https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/N302DD111750511EFBFC3857D4D0DB448

"The form of proposed Scheduling Order filed should not include the word “proposed” in the title."

You know why? Because putting "proposed" in the text of proposed orders has always been a really retarded practice.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5754119&forum_id=2).#49127324)

You're proposing the actual text to be used. You're not proposing the use of "proposed." Why the hell would you tell the judge, "please enter an order with the caption PROPOSED ORDER"?

You wouldn't. You want an ORDER. So propose an ORDER. It's obvious from the accompanying motion, stipulation, or whatever that the text of the order you've submitted is proposed. And it's obvious that your unsigned order submitted by a party isn't an order from the judge.

Adding [PROPOSED] in your caption doesn't benefit to anyone, so don't do it. And the risk that your actual order ends up with a dogshit [PROPOSED] in the actual, official, entered order is orders of magnitude greater than any trivial, imaginary risk you might imagine from omitting your precious [PROPOSED] from the caption.

It's time for this madness to end everywhere.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5754119&forum_id=2).#49127446)