The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| Vibrant Cyan Gunner | 01/06/26 | | olive puppy | 01/06/26 | | Indigo offensive shrine | 01/06/26 | | olive puppy | 01/06/26 | | Indigo offensive shrine | 01/06/26 | | olive puppy | 01/06/26 | | Vibrant Cyan Gunner | 01/06/26 | | olive puppy | 01/06/26 | | Vibrant Cyan Gunner | 01/06/26 | | translucent vigorous jap toilet seat | 01/07/26 | | Mauve pea-brained house | 01/06/26 | | Insecure charcoal meetinghouse | 01/06/26 | | Indigo offensive shrine | 01/06/26 | | excitant bistre stage | 01/06/26 | | Indigo offensive shrine | 01/06/26 | | brindle parlour mexican | 01/06/26 | | Racy cobalt dingle berry | 01/06/26 | | cocky salmon black woman | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: olive puppy
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2],#49568134) |
|
|