Imagine some brocolli haired zoomer fag filming Managing Partner Hyman Weinstein or HR Sutherland III asking why you have to be in the office to fiddle around with form documents and change the names of businesses while the partners huff and puff and threaten the zoomer with the catastrophic loss of thousands of dollars. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5661000&forum_id=2).#48532783) |
|
Date: January 8th, 2025 4:28 PM Author: Tutu-fueled Red PissWang Rampage (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5661000&forum_id=2).#48532811) |
|
Date: January 9th, 2025 6:37 AM Author: ADA-compliant Monkey Bars (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5661000&forum_id=2).#48534950) |
|
Date: January 8th, 2025 4:24 PM Author: internet guy im sure top law schools is all over it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5661000&forum_id=2).#48532790) |
|
Date: January 8th, 2025 4:26 PM Author: UN peacekeeper what does the last item mean? S&C moves to full RTO, lawyers expected to be in office 5x a week Other details of the new policy:
-Remote work generally only permitted if an associate is eligible to adopt a flexible-time schedule
-Managing partner approval is needed for remote work arrangements. Max of 1x per week for a maximum of 6 months.
-Junior lawyers “generally will not be authorized to work remotely”
-Compensation and vacation time will be docked if you work a number of client hours less than a full-time schedule while working remotely |
|
Date: January 8th, 2025 4:28 PM Author: Jonald J. Trump reading comp? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5661000&forum_id=2).#48532809) |
|
Date: January 8th, 2025 4:47 PM Author: UN peacekeeper more aspie than dumb (perfect RC score on LSAT) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5661000&forum_id=2).#48532919) |
|
Date: January 8th, 2025 4:52 PM Author: Jonald J. Trump (guy about to do the WUSTL) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5661000&forum_id=2).#48532941) |
|
Date: January 9th, 2025 1:48 PM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., i asked this same Q yesterday: http://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5648795&mc=19&forum_id=2#48530149 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5661000&forum_id=2).#48536380) |
|
Date: January 9th, 2025 2:21 PM Author: UN peacekeeper With great effort i turned off my aspie and now understand. If an in-office worker misses target hours they still get normal pay (but presumably bonus is jeopardized) but a remote worker with the same low hours will get doct. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5661000&forum_id=2).#48536560) |
|
Date: January 9th, 2025 2:25 PM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., i'm not even convinced it says this.
and even if it does, i'm pretty sure it's illegal under NY law to dock an employee's base pay for doing work in the wrong place. |
|
Date: January 9th, 2025 3:02 PM Author: UN peacekeeper Then isn't it illegal in any case whatever they mean by docking? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5661000&forum_id=2).#48536852) |
|
Date: January 9th, 2025 3:10 PM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., which is part of the reason this makes no sense. a salaried employee doesn't have a "full time schedule." under law, you're entitled to your salary whether you work 35 or 45 hours that week. the concept of less than a full time schedule doesnt apply to salaried EEs so this is just nonsensical.
to further complicate things, they seem to be conflating the concept of working hours under labor laws and billable hours. my thought is they did this intentionally to make it purposely vague and confusing and meaningless so as not to run afoul of any labor laws, but to just scare people. no way the #3 law firm in the country or whatever they are could be this retarded.
|
|
Date: January 9th, 2025 3:14 PM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., P.S. i've read this once again (for the 27th time or so), and i have a new take.
i think what it may be trying to express is that if you "work from home" for a week and bill 7 hours that week, we're going to just treat it as you were on vacation ... because we know you didnt really work and were really on vacation... so we're gonna ding you 4 days of vacation days.
whereas if you come to the office all week and jerk off with the door closed all day and poast on xo because work is slow of because you're just a slacker, and only bill 7 hours that week.... we're not gonna dock you vacation days, because that's now how we roll.
it's probably just a CYA to get rid of people who are on their way out and dont show up for 3 months and say they're "working from home" despite billing nothing. they've been ok for decades with people on their way out doing this on their way out, tho, which is weird. |
|
Date: January 9th, 2025 12:19 AM Author: Nazca Redlines What do their partners think about it? At my firm, which has a loosely enforced 3 days a week in office "requirement," partners are in fewer days and hours per week than associates. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5661000&forum_id=2).#48534536) |
|
Date: January 9th, 2025 7:25 AM Author: He flexed his right muscle. Yeah this (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5661000&forum_id=2).#48534997) |
|
Date: January 9th, 2025 12:25 AM Author: Die Hard 2: Die Harder I think much of this is in place to align with client expectations. It comes on the heels of JPM announcing it would go to 5 days a week. Maybe it is a way to try to curry favor there. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5661000&forum_id=2).#48534548) |
|
Date: January 9th, 2025 6:19 AM Author: UN peacekeeper curry (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5661000&forum_id=2).#48534930) |
|
Date: January 9th, 2025 7:26 AM Author: He flexed his right muscle. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5661000&forum_id=2).#48534999) |
|
Date: January 9th, 2025 12:28 AM Author: Rabbi Shmuley using his daughter's lube ((zurich is stained)) At my former shitty biglaw firm, really good associate in my group was dinged for partner this year and one of the reasons cited was she wasn’t in the office often enough. My former partner and party buddy said the firm now tracks when you’re in the office, including partners. That alone makes me glad I left. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5661000&forum_id=2).#48534565) |
|
Date: January 9th, 2025 1:42 PM Author: Jonald J. Trump that just sounds to me like they were looking for any reason to ding her. if she was really the primary driver of valuable relationships, which is generally what's required ime, they wouldn't cut that loose just because she doesn't go to the office? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5661000&forum_id=2).#48536350) |
|
Date: January 9th, 2025 1:49 PM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., WHO is tracking this, and HOW (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5661000&forum_id=2).#48536384) |
|
Date: January 9th, 2025 12:39 AM Author: Blackpill Bob Paralegal "Mohamed" approves! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5661000&forum_id=2).#48534596) |
|
Date: January 9th, 2025 6:37 AM Author: ,..,,......,....,,,,..,.,... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCfskCfI50k (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5661000&forum_id=2).#48534948) |