The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
scholarly bros: answer some conlaw questions (not ssm)
| haunting messiness | 06/19/13 |
| haunting messiness | 06/19/13 |
| exhilarant saffron office | 06/19/13 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 19th, 2013 7:16 PM Author: haunting messiness (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2286795&forum_id=2#23432253) |
Date: June 19th, 2013 8:07 PM Author: haunting messiness (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2286795&forum_id=2#23432572) |
|
Date: June 19th, 2013 8:16 PM Author: exhilarant saffron office i doubt it. and since the SCT isn't necessarily bound by precedent there could be the significant back and forth as to whether stare decisis should be honored, whether it should be altered, whether it should be overruled completely, etc.
it's all the same and i don't think anyone *really* knows the sort of stuff your asking |