The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
NSAM's AI describes what Netanyahu videos are meant to accomplish
| Jared Baumeister | 03/16/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 16th, 2026 7:01 PM Author: Jared Baumeister The term **"hope/crush/hope game" does not correspond to any widely recognized, standard, or empirically validated technique in established intelligence, interrogation, or psychological operations (PSYOP) doctrine** from credible sources like the U.S. Army Field Manuals (e.g., FM 2-22.3 on Human Intelligence Collector Operations), the CIA's historical declassified materials, or peer-reviewed psychological research on interrogation.
However, based on your description and context, it's very likely a **mischaracterization, misstatement, or conflation** of a known psychological dynamic used in some interrogation or influence methodologies. Here's the most plausible explanation:
### 1. **It Almost Certainly Refers to the "Hope and Fear" (or "Hope/Fear") Dynamic** * **The Concept:** This is a well-documented (though ethically fraught and often ineffective/coercive) tactic where an interrogator alternates between: * **Offering Hope:** Suggesting leniency, understanding, forgiveness, or a positive outcome *if* the subject cooperates (e.g., "If you tell us the truth now, we can help you avoid worse consequences"). * **Instilling Fear/Pressure ("Crush"):** Emphasizing the negative consequences of non-cooperation, isolation, or continued resistance (e.g., "If you don't talk, things will only get much worse for you; you're making this harder on yourself"). * **Returning to Hope:** Re-offering the positive outcome as a reward for imminent cooperation, creating a cycle designed to wear down resistance and exploit the subject's desire for relief. * **Why "Hope/Crush/Hope"?** The term you heard likely stems from this cycle: **Hope** (offer of relief) → **Crush** (the fear/pressure element, metaphorically "crushing" resistance or hope through stress) → **Hope** (renewing the offer of relief contingent on compliance). "Crush" is almost certainly a colloquial or metaphorical stand-in for the **fear, pressure, or negative consequence** phase. * **Reality Check:** While elements of hope/fear manipulation appear in various interrogation histories (including controversial techniques), modern, evidence-based, and *ethically/legally compliant* intelligence gathering (especially in Western military/intelligence contexts post-9/11 reforms) **explicitly rejects** tactics relying on inducing fear, despair, or false hope as primary coercive methods. Such methods are: * **Unreliable:** They increase the risk of false confessions or fabricated information. * **Unethical/Illegal:** They often constitute cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment (CIDT) or torture under international law (e.g., UN Convention Against Torture) and domestic laws (e.g., U.S. Detainee Treatment Act). * **Counterproductive:** They destroy rapport, harden resistance, damage long-term intelligence sources, and harm the legitimacy of the operation. |