Can Men Get Pregnant?
| razzle-dazzle dopamine home | 05/04/22 | | sepia mexican | 05/04/22 | | Emerald station | 05/04/22 | | Internet-worthy razzle whorehouse jewess | 05/04/22 | | Emerald station | 05/04/22 | | Internet-worthy razzle whorehouse jewess | 05/04/22 | | Galvanic painfully honest stag film mad cow disease | 05/04/22 | | frum parlor | 05/04/22 | | sepia mexican | 05/04/22 | | exciting confused gay wizard fanboi | 05/04/22 | | Big Sandwich | 01/14/26 | | Big Sandwich | 01/14/26 | | Big Sandwich | 01/15/26 | | Big Sandwich | 01/15/26 | | Big Sandwich | 01/19/26 | | Big Sandwich | 01/20/26 | | nyuug | 01/25/26 | | nyuug | 01/25/26 | | nyuug | 01/27/26 | | Stirring elastic band nursing home | 01/14/26 | | citrine main people locus | 01/15/26 | | Glittery slippery twinkling uncleanness cuck | 01/15/26 | | vigorous carmine generalized bond cuckold | 01/19/26 | | 6 7 | 01/25/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 4th, 2022 2:28 PM Author: sepia mexican
"With our understanding constantly evolving, it’s important to honor the fact that one’s gender doesn’t determine whether they can become pregnant. Many men have had children of their own, and many more will likely do so in the future."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5101418&forum_id=2,#44454608)
|
Date: May 4th, 2022 2:36 PM Author: Internet-worthy razzle whorehouse jewess
“To our knowledge, there has not yet been a case of pregnancy in [a biologically male] individual.”
Is the “to our knowledge” qualifier really necessary here?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5101418&forum_id=2,#44454641) |
 |
Date: January 15th, 2026 7:18 PM Author: citrine main people locus
Pregnancy via the abdominal cavity
It has also been suggested that it may be possible for AMAB folks to carry a baby in the abdominal cavity.
People have made this leap based on the fact that a very tiny percentage of eggs are fertilized outside of the uterus in what is known as an ectopic pregnancy.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5101418&forum_id=2,#49592650) |
Date: January 15th, 2026 7:14 PM Author: Glittery slippery twinkling uncleanness cuck
why won't shitlibs testifying before congress and scotus say what they mean: "man" and "woman" is purely psychological, can be chosen and changed at will by the individual, and is not subject to review. it is objectively meaningless. but then it's an invalid class for the purpose of the law - if you can't define it you can't distinguish it, and if you can't distinguish it you can't protect it. next up: whites start identifying as black on college applications and government contracts.
and why don't republicans just steal their language and define "woman" as "a person with a uterus and ovaries"? or "a person with xx chromosomes?"
this shit is so silly. what a joke of a country.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5101418&forum_id=2,#49592636) |
|
|