The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| flushed curious casino | 01/06/26 | | iridescent resort | 01/06/26 | | slate bbw | 01/06/26 | | iridescent resort | 01/06/26 | | slate bbw | 01/06/26 | | iridescent resort | 01/06/26 | | flushed curious casino | 01/06/26 | | iridescent resort | 01/06/26 | | flushed curious casino | 01/06/26 | | pungent trip dopamine | 01/07/26 | | bateful institution | 01/06/26 | | Shimmering racy athletic conference corn cake | 01/06/26 | | slate bbw | 01/06/26 | | Vibrant Toilet Seat | 01/06/26 | | slate bbw | 01/06/26 | | naked beady-eyed piazza | 01/06/26 | | stirring rose theatre | 01/06/26 | | Cruel-hearted people who are hurt tanning salon | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: iridescent resort
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2).#49568134) |
|
|