\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

jackson dissents alone! maga!

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-539_fd9g.pdf
UN peacekeeper
  03/31/26
https://x.com/greg_price11/status/2038987647264207233?s=61
.;:..;:.;.:.;.,,,..,.:,.;....;,;;;..;,..,,.,,....,
  03/31/26
I AINT FINISH YET!
UhOh
  03/31/26
Kagan: The same may well be true of content-based but vie...
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
  03/31/26
...
peeface
  03/31/26
dat "supposedly" was a nice dig.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
  03/31/26
earlier this week, the majority was 7-0 and Soto and Jackson...
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
  03/31/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: March 31st, 2026 12:25 PM
Author: UN peacekeeper

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-539_fd9g.pdf

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5851952&forum_id=2/#49783103)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 31st, 2026 1:11 PM
Author: .;:..;:.;.:.;.,,,..,.:,.;....;,;;;..;,..,,.,,....,


https://x.com/greg_price11/status/2038987647264207233?s=61

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5851952&forum_id=2/#49783280)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 31st, 2026 1:33 PM
Author: UhOh

I AINT FINISH YET!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5851952&forum_id=2/#49783354)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 31st, 2026 1:27 PM
Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


Kagan:

The same may well be true of content-based but viewpoint-neutral laws regulating speech in doctors’ and counselors’ offices.*

——————

*JUSTICE JACKSON’s dissenting opinion claims that this is a small, or even nonexistent, category. See post, at 21–22, n. 8. But even her own opinion, when listing laws supposedly put at risk today, offers quite a few examples. See post, at 32–33, and n. 13. Her view to the contrary rests on reimagining—and in that way collapsing—the well-settled distinction between viewpoint-based and other content-based speech restrictions. See, e.g., Vidal v. Elster, 602 U. S. 286, 292–293 (2024) (explaining the difference).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5851952&forum_id=2/#49783328)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 31st, 2026 1:34 PM
Author: peeface



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5851952&forum_id=2/#49783361)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 31st, 2026 1:35 PM
Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


dat "supposedly" was a nice dig.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5851952&forum_id=2/#49783369)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 31st, 2026 1:30 PM
Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


earlier this week, the majority was 7-0 and Soto and Jackson would only concur in the judgment.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-171_bq7d.pdf

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5851952&forum_id=2/#49783339)