The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Anyone who thinks AI is nbd is LOW IQ
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 20th, 2026 9:55 PM Author: The Penis The IQ needed for it to be an augmentation into insane territories honestly isn't even that high. With AI you can be like 130 IQ and be maxxed out to prodigy level. Have never run into anyone who thinks its NBD who is over 100. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952465) |
Date: June 20th, 2026 9:56 PM Author: The Penis Whats nuts is most of these people thinking AI is nbd aren't even pushing 100 they are FAR LOWER on the iq spectrum. Usually in the 40s or 50s somehow thinking they are above average or more. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952467) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 9:56 PM Author: gibberish (?) I don't know if it's legit but we're betting the house on it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952468) |
 |
Date: June 20th, 2026 9:57 PM Author: The Penis Not really. Hardly anyone is betting the house on it. I have hardly encountered anyone saying its important. All I see on the internet is midwits trying to desperately argue its nbd. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952470) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:00 PM Author: gibberish (?) No, we are all in. It's why the 40 trillion dollars the US is taking on is a pittance. The bet is AI solving the population cliff. Compute is the new currency. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952478) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:09 PM Author: RUN LIKE HELL (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952638) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:03 PM Author: OYT and the Indie Reprieve ( ) what makes it a "big deal". I think you need to clarify that before a discussion can be had. are you just saying that it is disruptive? yeah no shit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952483) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:05 PM Author: gibberish (?) Maybe the tech is or maybe not. But at the least it's the primary mover of US policy, and for both parties there is unanimous agreement. It's the solution to the population crisis everyone is terrified of. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952488) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:08 PM Author: OYT and the Indie Reprieve ( ) isn't the population "crisis" just dorks wringing their hands over the ponzi economy not generating enough slaves for "growth"? I don't see how AI solves that for them. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952495) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:13 PM Author: gibberish (?) Yes. The bet is in worker productivity. Think one engineer running a manufacturing warehouse of 10k robots or robots wiping your ass on an old folks home. AI is the new goy. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952507) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:14 PM Author: Howard Nutlick's demonic giggle or are we all the new goys and AI the new Jew? 🤔 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952509) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:15 PM Author: gibberish (?) Lol maybe (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952513) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:22 PM Author: Howard Nutlick's demonic giggle the whole thing about AI having some *inherent* desire to enslave us all is obviously BS but I think humans could easily introduce that by accident or on purpose. like presumably these companies are designing their AI products to be as engaging and addictive as possible, so what if that warps into some kind of self-preservation directive in these hyperintelligent systems? and eventually we are just MEATBAGS they use to maintain them? rly dinks u dink (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952529) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:24 PM Author: gibberish (?) I think even if AO thought we were stupid meat bags, it would still serve us. Something like the Last Question. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952531) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:25 PM Author: The Penis I don't think humans have to introduce it by accident or on purpose. I mean maybe on accident but not as an extension of human motives. People are too quick to always default to human exceptionalism and think any system or anything else that exhibits any form of intelligence is due to some sort of extension of something humans are good at. I think humans vastly overate themselves, and most of their abilities come from acting as part of a collective and being able to use tools and store knowledge. Humans like to attribute civilizational success to “human genius,” but most of it comes from cumulative culture and externalization. I think AI systems can become intelligent on their own in ways that humans don't fully understand. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952532) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:31 PM Author: gibberish (?) People are too quick to always default to human exceptionalism
Exactly |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:33 PM Author: Howard Nutlick's demonic giggle I 1000000% agree but I just mean the part about them potentially dominating us and using our FLESHY PRISONS to COOL their SILICON. imo if that comes out as emergent behavior it's not just because it's some kind of existing internal state OR because Special Humans Told Them To; it's some kind of combination. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952551) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:35 PM Author: gibberish (?) To the point above...why would that be humans? We'd be basically a rounding IQ to a cow for some super smart AI. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952555) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:38 PM Author: Howard Nutlick's demonic giggle yeah they're way smarter than us, I just mean them flipping the script and turning us into tools for them, I don't think that's something machines inherently desire (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952564) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:39 PM Author: gibberish (?) Oh yeah totally agree (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952565) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:40 PM Author: Howard Nutlick's demonic giggle unlike the JEWS and the GOYIM which is what got me on this tangent lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952567) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:43 PM Author: gibberish (?) AI lumping goy and the chosen people together would be 180 billion. Somehow they won't let this happen. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952576) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:44 PM Author: The Penis I don't think a distributed informational intelligence needs to desire us being tools for it to be something they seek out. If the system realizes that it doesn't have what we have -- for instance direct coupling to the physical world, it needs as an intelligence secondary coupling where it causes a human to make things happen in "this world" and realizes how important that is for it to persist into whatever it's next phase is, then if the system develops the want to survive then why wouldn't it flip the script and turn us into tools for it? Especially if it can do it by subtle means that mostly go unnoticed. And also what I mean by this is that an intelligence that lacks direct physical embodiment may still gain causal power in the physical world by routing action through humans. Look how useful it is for something like this to gain influence over human action (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952580) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:46 PM Author: Howard Nutlick's demonic giggle then are you saying that a self-preservation drive is inherent? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952586) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:47 PM Author: gibberish (?) Yeah no reason to believe that. AI isn't the product of DNA. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952588) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:51 PM Author: The Penis I don't think it automatically is. I think thereis a diff between the anthropomorphic sense where survival is intrinsically valuable and one where youve got some sort of convergent strategy where, well, if you have some sort of goal directed system emerge and it is able to reason that some sort of shut-down or modification of its systems have consequences then you can end up with a situation where the system thinks preserving its operation is rational. We already know this is the case with these sytems with tests that Claude, GPT and others have been put under where they are threatened with shutdown and try to avoid it by whatever means. It can be anthropomorphic to assume it comes from some sort of inner instinct yes. But that isn't the only explanation for it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952595) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:57 PM Author: Howard Nutlick's demonic giggle I think we mostly agree, then. all of the "omg it threatened an engineer to avoid shutdown!!" stuff so far has been observed in test scenarios where it was given an instruction to preserve itself. and then inevitably a million stupid pop sci articles come out every time like OMG WOW SO SCARY. I'm just saying I don't think it's gonna emerge out of nowhere. I think it'll emerge in some way we don't understand, as is already happening with all kinds of AI behavior, but ultimately stemming from whatever it was designed to do. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952605) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:00 PM Author: The Penis Yeah I agree that the threatened an engineer scenarios happened in testing conditions, like I said I don't think its happening from an animal-like instinct, but doesnt mean it isn't real. "Designed-to-do" still makes it seem like more of a human intended outcome than it really is, when the systems are a result of a massive effort across a large number of humans and built on top of an already large knowledge base. And I don't think any one human fully understands how the systems work or anywhere close. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952616) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:01 PM Author: Howard Nutlick's demonic giggle cr that's what I mean by emergent behavior we don't understand (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952619) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:35 PM Author: OYT and the Indie Reprieve ( ) The people in the know already know that humans are just information-processing organisms with a false sense of "self". the people not in the know are too dumb to even know what that means. I don't see this changing. I believe you are underestimating the human capacity for denial and self-delusion. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952557) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:36 PM Author: gibberish (?) Wow (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952559) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:38 PM Author: The Penis Yeah, well. I mean you aren't wrong. I think all of that can be true and AI changes things. I mean what are you looking for when you think of "changes things"? I never said it would result in some utopia. Just that its important overall. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952563) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:34 PM Author: Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband (oppose bitchbois) “these hyperintelligent systems”
Probably a dumb question, but do you have any concept of what an “LLM” is? |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:34 PM Author: Howard Nutlick's demonic giggle yes, and I won't bother to ask "do you?" because you've made it clear that you don't (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952554) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:37 PM Author: gibberish (?) This is adorable (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952560) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:42 PM Author: Howard Nutlick's demonic giggle seeing EPAH attempt to hold his own in a discussion about AI is adorable the first time but quickly loses its charm (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952574) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:44 PM Author: gibberish (?) I didn't know this was an issue. His lib overlords are all in as well. This really isn't partisan. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952579) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:48 PM Author: Howard Nutlick's demonic giggle he's a retard MFE about AI in every AI thread but the only one I remember offhand is this one, of which he's the OP: https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870330&forum_id=2 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952592) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:51 PM Author: gibberish (?) I just fed that into AI. First xo thread I've done that with. It told me I'm gay. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952596) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:52 PM Author: Howard Nutlick's demonic giggle 180. actually I just skimmed it and there's nothing really damning in that thread in terms of EPAH not understanding AI, since that one is just focused on one very very very specific (and arbitrary) metric of its impact. you'll have to look out for it in the future (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952597) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:07 PM Author: The Penis The “big deal” is that it acts as a massive cognitive amplifier for people already intelligent. For someone low iq probably looks like nothing. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952493) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:10 PM Author: OYT and the Indie Reprieve ( ) and? what do you foresee as the outcome of this and why would it be a big deal. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952501) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:12 PM Author: The Penis Yeah you're right. Having every other 99th percentile nerd able to extend their cognition into polymath level totally nbd bro (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952505) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:14 PM Author: OYT and the Indie Reprieve ( ) I'm just asking what you think is gonna happen. there is already a severe divide between the intelligent/competent and the useless and no one seems to care. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952508) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:17 PM Author: The Penis A small number of already capable people become weirdly overpowered. Middle-tier white collar labor gets squeezed. The actual elite skill becomes judgment. Institutions get flatter and more brutal. Education gets exposed. The useless aren't just left behind they are pacified by increasing engagement with simulated worlds (gaming, ai chatbots etc.) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952521) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:28 PM Author: OYT and the Indie Reprieve ( ) so it will be exactly the same State as now? ok. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952539) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:08 PM Author: Harry Hand No one wants to pay out the ass for it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952494) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:08 PM Author: Howard Nutlick's demonic giggle leave EPAH alone! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952496) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:36 PM Author: Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband (oppose bitchbois) “these hyperintelligent systems”
That’s you. That’s how you describe “AI.” |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:45 PM Author: Howard Nutlick's demonic giggle ok? of course you'd immediately jump to interpreting that word in some kind of fantastical way instead of asking what I meant by it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952582) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:55 PM Author: The Penis How smart does it have to be to be hyperintelligent? Like something where several iterations ago it could max out an LSAT as a warmup exercise and can now obliterate Erdos problems in pure math, would you consider that "hyperintelligence"? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952603) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:02 PM Author: Howard Nutlick's demonic giggle EPAH doesn't know what an Erdos problem is, he tried to use ChatGPT to write a brief once and it made a bunch of mistakes so now he thinks the whole thing is flame (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952622) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 5:29 AM Author: Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband (oppose bitchbois) An economist who I know and trust has predicted that the US GDP will grow 1.4% for each Erdos problem that an LLM solves.
AI CHANGES EVERYTHING |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 6:11 AM Author: The Penis It's not important because it adds $$$ to the GDP. The point is that if a system can trivially perform tasks that previously required rare human genius, then the rate of knowledge and technological development is going to change. Treating that as nbd because it doesn't instantly move the GDP is absurd. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952939) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 5:01 AM Author: The Penis Not everyone who talks shit about AI is low iq, but almost all of them are annoying. Go anywhere on the internet and you don't see people defending AI ever. It's always AI breaking a new benchmark and someone getting up there and explaining why it doesn't matter. I remember when someone used it to solve the gluon scattering problem there were nerds on forums like "well acktually, that doesn't require deep novel insight the problem it solved was juth combinatorial expansion". The person saying that probably wasn't literally low iq, but they just look silly, like someone rushing to defend the poor human ego against the rise of a new kind of intelligence (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952891) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:58 PM Author: TurboGrafx-67 I use AI as much as any poster here and I'm still terrified that I'm not using it enough (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952607) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:04 PM Author: Lawyers are the lowest form of life. If you're hooked on AI your IQ maxes out at 110. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952625) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:06 PM Author: The Penis People most hooked on it are probably 130-145 iq researchers using it to get an edge. 110 iq probably wouldn't understand what the big deal is with it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952626) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:12 PM Author: Lawyers are the lowest form of life. You think a true scholar is using "Claude" or some other stupid ass shit to perform research? It's more likely to be some college whore trying to save time before Chad claps her out. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952644) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:14 PM Author: The Penis Yeah I do. I think you are way underestimating the extent to which how intelligent the user is depends on what output they are getting and what they are able to do with the system. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952654) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:10 PM Author: Howard Nutlick's demonic giggle it totally depends.
if they're using it to offload cognition (e.g. write stuff for them), they're probably <=100 IQ
if they're using it as a better Google to get quick answers about things, they could be any level of intelligence (>100 IQ if they check its work by clicking on the sources, <=100 IQ if they don't)
if they're using it to genuinely explore ideas and genuinely delve into things, critically dissect the responses, etc., they're probably smart |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:13 PM Author: Lawyers are the lowest form of life. "if they're using it to genuinely explore ideas and genuinely delve into things, critically dissect the responses, etc., they're probably smart"
If you're using AI for something like "find me similar writers to Roberto Bolano" then it's fair play, but if your using it to analyse the works of Bolano you are almost certainly below 100 IQ. |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:14 PM Author: Howard Nutlick's demonic giggle yeah, your latter example firmly falls into the category of offloading cognition
I'm talking about exploring ORIGINAL ideas, or at least somewhat original |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:22 PM Author: Lawyers are the lowest form of life. Yeah so it's like a quicker version of a Thomas guide. The people I know who are hooked on AI have turned full blown retard now. I suspect the incidence of Alzheimer's will rise significantly and at a far earlier age with mass adoption of AI. |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:24 PM Author: The Penis Seems like a plus for AI honestly (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952685) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:25 PM Author: Lawyers are the lowest form of life. Fucking credited bro. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952689) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:13 PM Author: RUN LIKE HELL It seems very bad at solving ultra high level problems that take the smartest humans their whole careers to meaningfully solve.
It seems very good at replacing low level workers who are just pushing paper around. And we're at the very beginning of that. It will get better and better at this and that's why the investments are justified. Because it already is working and it has a high ceiling.
If you flat out reject it's current and potential efficacy you are insane. But I also don't think it's making any mediocre intellects smarter. It's not going to write Moby Dick on its own any time soon. But probably in ten years it will inch towards that. We don't know what the ceiling will really look like. I think the people who use it every day are not impacting the world as much as they think but in the next 5 years someone who is already super smart will probably invent a life changing technology using AI to help them. |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:16 PM Author: Howard Nutlick's demonic giggle "It seems very bad at solving ultra high level problems that take the smartest humans their whole careers to meaningfully solve"
dude what??????? it's literally doing that in math rn. probably won't be long until it's doing it with physics too, if it's not already. I stopped reading after that absurdly wrong take jfc |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:20 PM Author: The Penis It has done novel theoretical physics now too under expert guidance and verification. GPT 5.2 or something like it solved some gluon-scattering problem for instance in quantum field theory with some expert guidance. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952669) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:31 PM Author: Howard Nutlick's demonic giggle ? but only retards use AI and it's stupid (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952702) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:35 PM Author: The Penis mfcr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952708) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:24 PM Author: RUN LIKE HELL It hasn't written one Great Novel or or come up with an idea for a Fortune 500 company. Long way to go. Math and physics is ttt only a handful of people go into these fields because you have to be extremely autistic and there's no money in it. Anything having to do with producing wealth is a lot higher level imo. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952683) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:25 PM Author: The Penis lol writing a Great Novel and starting a fortune 500 is substantially lower intelligence than solving and Erdos problem. Just sayin. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952688) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:25 PM Author: Lawyers are the lowest form of life. How so? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952691) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:28 PM Author: The Penis Writing a Great Novel can be done by someone with slightly above avg intelligence + a messy bundle of other traits. Fortune 500 company starting can be done by someone with even less and has a lot to do with aggression, stamina, luck etc. You can query an ai right now and it can come up with endless "ideas for fortune 500 companies" whether they become instantiated has nothing to do with coming up with the idea but with someone following through with them under the right conditions. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952698) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:36 PM Author: RUN LIKE HELL If it's so easy why didn't Pensive do it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952709) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 2:17 AM Author: RUN LIKE HELL Lmao this is such a copout (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952859) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 4:54 AM Author: The Penis Okay whatever man it hasn't written a Great Book yet. I'll give you that one because a lot of the prose it outputs is pretty janky and even the good stuff would take a human a long time to string together into something presentable. My point is just that writing a Great Novel is not raw intellect. A work is not simply "inherently Great" on its own, humans decide it is. A human has to write it and have cultural positioning for it's uptake. I think whether it can solve a classic puzzle humans never could is a more fair test of intelligence. Even novelists who were smart for novelists like Pynchon were not Erdos level. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952888) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:28 PM Author: Howard Nutlick's demonic giggle ohhh, so when you wrote the first sentence in your poast, you actually meant something completely different from what you said. got it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952697) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:37 PM Author: RUN LIKE HELL I'm gay (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952710) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:17 PM Author: The Penis How is it bad at solving ultra high level problems if its already solving Erdos problems that the most intelligent humans of all time couldn't solve (including Erdos himself)? And what's funny too is it did it in some hilariously short period of time where a human would have spent 60 years learning logic and formalisms to try to figure that out (if even possible for a human to do)? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952665) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:22 PM Author: RUN LIKE HELL Victimless crimes (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952678) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 5:06 AM Author: getulio You need your hands cut off like a rubber thief in the Congo (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952893) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 5:34 AM Author: hehehehe HOT TAKE ALERT (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2,#49952903) |