Celebs who lost houses in fire seem to be 90s/00s celebs; why no recent stars?
| fiercely-loyal vermilion turdskin step-uncle's house | 01/09/25 | | thriller cruise ship | 01/09/25 | | White Appetizing Space Skinny Woman | 01/09/25 | | thriller cruise ship | 01/09/25 | | Obsidian Insane Nowag Haunted Graveyard | 01/09/25 | | thriller cruise ship | 01/09/25 | | Exhilarant Giraffe | 01/09/25 | | anal vibrant lodge philosopher-king | 01/09/25 | | Exhilarant Giraffe | 01/09/25 | | Pea-brained Heady Milk | 01/09/25 | | Zombie-like theater new version | 01/09/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 9th, 2025 4:52 PM Author: White Appetizing Space Skinny Woman
There's a certain amount of truth to this. Nice houses here are like $20 mm - only celebs with huge endorsement deals can afford that these days.
Old Hollywood lived in Beverly Hills. The stars of the 80s and 90s couldn't afford it so they went to the Palisades and the Hills.
Current stars can't afford that so they live in Silverlake and the valley.
It's sort of like the UES vs Soho vs Brooklyn in NYC.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5661649&forum_id=2).#48537445) |
|
|