The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Nick Fuentes and Matt Walsh are totally wrong about Lindsay Clancy
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 2nd, 2026 1:01 AM Author: Live from Plymouth! (Prestige Feuds) You can tell they didn't watch the trial at all. Yeah in two non lawyer non educated pundits opinions the insanity plea shouldn't exist and if you lose your mind and commit a crime you should be burned at the stake? OK buddy. This is turning back the clock 400 years. Yeah let's just forget the legal process and administer the King's Justice. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899869&forum_id=2,#50110241) |
Date: September 2nd, 2026 1:18 AM Author: screen memories why are you so invested in assuring that women avoid accountability (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899869&forum_id=2,#50110246) |
 |
Date: September 2nd, 2026 1:45 AM Author: Live from Plymouth! (Prestige Feuds) I just think there's reasonably doubt and the Commonwealth did not prove that she understood her actions or could control them. She was by all accounts a nice, normal person who snapped. It could happen to anyone. We have no idea why people go insane. I don't think this was a situation at all where she didn't feel like being a mom anymore or the pressure of motherhood just got to her. I think she had a brain bug that activated 4 months after giving birth and she reached out to psychiatric professionals and they did a horrible job at understanding her case. I think they didn't listen to her or grasp the situation. The pills made her worse. I think we've all known somebody who went on meds and it made them worse.
The prosecution completely goofed in their opening statements and failed to prove several major pillars of their original case. I think it should have been bifurcated from the beginning. The prosecution only had two cudgels they wielded over and over. Cruelty and premeditation. They had no answers for her mental state. They got blown out by a lot of witness testimony. You're either mad as hell and ignored the evidence or if you paid attention to the trial, you know there's reasonable doubt. |
|
Date: September 2nd, 2026 1:52 AM Author: VoteRepublican (A true Chad!! where's your gf/wifew?) what did husband say? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899869&forum_id=2,#50110255) |
|
Date: September 2nd, 2026 1:57 AM Author: Live from Plymouth! (Prestige Feuds) What did he say about what? He testified for several hours Be more specific. |
|
Date: September 2nd, 2026 1:58 AM Author: VoteRepublican (A true Chad!! where's your gf/wifew?) she researched it nad prepared 5 hair tie things and also sent husband out right so why is it question if shes can understand or not (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899869&forum_id=2,#50110259) |
|
Date: September 2nd, 2026 2:11 AM Author: Live from Plymouth! (Prestige Feuds) Her googling how to kill the kids was never presented at trial. She did search for suicide and cures for sociopathy and shit.
She obviously premeditated sending Patrick out so he would be gone a while. But also Pat would randomly go skiing and leave her alone with the kids for the weekend. She could have easily done it then but she was probably too loopy to foresee the eventuality of her being alone with them.
You need to watch Dr. Reznik's testimony. This is the leader in the field of criminal psychiatry, so much so that the prosecution experts all cited his work. He's the GOAT at this shit. Believe him or not but he's the most prestigious expert in the field.
He talks extensively about psychosis and how it manifests. It's a difficult subject because little is known about it in general. But Reznik testified she had delusion beliefs that she could not unthink. She felt a powerful force overcome her that she needed to kill herself and that she had to protect the kids in Heaven before she could die.
Believe whatever you want but there's a lot of evidence that she was not in her right mind. Testimony about her beliefs include contradictions and falsehoods, but not about things not material to the crime. Instead, this can be taken as evidence that she was psychotic at the time. |
|
Date: September 2nd, 2026 2:34 AM Author: VoteRepublican (A true Chad!! where's your gf/wifew?) why did she smart enough to avoid attacking patriuck tho (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899869&forum_id=2,#50110273) |
|
Date: September 2nd, 2026 2:39 AM Author: Live from Plymouth! (Prestige Feuds) She didn't ever have an urge to kill Pat. She just wanted him gone from the house so she could kill the kids so she could die. Her plan was always to die but she couldn't leave the kids here on Earth without her.
She could have easily waited for his next ski trip but I believe she lacked the foresight for that. |
|
Date: September 2nd, 2026 2:39 AM Author: VoteRepublican (A true Chad!! where's your gf/wifew?) why is she fixed now and not constnatly trrying to hang herslef (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899869&forum_id=2,#50110277) |
|
Date: September 2nd, 2026 2:42 AM Author: Live from Plymouth! (Prestige Feuds) She probably still is suicidal but she lives in a state mental hospital where she's on suicide watch all the time. Ironically if she's acquitted she just stays where she is. But I assume that if she was let free and went off her meds she probably would try and kill herself again. So she's probably going to be locked up in the nuthouse forever. This entire trial is about whether it's life in prison or life in the state sanitarium. It's life either way. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899869&forum_id=2,#50110278) |
|
Date: September 2nd, 2026 3:01 AM Author: VoteRepublican (A true Chad!! where's your gf/wifew?) why ppl care so much/spend so much energy money on this trial if it doesnt rly matter (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899869&forum_id=2,#50110286) |
|
Date: September 2nd, 2026 2:09 AM Author: The Scrotum (gunneratttt) Karmelo Anthony snapped and stabbed Austin in broad daylight in front of many witnesses. Clearly he had an irresistible impulse. Should he go free? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899869&forum_id=2,#50110261) |
|
Date: September 2nd, 2026 2:13 AM Author: Live from Plymouth! (Prestige Feuds) I'm not going to debate why the insanity plea exists but as many criminal lawyers covering this case have said, every defense attorney considers the possibility of the insanity plea in every case. It is rarely viable. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899869&forum_id=2,#50110263) |
|
Date: September 2nd, 2026 2:20 AM Author: The Scrotum (gunneratttt) I'm not asking whether you think the insanity defense should exist, I'm asking you to reconcile why you think Clancey isn't guilty but Karmelo is. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899869&forum_id=2,#50110264) |
|
Date: September 2nd, 2026 2:24 AM Author: Live from Plymouth! (Prestige Feuds) It comes down to the facts and evidence presented at trial, and whether or not you believe the expert witnesses. These hot button arguments don't just exist on social media, they exist in a court of law. I've said why I believe in Lindsay's insanity defense. Karmelo's attorneys never alleged it. If it came out in trial then I would comment on it. I can only weigh in on the facts and evidence of the case. I don't recall what defense, if any, was presented by Karmelo's defense counsel, but from what little I remember it was not substantial. It basically amounted to "I dindu nuffin." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899869&forum_id=2,#50110265) |
|
Date: September 2nd, 2026 2:26 AM Author: Gay Grandpa Youre backtracking. Above you claimed irresistible impulse. Asked to define something so nebulous and inscrutable you backed down behind a wall of text. Fuck you |
|
Date: September 2nd, 2026 2:27 AM Author: The Scrotum (gunneratttt) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899869&forum_id=2,#50110267) |
|
Date: September 2nd, 2026 2:28 AM Author: Live from Plymouth! (Prestige Feuds) What? I don't even understand this critique but I can elaborate if you want. I cited the preeminent leader in the field. I believe his testimony. I can't argue it as well as he can, I'm not a doctor. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899869&forum_id=2,#50110268) |
|
Date: September 2nd, 2026 2:28 AM Author: Gay Grandpa You explained why insanity is a moral excuse: irresistible impulse. The concept is unfalsifiable and undefinable (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899869&forum_id=2,#50110269) |
|
Date: September 2nd, 2026 2:29 AM Author: Live from Plymouth! (Prestige Feuds) Nonresponsive (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899869&forum_id=2,#50110270) |
|
Date: September 2nd, 2026 2:31 AM Author: Gay Grandpa Edited (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899869&forum_id=2,#50110271) |
|
Date: September 2nd, 2026 2:37 AM Author: Live from Plymouth! (Prestige Feuds) I'm not an expert on psychiatry. It is unfalsifiable but our national leader in the field believes it and that has given me peace to believe it. Google Dr. Phillip Resnick. He worked on countless high profile cases. Dahmer, unabomber, Andrea Yates, Casey Anthony. This dood is a genius. So yeah maybe I can't explain it but you should watch his testimony. He has interviewed the most deranged killers and studied them. He has come out for both sides depending on the trial. He is not known to lie or make shit up. His reputation is gold and if he believes it I can believe it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899869&forum_id=2,#50110275) |
|
Date: September 2nd, 2026 2:49 AM Author: The Scrotum (gunneratttt) Countless experts in psychiatry would testify that Karmelo was not in control of himself and could not resist his impulses. The circumstances show he had even less control and behaved completely erratically. Are you willing to let oeople like Karmelo off so long as a professor testifies they weren't in control? Surely you realize there's no shortage of academics that would do so. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899869&forum_id=2,#50110280) |
|
Date: September 2nd, 2026 2:55 AM Author: Live from Plymouth! (Prestige Feuds) "Countless experts in psychiatry would testify..."
And yet, they did not. Not even one. Are you arguing for IAC? Is this grounds for appeal? |
|
Date: September 2nd, 2026 3:00 AM Author: VoteRepublican (A true Chad!! where's your gf/wifew?) it seems like most ppl arent in their right mind driven to crazy impulse when they do extreme violence ...
only reason why i think its ok for this case is becasue she lost her children + paraplegic if she didnt get paraplegic shes 100% cooked |
|
Date: September 2nd, 2026 3:03 AM Author: Live from Plymouth! (Prestige Feuds) Definitely a huge factor here. Prosecution made a major misstep in arguing she faked her suicide. On retrial they will say the suicide attempt was real but that doesn't justify killing your kids. The prosecution benefits majorly in a retrial. There were so many mistakes they could have cleared up. They might get a conviction next time. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899869&forum_id=2,#50110288) |
|
Date: September 2nd, 2026 3:05 AM Author: VoteRepublican (A true Chad!! where's your gf/wifew?) can u do a literature review of similar case by schizophrenia/postpartum/low iq ppl because i feel like schizophrenia and low iq easier to see the guy cannot know right or wrong postpartum u just got thru so much its harder to see (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899869&forum_id=2,#50110290) |
|
Date: September 2nd, 2026 3:01 AM Author: The Scrotum (gunneratttt) I'm asking you why you'd trust the experts in this case but not others even though there is even more evidence they had no ability to resist their impulses. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899869&forum_id=2,#50110287) |
|
Date: September 2nd, 2026 3:05 AM Author: Live from Plymouth! (Prestige Feuds) Link to evidence in the Karmelo trial that he was not mentally sane or in control? You bring up countless shrinks who would testify. Not one testified. I go case by case here. Show me the relevant testimony. You can't demand I debate you about testimony that wasn't presented. Lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899869&forum_id=2,#50110291) |
|
Date: September 2nd, 2026 3:04 AM Author: which is what makes time travel possible karmelo is a threat to the general public. as long as foid doesn't have any more kids, she won't murder any more kids. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899869&forum_id=2,#50110289) |