The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| Gold fragrant immigrant property | 01/06/26 | | Orchid son of senegal | 01/06/26 | | twisted pearl degenerate | 01/06/26 | | Orchid son of senegal | 01/06/26 | | twisted pearl degenerate | 01/06/26 | | Orchid son of senegal | 01/06/26 | | Gold fragrant immigrant property | 01/06/26 | | Orchid son of senegal | 01/06/26 | | Gold fragrant immigrant property | 01/06/26 | | talented brethren whorehouse | 01/07/26 | | Shaky electric cruise ship | 01/06/26 | | maize diverse doctorate | 01/06/26 | | twisted pearl degenerate | 01/06/26 | | tantric rehab | 01/06/26 | | twisted pearl degenerate | 01/06/26 | | multi-colored jet-lagged keepsake machete | 01/06/26 | | Lascivious House-broken Hospital | 01/06/26 | | Gay insecure prole marketing idea | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: Orchid son of senegal
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2,#49568134) |
|
|