XO POLL: Moast Intelligent Human Being Known In Human Hi$tory?
| Obsidian shrine | 07/04/25 | | Cerebral aqua cumskin | 07/04/25 | | talented site | 07/04/25 | | sexy slippery theater | 07/04/25 | | Obsidian shrine | 07/04/25 | | Poppy Effete Jewess | 07/04/25 | | Cerebral aqua cumskin | 07/04/25 | | Poppy Effete Jewess | 07/04/25 | | Cerebral aqua cumskin | 07/04/25 | | Poppy Effete Jewess | 07/04/25 | | Cerebral aqua cumskin | 07/05/25 | | Obsidian shrine | 07/05/25 | | Dull Razzle-dazzle Philosopher-king | 07/05/25 | | Obsidian shrine | 07/06/25 | | Dull Razzle-dazzle Philosopher-king | 07/05/25 | | Obsidian shrine | 07/05/25 | | Dull Razzle-dazzle Philosopher-king | 07/06/25 | | Startling mind-boggling location volcanic crater | 07/06/25 | | lascivious nowag filthpig | 07/05/25 | | Vigorous Library Fanboi | 07/06/25 | | lascivious nowag filthpig | 07/06/25 | | Poppy Effete Jewess | 07/06/25 | | lascivious nowag filthpig | 07/06/25 | | Poppy Effete Jewess | 07/06/25 | | Scarlet Ticket Booth | 07/05/25 | | Emerald bearded depressive | 07/06/25 | | black odious station | 07/05/25 | | Indigo jew | 07/06/25 | | Poppy Effete Jewess | 07/06/25 | | vivacious temple pistol | 07/06/25 | | Poppy Effete Jewess | 07/06/25 | | Crusty Stead | 07/06/25 | | Obsidian shrine | 07/06/25 | | Obsidian shrine | 07/06/25 | | Obsidian shrine | 07/06/25 | | Startling mind-boggling location volcanic crater | 07/06/25 | | Obsidian shrine | 07/06/25 | | Vigorous Library Fanboi | 07/06/25 | | Obsidian shrine | 07/06/25 | | vivacious temple pistol | 07/06/25 | | Emerald bearded depressive | 07/06/25 | | Poppy Effete Jewess | 07/06/25 | | Overrated Orchestra Pit | 07/06/25 | | Flesh Persian | 07/06/25 | | Awkward Fuchsia Cruise Ship | 07/06/25 | | Flesh Persian | 07/06/25 | | Laughsome alcoholic party of the first part public bath | 07/06/25 | | lascivious nowag filthpig | 07/06/25 | | Deep boiling water | 07/06/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:09 PM Author: Poppy Effete Jewess
Past, I'm sticking with Feynman.
Present, my vote goes to Penrose.
We don't have sufficient information to speak to the majority of mankind, so it's really not a meaningful question.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2).#49072538) |
 |
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:24 PM Author: Poppy Effete Jewess
Can we really speak to ancient peoples? So little of their work and others' views of them is extant. Their popularity and contributions may be more a function of momentum than objective truths... just look at any old religious book.
I'd argue even the likes of Newton or Leibniz are too old to speak of in the same way as modern people.
I actually don't know much about Witten. I bet most scientists don't have Feynman's charisma & ability to communicate, though. (Just flip through anything Penrose has written.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2).#49072579) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:33 PM Author: Poppy Effete Jewess
A lot of writings (and the history of people) have been lost over the past 2.5k years.
There were also great contributions from India & the far East in classical & medieval times that most of us aren't aware of. (How many of us could name the author of Al-Jabr, let alone read it?)
We can speak of those the knowledge of whom is extant, or has been translated into our native language, but not so much to the 'most intelligent person ever.'
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2).#49076775) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:19 PM Author: Poppy Effete Jewess
Who's to say that the four contributors to QED won't go down as the most intelligent, influential people of the history of the world 2.5k years from now?
I would argue that the most influential individuals aren't necessarily the most intelligent. The further back in time we go, the more influential an individual becomes. Some kid in 2021 with a wacky GUT hasn't had 2.5k years to gain the infamy of a Plato.
Besides, could Plato even handle UG physics at CalTech today? (Conversely, could a CalTech grad today do what Plato did c. 500 BCE?)
Obviously, OP's question has no absolute answer, but it's still fun to argue.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2).#49077202) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 12:10 AM Author: Indigo jew
I think it has to be Newton, for coming up with calculus + figuring out all the aspects of practical physics.
The only other contender is Einstein, who on 2 occasions figured out things in physics that don't make intuitive sense at all.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2).#49075462) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:26 AM Author: Startling mind-boggling location volcanic crater
Short list:
Tesla, Newton, Da Vinci, Plato
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2).#49075746) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:51 PM Author: Emerald bearded depressive
Jansci von Nuemann
As much as I hate to nominate a turd, Ramanujan is easily a top contender
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2).#49076800) |
|
|