The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| Brilliant galvanic base doctorate | 01/06/26 | | fishy temple mother | 01/06/26 | | medicated double fault | 01/06/26 | | fishy temple mother | 01/06/26 | | medicated double fault | 01/06/26 | | fishy temple mother | 01/06/26 | | Brilliant galvanic base doctorate | 01/06/26 | | fishy temple mother | 01/06/26 | | Brilliant galvanic base doctorate | 01/06/26 | | histrionic violet ticket booth | 01/07/26 | | Heady hall | 01/06/26 | | Cerise Frisky Cruise Ship Factory Reset Button | 01/06/26 | | medicated double fault | 01/06/26 | | Jet Piazza | 01/06/26 | | medicated double fault | 01/06/26 | | Transparent lascivious sanctuary | 01/06/26 | | Hairless Ebony Regret Lay | 01/06/26 | | Snowy Splenetic Garrison | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: fishy temple mother
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2,#49568134) |
|
|