The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| Primrose temple | 01/06/26 | | Galvanic bright home faggotry | 01/06/26 | | concupiscible genital piercing | 01/06/26 | | Galvanic bright home faggotry | 01/06/26 | | concupiscible genital piercing | 01/06/26 | | Galvanic bright home faggotry | 01/06/26 | | Primrose temple | 01/06/26 | | Galvanic bright home faggotry | 01/06/26 | | Primrose temple | 01/06/26 | | Drunken ocher candlestick maker mexican | 01/07/26 | | obsidian bawdyhouse internal respiration | 01/06/26 | | swashbuckling elite brunch friendly grandma | 01/06/26 | | concupiscible genital piercing | 01/06/26 | | razzle-dazzle people who are hurt roommate | 01/06/26 | | concupiscible genital piercing | 01/06/26 | | Olive Cracking House | 01/06/26 | | misunderstood mind-boggling trump supporter boltzmann | 01/06/26 | | sickened razzle filthpig | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: Galvanic bright home faggotry
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2],#49568134) |
|
|