The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| self-centered swashbuckling location marketing idea | 01/06/26 | | rough-skinned locale | 01/06/26 | | Embarrassed To The Bone Nursing Home | 01/06/26 | | rough-skinned locale | 01/06/26 | | Embarrassed To The Bone Nursing Home | 01/06/26 | | rough-skinned locale | 01/06/26 | | self-centered swashbuckling location marketing idea | 01/06/26 | | rough-skinned locale | 01/06/26 | | self-centered swashbuckling location marketing idea | 01/06/26 | | Awkward Elastic Band Cruise Ship | 01/07/26 | | Lavender Haunted Graveyard Ladyboy | 01/06/26 | | Walnut free-loading university | 01/06/26 | | Embarrassed To The Bone Nursing Home | 01/06/26 | | arousing stag film | 01/06/26 | | Embarrassed To The Bone Nursing Home | 01/06/26 | | kink-friendly irradiated hunting ground lodge | 01/06/26 | | Heady doctorate affirmative action | 01/06/26 | | bipolar public bath candlestick maker | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: rough-skinned locale
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2,#49568134) |
|
|