2020 election - do you mean there was no funny business, or do you mean whatever funny business happened wasn't enough to affect the outcome?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2).#49931494)

Yeah. Maybe numbers are exaggerated by 30% or something, but I believe that millions of Jews died. Maybe more of them died from starving than gassing or whatever, but the fact is that statistically a bunch of Jews disappeared. There were shitloads of Jews in Europe, and then there were almost none, and immigration to Israel or the US is nowhere near enough to explain the discrepancy. And it's pretty undeniable that a major Nazi goal was to get rid of Jews. You have to "BUT ACKSHUALLLLY WHAT THEY MEANT WAS..." a lot of shit to argue otherwise.

"2020 election - do you mean there was no funny business, or do you mean whatever funny business happened wasn't enough to affect the outcome?"

I don't believe there was anything resembling an orchestrated conspiracy to rig the election. I don't believe anything that did happen affected the outcome either way. I believe that any "funny business" was likely at worst either a) limited isolated incidents of some election staffer making a ballet box go poof, or b) stuff that's not actually illegal like "helping" poors/retards fill out mail in ballots. Probably quite a lot of the latter. Lots of really horseshit reddit level arguments come up here, like "B B BUT THE SWING INDICATORS!" or "DUR DUR SO MANY MORE PEOPLE VOTED THOUGH!" with very little evidence of pretty much anything. If rigging happened to any significant degree there is no way it would have occurred without massive amounts of evidence in the wake. People are way too fucking retarded to do this in a clean and coordinated on a grand scale while leaving no evidence.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2).#49931660)

and for the election yeah I'd say no more rigging than usual, without taking a position on exactly how much rigging there usually is.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2).#49931693)

"Bauer and other historians who knew Wiesenthal said the Nazi hunter told them that he chose the 5 million number carefully: He wanted a number large enough to attract the attention of non-Jews who might not otherwise care about Jewish suffering, but not larger than the actual number of Jews who were murdered in the Holocaust, 6 million."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2).#49932633)

Most of the moon landing was filmed in a studio to break the will of the Soviets. I am torn as to whether or not there was an actual moon landing, but I think much of what we've seen is studio footage.

Consuela isn't totally wrong about what is going on in the world.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2).#49930964)

In fact I believe that Consuela's one-world-control center answers this neatly

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2).#49931411)

at this point I wouldn't be shocked about the moon landing. we know they WOULD lie to us about ANYTHING and I certainly can't prove we did it. I still think it was real but I'm not gonna die on that... in that crater?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2).#49931455)

The most interesting stuff in the book might be related to Men in Black. Very strange and unnerving, but also sort of fun.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2).#49932588)

Got in a huge fight with a boomer coworker over it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2).#49931446)

It's all psyop cold war bullshit.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2).#49931442)

Although I don't believe this is unhinged but rather is the most parsimonious, logical explanation for many, many things we have observed.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2).#49931296)

the only specific star that I think was more likely replaced than not is Jim Carrey. there are a lot of people like Selena Gomez and Jenna Ortega who started looking way different within short time periods but I think it's more likely due to trauma, humiliation rituals, etc... but after the Epstein email about Selena Gomez and watching well-researched videos about how she seems to have gotten in the way of powerful Hollywood people's plans and goals, she's second on the list.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2).#49931489)

Kanye more so though

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2).#49931517)

it could be ANYTHING. maybe concert tix for some of the little girls, whatever. literally anything.

but the theory that people were kicking around even before this email came out, and I'm not saying I actually believe this, is that Biebs and Selena secretly had a baby and he had to choose - for whatever dark purposes - to either give up her or the baby. they chose her and the current Selena is a replacement.

some people use the "die" typo as part of their rationale but nah ding I've read thousands of Epstein emails and don't think his shitty-ass spelling means anything

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2).#49931555)

It is definitely weird how much archaeologists and mainstream historians push back on this stuff. Gobekli Tepe was the tip of the iceberg IMO.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2).#49932598)

Even if one doesn’t agree with his exact conclusions, it is very clear there is way more going on and shit is far, far older than academic freaks would allow us to believe.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2).#49932693)

One of the other things that Hancock does is actually go into the field as almost the default approach. And he makes a very strong case for the usefulness of oral histories and doesn’t dismiss them as myth stories as typical academics do. So he finds leads to pursue because he isn’t tied to standard academic thinking. His book also gave me the sense that he really ‘does the work’ in a way that I don’t think the typical academic does.

The typical academic egghead fraud is just not equipped for this sort of approach and is, in my view, more predisposed to a sort of boring “nothing ever happens” gay perspective because it reflects who they are inside. And collectively they attack anyone who takes real views in opposition to them because it requires some amount of fortitude and will, something they basically never have.

I think there is also a great nihilism that has become pervasive in general and absolutely extends to this field. People have been conditioned to accept that “everything is just random lol we are all just stardust” ::hits vape:: so when someone really challenges their worldview, they lash out.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2).#49932941)

That's the part that makes me feel like there must be more behind the interference plays than simple dogma. But I can't really explain it unless there's something important that needs to be filtered from popular understanding

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2).#49932995)

One of those ideas that sounds crazy at first, but I think there are decent arguments for. Expert level meditators get to a point where they feel there is no true “self.” And it’s like, than what is there? Maybe it’s the field that we all emerge from and return to again and again for all time.

::rocks back and forth in padded room::

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2).#49932955)