Renée is getting a gold coffin
| Aphrodisiac dilemma dopamine | 01/10/26 | | stimulating marketing idea kitty | 01/10/26 | | Aphrodisiac dilemma dopamine | 01/10/26 | | stimulating marketing idea kitty | 01/10/26 | | Aphrodisiac dilemma dopamine | 01/10/26 | | Bateful narrow-minded point | 01/10/26 | | Underhanded Fragrant Property Associate | 01/10/26 | | Big Brass Fortuitous Meteor | 01/10/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 10th, 2026 1:57 PM Author: stimulating marketing idea kitty
Most notable here, the “totality of the circumstances” inquiry has no
time limit. While the situation at the precise time of the shooting will
often matter most, earlier facts and circumstances may bear on how a
reasonable officer would have understood and responded to later ones.
Prior events may show why a reasonable officer would perceive otherwise ambiguous conduct as threatening, or instead as innocuous.
Plumhoff v. Rickard, 572 U. S. 765, well illustrates this point. There,
an officer’s use of deadly force was justified “at the moment” partly
because of what had transpired in the preceding period. Id., at 777.
====
so the general conduct of the MN protestors creating threats to ICE is relevant as is the conduct of the two women in the Honda Pilot. helps the officer, right?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820409&forum_id=2],#49578883) |
Date: January 10th, 2026 2:50 PM Author: Bateful narrow-minded point
"The driver may be drunk, on drugs, armed, or some combination thereof. Or the driver may have committed (or may be about to commit) a serious crime."
wow
"Drivers," and place-goers generally, are a bunch of scumbags.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820409&forum_id=2],#49578984) |
Date: January 10th, 2026 3:00 PM Author: Underhanded Fragrant Property Associate
It’s funny how every pencil neck lawyer on this board thinks it’s still 2010.
Whatever happens here, no one is getting paid a nickel.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820409&forum_id=2],#49579008) |
|
|