The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Lawyers who disregard order of addressees in email
| Cobalt idiot | 11/29/18 |
| Exciting coldplay fan | 07/08/25 |
| Avocado potus | 07/08/25 |
| Maniacal Telephone | 07/08/25 |
| Avocado potus | 07/08/25 |
| angry comical digit ratio hominid | 07/08/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 29th, 2018 4:58 PM Author: Cobalt idiot (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4145369&forum_id=2).#37322384) |
Date: July 8th, 2025 10:49 PM Author: Exciting coldplay fan (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4145369&forum_id=2).#49084769) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2025 10:52 PM Author: Avocado potus i’ve seen *former* lawyers who did this, but never any that were able to remain barred. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4145369&forum_id=2).#49084782) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2025 10:56 PM Author: Maniacal Telephone You mean alphabetical (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4145369&forum_id=2).#49084803) |
 |
Date: July 8th, 2025 10:57 PM Author: Avocado potus ljl. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4145369&forum_id=2).#49084806) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2025 11:02 PM Author: angry comical digit ratio hominid i was adjacent to a situation where a low level associate was sending out an email to the client, two partners, and two other non-partners.
the associate got reamed, in a screaming way, by the senior partner for not listing the client first in the "to" line, then the partners by seniority in the "to" line, and then the non-partners by seniority in the "cc" line. |