The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| mind-boggling hot clown library | 01/06/26 | | Floppy salmon menage shitlib | 01/06/26 | | thriller misunderstood hospital weed whacker | 01/06/26 | | Floppy salmon menage shitlib | 01/06/26 | | thriller misunderstood hospital weed whacker | 01/06/26 | | Floppy salmon menage shitlib | 01/06/26 | | mind-boggling hot clown library | 01/06/26 | | Floppy salmon menage shitlib | 01/06/26 | | mind-boggling hot clown library | 01/06/26 | | Alcoholic Boistinker Den | 01/07/26 | | drab tanning salon | 01/06/26 | | Razzle Navy Parlor | 01/06/26 | | thriller misunderstood hospital weed whacker | 01/06/26 | | Hilarious double fault | 01/06/26 | | thriller misunderstood hospital weed whacker | 01/06/26 | | irradiated amethyst deer antler base | 01/06/26 | | Big gas station cuckoldry | 01/06/26 | | Shaky roast beef | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: Floppy salmon menage shitlib
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2],#49568134) |
|
|