The need to get rid of "insanity defense"
| The Penis | 09/04/26 | | VoteRepublican | 09/04/26 | | average/ordinary/typical citizen/person | 09/04/26 | | The Penis | 09/04/26 | | average/ordinary/typical citizen/person | 09/04/26 | | I have no money and must win nihilistic $$ battle | 09/04/26 | | faggot account | 09/04/26 | | The Penis | 09/04/26 | | average/ordinary/typical citizen/person | 09/04/26 | | Gay Grandpa | 09/04/26 | | average/ordinary/typical citizen/person | 09/04/26 | | Gay Grandpa | 09/04/26 | | average/ordinary/typical citizen/person | 09/04/26 | | Ivan Bourne Tall III | 09/04/26 | | thinkin' about asians | 09/04/26 | | The Penis | 09/04/26 | | 1.618 | 09/04/26 | | Michael Stonebreaker | 09/04/26 | | 1.618 | 09/04/26 | | Michael Stonebreaker | 09/04/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 4th, 2026 9:11 PM Author: Michael Stonebreaker
my impression is that NGI seemed to be something that was trendy during the heyday of 70s shitliberalism, when multiple high-profile NGI verdicts were won, but which became almost unknown during the 80s/90s/00s law & order backlash era once people realized it was bullshit.
i remember dozens of high-profile cases in the 90s in which the defendant tried for NGI but ended up in the electric chair.
like a lot of discredited 70s shitlib excesses, it seems to have been inexplicably resurrected in the last decade.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5900735&forum_id=2).#50116712) |
|
|