https://x.com/guyelster/status/2039711285890166897

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5852732&forum_id=2/#49788775)

and you really should have no faith in government or media narratives after your job forced you to get the jewish heart attack jab, after iraq WMDs, after the 20 year afghanistan fraud, etc.

you seem to suffer from what michael crichton called the gell-mann amnesia effect

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5852732&forum_id=2/#49788826)

dude, i don't care what iran does to its citizens or to the middle east. it's half a world away. if they killed 1 million of its citizens there would still be no reason to attack it. this world is fallen and no action taken by our government or otherwise will ever make it equitable. the U.S. has no reason to attack iran other than israel controlling the orange retard and as an excuse for great reset energy lockdowns.

your brain seems to be really scrambled man

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5852732&forum_id=2/#49788994)

You are aware that Iran has had designs to control this area of the world for decades now and after the Brits pulled back in the 50s that vacuum could have easily let them go buckwild. This didn't start in 1979.

What's your alternative? If the US wasn't there these people would all be getting along and wouldn't use their monopoly on global energy to exert more power? You don't care about that? We drew up plans to even invade Saudi arabia during the embargo in the 70s.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5852732&forum_id=2/#49789038)

the mullahs are controlled puppets by higher level financial and state security forces, specifically the cia/mossad. they exist(ed) as a boogyman. you've read your preparata, you should know this.

"If the US wasn't there these people would all be getting along and wouldn't use their monopoly on global energy to exert more power? You don't care about that?"

no, given america is a net oil exporter and is not reliant on middle eastern energy for its energy needs.

this "isolationist" perspective was widespread pre-ww2 - see lindberg's america first movement, which was undermined by FDR's (((controllers))) who cut off japanese access to oil and forced the attack on pearl harbor (which FDR had advance knowledge about). you are basically a zionist neocon.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5852732&forum_id=2/#49789066)

I can't speak to who in particular is in actual control. The playbook is to not allow a truly sensible nationalistic group to take real power because that could turn into a legitimate threat to the system. The preference is a kind of fly-by-wire setup where the group allowed to administer are pretty whacky so that whoever really is in control only has to take their hands off the wheel for a second and it's a giant mess which is the pretext needed for the next regime to be subbed in. Ideally even the regime doesn't fully realize this. However, I see tension here too. Israel would like Iran fractured into permanent chaos while it seems like the US is trying to avoid that fate.

Oil is (((fungible))) and also the most manipulated commodity on the planet.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5852732&forum_id=2/#49789125)

again, you are buying into public reports of tension between the trump administration and israel.

this is fake news, israel controls trump like a man riding a donkey. there is no tension whatsoever. trump made a backroom deal to do what he was told in return for the fake criminal charges disappearing, for him to "win" the election, and to be allowed to grift billions of dollars through stock market and crypto and other corruption schemes. his kids are all married to jews and his grandchildren are all jewish.

regarding "permanent revolution", yes, the elites like to build up strongmen and then undermine and overthrow them. there is a logic to their madness as discussed here: https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/the-three-stages-of-integration-into

the upper elite are the rothschilds and other generational jewish families who own the world central banks. their goal is the establishment of greater israel, the rebuild of the third temple and to rule the world via the "externalization of the hierarchy" through a combination of programmable central bank digital currencies, woke AI using total information awareness to scan everyone's electronic footprint and assign social credit scores and cut out the noncompliant from society. we are almost there.

the purpose of the iran war is primarily to turn iran into libya so that it is not seen as a looming threat for investment into greater israel. the secondary objective is to create the incentives for expansion of oil pipelines from saudi arabia into israel and into europe:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/cf/IMEC_and_its_connections.png

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India%E2%80%93Middle_East%E2%80%93Europe_Economic_Corridor

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5852732&forum_id=2/#49789184)

"Iran’s leadership isn’t just infiltrated by Israeli and Western intelligence, as even mainstream reports now subtly acknowledge - it was engineered into its current form. The Shah, a Western-aligned monarch installed after his predecessor sought to nationalize Iran’s oil against the interests of international finance and corporate power, began questioning Zionist influence in the U.S. before his ouster, including making veiled references to AIPAC. Then, almost seamlessly, he was replaced by a group of exiled clerics - Khomeini among them - who had been living in Paris and London under Western intelligence protection. This regime swap, from secular monarch to Islamist theocracy, gave the illusion of anti-imperialist resistance while installing a system far more useful to elite control: centralized, ideological, emotionally inflamed, and easily scapegoated.3 Since then, Iran has served as a perfect foil: necessary for Israeli fear narratives, useful as a lightning rod, but never truly independent....

Several claims, patterns, and circumstantial data points have led some analysts, historians, and conspiracy theorists to suspect indirect facilitation or strategic tolerance of Khomeini's rise by Western intelligence, particularly in light of the following:

Publicly Known and Less Controversial Facts

Khomeini lived in the West before the revolution: He spent over a decade in exile, including time in France, where he had unrestricted access to media and communication tools. His sermons were recorded and broadcast into Iran with a degree of tolerance that raised some eyebrows. From Neauphle-le-Château, Khomeini's messages were widely disseminated, including through BBC Persian, which gave extensive and sympathetic coverage to him during the revolution, unlike its previous treatment of dissidents. Some interpret this as passive Western support, particularly from France and Britain.

The Carter administration's behavior: Some American officials saw Khomeini as less dangerous than the radical leftist groups in Iran. Declassified CIA assessments suggested Khomeini was not hostile to U.S. interests and that a clerical regime might be less volatile than other revolutionary alternatives. The Shah himself claimed that the United States was “betraying him” during the final months of his rule, and several memoirs from the period, including those by U.S. Ambassador William Sullivan, show a lack of support for the Shah from Carter's inner circle.

The Shah's downfall: The 1979 revolution was not seriously opposed by Western powers despite the fact that Iran was a major Cold War ally. Some view this as benign neglect or a managed transition, with Khomeini allowed to return under carefully watched conditions.

Claims, Suspicions, and Conspiratorial Readings

French Socialist Party figures, particularly François Mitterrand, allegedly had ties to revolutionary clerical circles. Some researchers claim Western powers preferred an Islamic revolution to a leftist or Soviet-aligned alternative.

F. William Engdahl, in books like Full Spectrum Dominance, and other authors from the anti-globalist right and left, have claimed that the revolution was allowed to proceed in order to restructure Iranian society in a way more compatible with a bifurcated East-West system — i.e., to maintain oil flow but destroy the Shah's aspirations toward full independence.

Some Middle Eastern political theorists, especially in Egypt and Syria, have long alleged that both Khomeini and the Muslim Brotherhood were permitted or aided by Western intelligence as a counterweight to Arab nationalism (Ba’athism, Nasserism), which was more secular and economically independent. See the devastating Iran/Iraq war launched shortly after the Ayatollahs took over which resulted in half a million dead, very useful for collapsing birthrates for both countries and dealing a heavy blow to masculine Islam on both sides."

from:

https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/greater-israel-is-happening-part

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5852732&forum_id=2/#49789277)

You have no credible evidence that many people died.

The “protestors” you are referring to were being armed by the US and Israel

You are lied to constantly

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5852732&forum_id=2/#49788831)

<10

how many would have died if terrorist scum didn't hide in hospitals and behind civilians?

<100

the enemy of palestinians are their own terrorists

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5852732&forum_id=2/#49788861)

https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/2039744702946107396

Demonic

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5852732&forum_id=2/#49789105)