Tucker Talks about Blake without Saying His Name
| Fucking Fuckface | 06/26/26 | | Ape Arrogance | 06/26/26 | | Fucking Fuckface | 06/26/26 | | Paralegal Marandi | 06/27/26 | | Ape Arrogance | 06/27/26 | | Paralegal Marandi | 06/27/26 | | cowgod | 06/27/26 | | Consuela | 06/27/26 | | Paralegal Marandi | 06/27/26 | | Consuela | 06/27/26 | | Paralegal Marandi | 06/27/26 | | cowgod | 06/27/26 | | Ape Arrogance | 06/27/26 | | cowgod | 06/27/26 | | Consuela | 06/27/26 | | a simple jewish ape who likes the sea | 06/27/26 | | Ape Arrogance | 06/27/26 | | Ape Arrogance | 06/27/26 | | a simple jewish ape who likes the sea | 06/27/26 | | Ape Arrogance | 06/27/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 26th, 2026 9:08 PM Author: Fucking Fuckface
Basically says that Charlie's death thrust Blake into a role he's not suited for and in which he has done a terrible job. But that he feels sad for him and sorry for him and knows how much pressure there must be. Doesn't talk shit or call him out for lying about his proximity to and with Charlie or for stabbing him in the back:
https://youtu.be/UxF-6puqdw4?t=7085
It's actually a pretty interesting segment starting a little before the 1:57 mark, where he makes the claim that Charlie felt about Israel very similarly to how Tucker feels currently
He also talks about whether he thinks Erika was a closeted Israel firster before Charlie's death:
https://youtu.be/UxF-6puqdw4?t=7204
The entire interview is worth listening to while jogging or gardening or cooking or whatever despite the interviewer being pretty fucking terrible (doesn't follow up on interesting answers or ask clarifying questions of interest almost ever)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5877681&forum_id=2).#49964845) |
Date: June 27th, 2026 12:34 AM Author: Consuela
i like the nuance of the statement: he thinks the turning point guys are in over their heads, not suited for the roles, didn't take the correct positions on iran and other things, yet that he has empathy for them on a personal level in the sense that they didn't quite choose this, that the role was thrust upon them. he says this without malice and without naming them personally
nice statement, makes me like tucker a bit more
his read on erika's motivation was surprising, she seems like a total nutjob based on her public persona
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5877681&forum_id=2).#49965091) |
Date: June 27th, 2026 12:47 AM Author: a simple jewish ape who likes the sea
"Charlie was anti neocon"
Lol what? He was a YUGE neocon. He loved Trump and the establishment. He was pro Israel.
The idea that Charlie was going to become anti Israel and take the groyper pill is just crazy. Charlie was a Ted Cruz Republican and so was Tucker for most of his life until five minutes ago and so is Charles and Matt Walsh and countless other good goyim who support Israel and always have and always will. It's just plain crazy to assume that Charlie would have simply gone against the President just because. Charlie loved establishment Republicans, and he loved Israel.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5877681&forum_id=2).#49965101) |
 |
Date: June 27th, 2026 1:03 AM Author: a simple jewish ape who likes the sea
Didn't he die way before the Iran War? How could he be against it or are you saying he was against Operation Midnight Hammer? I forget when exactly he died.
So you really think this guy was anti Israel because he wrote a few things to a couple people questioning it? That made him anti Israel? He was extremely pro establishment his whole life but he had a few private questions about Israel and so that means he would have supported Thomas Massie and shit? I just don't think there's a ton of evidence that he was leaning that way.
MTG quit and Massie got expelled, Joe Kent resigned and Tucker made a huge shift after decades of being on top and being rich already and reading the tea leaves. Charlie would have had to give up all of his access to the President and forego his business and political empire in order to change sides. Just seems unlikely. And this is all just based on a couple of texts? I think the fact that TPUSA are all GOPe tells you everything you need to know about who Charlie was in life. Charles didn't stab him in the back, he continued the work. This is who Charlie was. He was the establishment guy, not the anti establishment guy. I'm sorry if this opinion hurts you.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5877681&forum_id=2).#49965122) |
 |
Date: June 27th, 2026 1:12 AM Author: Ape Arrogance
dude what? did you forget about the attack on the nuclear facilities in June of last year??? [edit: not sure if you added that or if I missed it the first time, yes Midnight Hammer.] even if you don't consider that to be the start of the war, he was against war with Iran in general. he said so publicly and vehemently. I shouldn't have initially phrased it as "the Iran war" when I actually meant "war with Iran" - I edited right away after I realized that was poor wording.
I absolutely do find it likely that he was starting to turn against Israel based on the facts I laid out. not "anti Israel." I never said he was "anti Israel" at the time of his death, nor did you mention that in your initial response. you said it was crazy to think he "was going to become anti Israel." I feel like a 40 IQ Redditor using the phrase "moving the goalposts" but it's what you do CONSTANTLY and it's what you did here. it's easy to forget how smart you are.
I have no idea what you're trying to say with the third paragraph, and I don't think you know either, because that was a mess.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5877681&forum_id=2).#49965128) |
|
|