The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Film is only shot at 24fps because people got used to it in the 1920s
| chestnut yapping hall | 01/09/25 |
| Odious useless brakes | 01/09/25 |
| chestnut yapping hall | 01/10/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 9th, 2025 11:10 PM Author: chestnut yapping hall Movies don't look like "movies" at 30fps, they look like TV shows. But that's only because we are used to seeing the film image hang in front of are eyes a bit longer.
Hollywood justified this for years by claiming that each cell in film reel should be treated like an individual photograph. A work of art. The film looks more "artistic" at this slowass framerate they said, to keep costs low. You know they would have shot Lawrence of Arabia at 120fps if Hollywood let off the brakes |
Date: January 9th, 2025 11:16 PM Author: Odious useless brakes they have a point about each frame being a work of art though. films shot in high framerates just look like trashy throwaway entertainment. like I saw that Hobbit movie and the whole time I was thinking "this sucks and looks really lame". there's something inherently prole about it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5661871&forum_id=2).#48538864) |
 |
Date: January 10th, 2025 12:31 AM Author: chestnut yapping hall Why not just have the movie be 2fps like Wallace and Grommit if each image is so damn beautiful? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5661871&forum_id=2).#48539011) |