The remakes of 80s Schwarzenegger films are all failures
| gaped razzmatazz den | 12/18/25 | | burgundy nofapping sound barrier | 12/18/25 | | abusive jet hell hunting ground | 12/18/25 | | Federal chrome property | 12/18/25 | | abusive jet hell hunting ground | 12/18/25 | | harsh roast beef brethren | 12/20/25 | | Motley psychic | 12/20/25 | | Sable marketing idea | 12/18/25 | | abusive jet hell hunting ground | 12/18/25 | | Sable marketing idea | 12/20/25 | | Sadistic garrison pistol | 12/20/25 | | Sable marketing idea | 12/20/25 | | histrionic jet-lagged corner | 12/20/25 | | learning disabled volcanic crater | 12/20/25 | | harsh roast beef brethren | 12/20/25 | | lemon legend parlor | 12/20/25 | | lemon legend parlor | 12/20/25 | | dark fragrant center wrinkle | 12/20/25 | | unholy cheese-eating tank | 12/20/25 | | harsh roast beef brethren | 12/20/25 | | Frozen cracking filthpig | 12/20/25 | | dark fragrant center wrinkle | 12/20/25 | | rusted stain pit | 12/20/25 | | Bisexual step-uncle's house | 12/20/25 | | Trip Tanning Salon | 12/20/25 | | Concupiscible ratface | 12/20/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 18th, 2025 1:13 PM Author: abusive jet hell hunting ground
It's retarded to remake his movies because his unique personality was what made the mediocre source material good.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5811706&forum_id=2,#49519436)
|
Date: December 18th, 2025 1:28 PM Author: Sable marketing idea
Tons of movies fail horribly nowadays. The box office “bombs” of old such as Waterworld would still make back their budgets.
Blade Runner (1982) — Budget: ~$28M | Box Office: ~$41.5M
The Thing (1982) — Budget: ~$15M | Box Office: ~$19.6M
Scarface (1983) — Budget: ~$25M | Box Office: ~$66M
Once Upon a Time in America (1984) — Budget: ~$30M | Box Office: ~$5.3M (US), ~$43M worldwide
The Shawshank Redemption (1994) — Budget: ~$25M | Box Office: ~$28.3M
Fight Club (1999) — Budget: ~$63M | Box Office: ~$101M
Eyes Wide Shut (1999) — Budget: ~$65M | Box Office: ~$162M
Batman Returns (1992) — Budget: ~$80M | Box Office: ~$266M
Waterworld (1995) — Budget: ~$172M | Box Office: ~$264M
Hook (1991) — Budget: ~$70M | Box Office: ~$300.9M
The Rocketeer (1991) — Budget: ~$40M | Box Office: ~$46.7M
Last Action Hero (1993) — Budget: ~$85M | Box Office: ~$137M
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5811706&forum_id=2,#49519481) |
Date: December 20th, 2025 8:00 AM Author: lemon legend parlor
Pre-Covid annual box office sales were over $40bn a year. Now its less than $8bn. The industry is DEAD. Streaming is not really saving it either because TV used to make GAZILLIONS off advertising and advertising is DEAD and the $20 from everyone is not covering the money bleed. The entire industry is fucked beyond words and that's before AI has even started reaping.
They did it to themselves but sidelining anything white and male.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5811706&forum_id=2,#49524598) |
 |
Date: December 20th, 2025 8:57 PM Author: dark fragrant center wrinkle
No, the claim is not true—it's a significant exaggeration based on outdated or misinterpreted data.
Box Office Revenue
Pre-COVID: Global theatrical box office reached a record $42.5 billion in 2019 (sources: Comscore, Hollywood Reporter, Box Office Mojo).
Post-COVID recovery:
2023: ~$33.9 billion
2024: ~$30 billion (down slightly due to fewer releases from 2023 strikes and uneven performance in markets like China)
2025 projection: $33–34 billion (on track for growth)
The industry took a massive hit during COVID (dropping to ~$21 billion in 2021), but it's recovering steadily, though still ~20–30% below 2019 peaks. It's not "less than $8bn"—that's wildly inaccurate (even U.S. domestic alone was ~$8.7 billion in 2024). Theatrical isn't "dead"; big hits like Inside Out 2 ($1.7B) and Deadpool & Wolverine ($1.3B) proved event movies still draw crowds, but mid-budget films and consistent releases have shrunk.
Streaming and Overall Entertainment Revenue
Streaming has exploded and is highly profitable:
The global video streaming market was worth hundreds of billions in 2024 (e.g., ~$674 billion total, including subscriptions and ads).
Major platforms like Netflix alone had tens of billions in revenue, with growing ad tiers boosting profits (Netflix's ad-supported plan often generates higher ARPU than pure subscriptions in some cases).
Hybrid models (subscriptions + ads) are thriving, with ad revenue projected to make up ~28% of streaming income by 2028.
Traditional linear TV advertising has declined (global TV ad spend dipped post-pandemic and is flatter now, around $130–140 billion annually vs. higher peaks pre-streaming dominance), but overall video/entertainment ad revenue has shifted to digital/CTV/streaming, which is growing rapidly. Subscriptions from millions of users worldwide easily offset much of the "bleed"—the industry adapted, not collapsed.
Is the Industry "Dead" or "Fucked"?
No—theatrical is challenged and evolving (fewer films, more reliance on blockbusters), production slowed in 2024 (post-strikes, economic caution), and jobs have been hit hard (high unemployment in crew/creative roles). But total entertainment/media revenue (theatrical + streaming + TV) is massive and growing in many segments. AI will disrupt (e.g., VFX, writing), but it's not "reaping" yet—the industry is transforming, not dying.
In short: Struggling in parts? Yes. Dead and bleeding out irreparably? Far from it. Recovery is ongoing, driven by hits and streaming profitability.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5811706&forum_id=2,#49526414) |
Date: December 20th, 2025 11:29 PM Author: Trip Tanning Salon
These weren't great movies originally so i don't find it surprising at all.
Like 90% of people never saw the first one - so why would these people see a remake if they never bothered to see the original
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5811706&forum_id=2,#49526741) |
|
|