The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Quantum entanglement is nuts
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 21st, 2026 12:53 PM Author: gibberish (?) Actions that happen faster than the speed of light? We basically know 1% of the universe. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953315) |
 |
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:11 PM Author: a blank bump 4 ya mind https://imgbb.com/gbsqxnHg (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953355) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 2:00 PM Author: pizza friend of course things can move faster (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953432) |
Date: June 21st, 2026 12:55 PM Author: Richard Ames Not a physics expert obviously, but I feel like a lot of the quantum shit is just something our brains aren’t able to comprehend. So the stuff appears mega mysterious, but is likely just far beyond our abilities. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953321) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 12:56 PM Author: a blank bump 4 ya mind what if you could outrun a future reaching to pull you there
using unpredictable chaos & entropymaxxing once you feel it coming |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 12:57 PM Author: Kenneth Play (emotional girth) same. there must be some sort of connection/relationship that we just haven't discovered yet (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953326) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 12:59 PM Author: AI has never started a F500 company agreed (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953329) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:02 PM Author: gibberish (?) How could it possibly be faster than the speed of light? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953335) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:10 PM Author: AI has never started a F500 company I don't really think this is right, I think it's more likely far beyond our current understanding of physics, but the one thing I can think of offhand that's consistent with our current ape physics is if it travels through another dimension. I always think of that early-internet flash animation about imagining the 10th dimension (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953352) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:14 PM Author: Richard Ames lol dude I have not thought of that in ages. That guy got so brutally shit on by “string theorists”, but his presentation was so intuitive that it felt “right.” Math freaks BTFO’d.
tyft |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:15 PM Author: AI has never started a F500 company lol so was it wrong or ??? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953372) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:20 PM Author: Richard Ames “String theorists” basically said that the math showed 10 dimensions (sometimes way more), but that we cannot comprehend the dimensions because they are actually super duper tiny and curled up.
What’s funny to me is that their description just sounds like 3 dimensions, but super small. Whereas the guy you are referencing actually presented something coherent and elegant. |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:22 PM Author: AI has never started a F500 company it seems like a lot of the time, different subfields or theories model things differently and "academics" get so stuck in their own little worlds that they don't realize that the models are not only compatible, not only useful in analyzing each other, but also ultimately collapse to the same thing in some sense
(that is, if they're correct in the first place) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:39 PM Author: a blank bump 4 ya mind https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth,_fifth,_and_sixth_derivatives_of_position (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953402) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2026 6:07 AM Author: askav maybe that's not the universal speed limit. or maybe we don't understand space, and it's not actually 'faster'. who knows man. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49954922) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2026 6:08 AM Author: getulio (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49954923) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2026 11:09 AM Author: AI has never started a F500 company I agree but I don't think it's relevant here (and I was also talking about the wrong thing when I mentioned the wrinkle-in-time type stuff). upon further research, I'm pretty sure the actual resolution to this particular question is:
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:53 PM Author: "civilization" could be here, he thought
The "speed of light" is actually the universe's speed of causality and quantum entanglement/"spooky action at a distance" doesn't violate this speed of causality
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2#49953416 |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:03 PM Author: Richard Ames I watched some guy on YT a while back who was talking about a new theory to explain this which involves the idea that information basically exists outside of time (or something to that effect.) I will try and find it at some point because it was intriguing.
I get the general sense that “time” isn’t really a real thing and that the fields that underly everything can carry and hold information in ways our minds cannot comprehend. |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:06 PM Author: AI has never started a F500 company this is similar to how Tom Campbell described remote viewing, astral projection, etc. - like you're tapping into some additional data stream. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953344) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:06 PM Author: Kenneth Play (emotional girth) if you had perfect information about the laws of nature, and all the matter in the universe, you could solve for where everything would be at any moment in time, right? not sure if that's what you're saying or not, but that's how i see it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953345) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:13 PM Author: Richard Ames I think it’s more fundamental. But I will have to dig up the video at some point.
Somewhat related, I recently read someone argue that basically all life stems from the electromagnetic field. Meaning that life itself is simply the electromagnetic field operating across matter. I am oversimplifying, but it was intriguing.
I have thought a lot that God basically reveals the Truth to us in whatever capacity we are capable of understanding. And as our tools improve, we are shown the Truth in a clearer light. But we sometimes get arrogant and think we know it all. When in fact we know only what God shows us at a point in time given the tools we have.
::ends sermon:: |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 4:02 PM Author: Kenneth Play (emotional girth) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953613) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:00 PM Author: gibberish (?) How does the electron immediately switch polarity thousands of miles away? That makes zero sense. A photon can't travel that fast. Sim error. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953334) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:07 PM Author: Bow tie niggas always have very strong opinions It defies our human intuition and how we view the world. We can understand it and apply quantum science, but I don't think anyone "comprehends" it. Like knowing how a women thinks but knowing you will never "comprehend" it.
Time and existence either began at some point and there was nothing before it, or it's always existed and there was no beginning. I dont think anyone can really comprehend either of those even though one has to be true. |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2026 10:53 AM Author: Robert Byrd Schitt cr. i would concede that there could possibly be other explanations that my monkey brain cannot even conceptualize, but the fact remains that no answer is ever likely to be intuitively feasible. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49955289) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2026 11:03 AM Author: Bow tie niggas always have very strong opinions That's very true. Me saying it can only be one or the other is because I can only conceive of time as linear. It being circular or something else entirely is possible, but that's even harder to conceptualize. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49955320) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:11 PM Author: a blank bump 4 ya mind https://imgbb.com/ds7CbRJg (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953356) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:15 PM Author: Richard Ames lol tyft (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953373) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 12:55 PM Author: a blank bump 4 ya mind arrogant to assume we know 1% (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953322) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 12:58 PM Author: gibberish (?) Fair (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953327) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 12:59 PM Author: whyisthatthere it just looks like magic because we're stupid (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953330) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:12 PM Author: a blank bump 4 ya mind https://imgbb.com/q4HJkCy (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953358) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 12:59 PM Author: Kenneth Play (emotional girth) also to add, we know basically zero about the universe. there are way more stars in the universe than there are grains of sand on the earth. our sun, n=1. and most stars have planets orbiting them (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953331) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:00 PM Author: a blank bump 4 ya mind this assumes what we see through our eyes constitutes the physical objective reality
it's possible we are traversing bent up geometry on the regular |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:02 PM Author: TurboGrafx-67 Is that true about planets? How could we know this? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953337) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:08 PM Author: state your IQ before I engage you further Because the jewscope zoomed in on a section of space with 1000 flickers of light per millimeter and even though the resolution was dogshit they enhanced it, did an artist's rendering, and said all those flickers are planets passing in front of stars. And that's just one small section of the sky (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953348) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:18 PM Author: Richard Ames It’s all fucking Bryce 3D. I watched some video that was showing the raw footage from a telescope before it gets “enhanced,” and it’s basically just blank.
It reminds me of the “footage” of the hexagon on Saturn. This to me is a bit of a “space is fake” red pill. Given that Jews have had some weird Saturn cube worship shit long before we had space rockets and telescopes. So either they had some foreknowledge of a cube on Saturn or they just make it all up. |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 2:33 PM Author: The Penis Yeah but that's just how instruments/sensors work in the sciences. GC-MS, NMR, electron microscopes and whatever else aren't giving you beautiful renderings of atoms, ions, or energy gradients or whatever. It's a bunch of janky signal and the underlying structure gets inferred. I think it seems misleading, because telescopes originally were a tube you looked through and saw an enlarged version of something you'd see with the bare eyeball. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953480) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2026 10:54 AM Author: Richard Ames Obviously I understand this, but it does offer opportunities for certain (((people))) to manipulate things. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49955292) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:08 PM Author: Kenneth Play (emotional girth) oh i don't pretend to be an expert here, i rely on what the astronomers say. there is some extrapolation/assumption https://www.space.com/26078-how-many-stars-are-there.html (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953349) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:12 PM Author: a blank bump 4 ya mind https://imgbb.com/Wpxf16dS (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953360) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:09 PM Author: cucumbers This is merely a failure/inadequacy of the quantum mechanical model. Also, the speed of light is not an absolute limit for everything; most of the universe is expanding from other parts of the universe faster than the speed of light. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953351) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:12 PM Author: a blank bump 4 ya mind https://imgbb.com/TB55V039 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953361) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:15 PM Author: cucumbers Cr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953371) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:15 PM Author: Richard Ames Pants are tightening!!!!! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953375) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:18 PM Author: UN peacekeeper 1. That is not what quantum entanglement is 2. Why do you think that it’s stranger for the universe not to have a maximum universal speed limit? That was a revolutionary idea |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:20 PM Author: cucumbers The universe does not have a "universal" speed limit. At long enough distances, space is expanding faster than the speed of light. Most of the universe is expanding faster than the speed of light with no known limit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953384) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:25 PM Author: UN peacekeeper yes i meant speed of matter as did OP (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953387) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:26 PM Author: Bow tie niggas always have very strong opinions We don't know any of this. We haven't even solved all the mysteries of the human body. To think we know anything about how or if the universe is expanding (into what?), much less at the speed that happens, is hubris. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953388) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:30 PM Author: UN peacekeeper it's not necessarily expanding into anything (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953390) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:35 PM Author: whyisthatthere right that definitely makes sense (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953395) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:37 PM Author: UN peacekeeper a static universe contradicts literally every astronomical observation (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953399) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:39 PM Author: whyisthatthere the solution? The definitely not contradictory proposition, "it's not expanding into anything." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953401) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:44 PM Author: UN peacekeeper there is no contradiction. "expansion" just means exactly what we find by measurement: every star or other body is getting farther and farther apart from every other one. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953405) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:53 PM Author: whyisthatthere Right, there's no contradiction in saying "the glass is not expanding INTO anything, idiot." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953415) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 2:00 PM Author: UN peacekeeper well human brain can't actually picture a, say, finite universe that's curved in on itself without being situated inside an extra dimension but it's mathematically possible. but if the universe is an infinite expance even humans can picture the expansion (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953430) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 2:02 PM Author: whyisthatthere Mostly because those are all Insane Copes and God built Man to biologically resist Insane Copes (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953436) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:40 PM Author: a blank bump 4 ya mind https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visible_spectrum (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953403) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:50 PM Author: Bow tie niggas always have very strong opinions How does something like the rate at which the Earth travels around the sun contradict whether the universe is expanding? And then why did Einstein think it was static?
"contradicts literally every astronomical observation" strikes me as an embellishment someone who doesn't know what they're talking about says to seem authoritative. |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:52 PM Author: UN peacekeeper this is xo, hyperbole is de rigueur (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953414) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:56 PM Author: Bow tie niggas always have very strong opinions Seems reddit coded especially with the "literally" in there (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953418) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 2:00 PM Author: UN peacekeeper 90% of xo memes come from there (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953434) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:33 PM Author: a blank bump 4 ya mind https://imgbb.com/7dsY8zJn (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953394) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:53 PM Author: "civilization" could be here, he thought The "speed of light" is actually the universe's speed of causality and quantum entanglement/"spooky action at a distance" doesn't violate this speed of causality (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953416) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:57 PM Author: AI has never started a F500 company ITT: lawyers attempt to discuss physics (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953419) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 1:59 PM Author: a blank bump 4 ya mind https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5x4LJ9d84Y (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953427) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 2:58 PM Author: samoth *disproves QM using abelian algebra* (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49953518) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 8:29 PM Author: ........,,,,,,......,.,.,.,,,,,,,,,, Quantum mechanics is something that even the people who have won Nobel Prizes for it, fully admit makes no sense and they dont understand it.
It makes some sense in the language of math, but it isn't something that they could intelligently explain to even like the average Harvard philosophy major and have them think it makes sense.
I think Newtonian physics, even at an atomic level, is intuitive to most smart humans. QM is math that computes to magic to the human mind - so its either incorrect or something we can't comprehend. |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2026 1:22 AM Author: RUN LIKE HELL (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49954808) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2026 9:52 AM Author: Bow tie niggas always have very strong opinions A lot of it is demonstrably correct since quantum engineering is used for practical applications today. And that's what's so crazy about it. What know that it's true but it makes no sense. I don't think anyone can really comprehend superposition yet we know it to a certainty. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49955131) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 8:33 PM Author: Mega Penis ITT: twerking clips helping me understand physics (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49954162) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 10:44 PM Author: Panini Stone its how WOC signal esterous (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49954548) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2026 1:18 AM Author: .,.,.,.,,,,.,,.,.,.,...,,..,, Aren’t iPads crazy (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876174&forum_id=2).#49954807) |