Review of IBM's new open weight model by a bigtech bro
| citrine blood rage | 04/30/26 | | Flushed gaping prole | 04/30/26 | | Stirring rigpig mad-dog skullcap | 04/30/26 | | citrine blood rage | 04/30/26 | | Stirring rigpig mad-dog skullcap | 04/30/26 | | citrine blood rage | 04/30/26 | | Stirring rigpig mad-dog skullcap | 04/30/26 | | citrine blood rage | 04/30/26 | | Stirring rigpig mad-dog skullcap | 04/30/26 | | unhinged frozen state | 04/30/26 | | Stirring rigpig mad-dog skullcap | 04/30/26 | | unhinged frozen state | 04/30/26 | | Lilac stage | 04/30/26 | | flickering house international law enforcement agency | 04/30/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 30th, 2026 10:54 PM Author: citrine blood rage
I had a shortish exploratory chat with Granite4.1:8b tonight.
It is a good model. The outputs feel something akin to deterministic which reflects the enterprise deployment IBM is shooting for. Input -> Output. The voice is pleasant and not overly beepboop robot. It hyperfixates on patterns (one message with a list kicks off 5 more) but it responses really well to faux system messages correcting it. The world knowledge is good and nuanced for an 8b model.
If I had a no-human-in-the-loop pipeline for evaluations or content parsing or something I’d 100% reach for Granite 4.1 first. It’s like,,, instruct tuned but only enough to accomplish its intended goal.
——
Oh! And! No reasoning! As an engineered design constraint. Neat!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5862289&forum_id=2],#49856001) |
|
|