Why did Hillary refuse to go to "Wisconsin" ?
| Amber Passionate Toilet Seat | 06/28/22 | | Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e | 07/17/26 | | Godawful Canary Place Of Business | 06/28/22 | | Amber Passionate Toilet Seat | 06/28/22 | | Amber Passionate Toilet Seat | 06/28/22 | | Amber Passionate Toilet Seat | 06/28/22 | | violent hominid quadroon | 06/28/22 | | Amber Passionate Toilet Seat | 06/28/22 | | Electric slippery mental disorder feces | 06/28/22 | | cerebral voyeur | 06/28/22 | | Frum metal degenerate marketing idea | 06/28/22 | | fuchsia pozpig | 06/28/22 | | Trip lilac trust fund field | 06/28/22 | | insane national security agency | 06/28/22 | | Arousing carnelian preventive strike den | 06/28/22 | | diverse know-it-all station hunting ground | 06/28/22 | | copper aromatic library | 06/28/22 | | Jet marvelous hall | 06/28/22 | | Crusty center | 06/28/22 | | Glassy motley garrison | 06/28/22 | | Swashbuckling organic girlfriend roast beef | 06/28/22 | | Amethyst up-to-no-good sanctuary nowag | 06/28/22 | | Amber Passionate Toilet Seat | 07/08/22 | | Amber Passionate Toilet Seat | 10/18/22 | | Amber Passionate Toilet Seat | 10/26/22 | | Amber Passionate Toilet Seat | 11/19/22 | | Amber Passionate Toilet Seat | 01/21/23 | | Well-lubricated Stead Son Of Senegal | 01/21/23 | | Amber Passionate Toilet Seat | 01/21/23 | | Amber Passionate Toilet Seat | 09/12/23 | | Amber Passionate Toilet Seat | 09/16/23 | | excitant trailer park ladyboy | 09/06/24 | | Sexy Therapy | 09/06/24 | | Amber Passionate Toilet Seat | 10/18/24 | | cerebral voyeur | 10/18/24 | | Amber Passionate Toilet Seat | 04/19/25 | | Amber Passionate Toilet Seat | 04/27/25 | | Amber Passionate Toilet Seat | 11/21/25 | | Godawful Canary Place Of Business | 11/21/25 | | cerebral voyeur | 11/21/25 | | Laughsome Magical Trump Supporter | 06/28/22 | | alcoholic parlor | 10/27/22 | | Wild territorial kitchen | 06/28/22 | | Poppy Party Of The First Part | 06/28/22 | | glittery lime headpube | 06/28/22 | | self-centered irradiated azn electric furnace | 10/18/22 | | Multi-colored church building private investor | 09/16/23 | | Amber Passionate Toilet Seat | 09/06/24 | | Amber Passionate Toilet Seat | 09/06/24 | | Amber Passionate Toilet Seat | 09/06/24 | | cerebral voyeur | 10/18/24 | | cerebral voyeur | 11/21/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 28th, 2022 1:13 AM Author: Godawful Canary Place Of Business
Brooklyn grew weary of endless field requests for signs and pamphlets, and insisted that big data would win the state for Clinton.
"I don't want to hear any more crap about volunteers or door knocking in Wisconsin, okay?" snapped an angry Mook after a particularly heated conference call. "The computer says Wisconsin is solid blue, got it? Solid blue!" he yelled.
Others were horrified when Mook sank $1.7 million into an app designed to energize the transgender vote in California, a state where Clinton already held an enormous lead. After Trump's election, it was revealed that the app yielded only eighteen new voter registrations, or approximately $94,000 per vote.
http://politico.com/election2016/mook-and-dnc-were-overconfident-from-the-start.htm
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5141308&forum_id=2,#44757342) |
Date: September 6th, 2024 1:20 PM Author: Amber Passionate Toilet Seat
Mainlining’s use of quotes around “Wisconsin” is intriguing, and it feels like a subtle or ironic jab. The quotes might imply that "Wisconsin" represents something larger, perhaps a symbol of the Clinton campaign’s perceived neglect of key battleground states. By using quotes, Mainlining could be suggesting that the campaign viewed Wisconsin as a kind of abstract, irrelevant place—almost fictional in their strategy. Alternatively, it might play into a broader skepticism, implying the Clinton campaign treated Wisconsin's political importance as something unreal, which could reflect how the state was overlooked in her campaign.
As for Evan39’s fictional news excerpt, the humor lies in its clever satire of what some perceived as the mismanagement of Clinton's 2016 campaign. Evan39 captures this by caricaturing campaign manager Robby Mook, portraying him as overly reliant on data and dismissive of grassroots efforts. The line “The computer says Wisconsin is solid blue, got it? Solid blue!” mocks the overconfidence some believed the campaign had in their analytics, while ignoring more practical, boots-on-the-ground campaigning.
The exaggerated detail about spending $1.7 million on an app to mobilize the transgender vote in California—a state Clinton already dominated—amplifies the absurdity. It underscores Evan39’s critique that resources were wasted on areas that didn’t need attention, at the expense of battleground states like Wisconsin. The $94,000-per-vote calculation is an over-the-top punchline, heightening the absurdity and inefficiency.
Evan39’s fake hyperlink at the end—“http://politico.com/election2016/mook-and-dnc-were-overconfident-from-the-start.htm”—is a signature move of his, giving the post a veneer of authenticity while letting the reader know it’s entirely fabricated. It mirrors the way headlines might sound in real outlets like Politico or The New York Times, but it's his way of slyly blending fiction with the style of real reporting.
Overall, both Mainlining and Evan39 are tapping into a shared skepticism and dark humor surrounding the 2016 election, with each using different tools to express their critique.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5141308&forum_id=2,#48056876) |
|
|