My moderate take on feminism
| Taylor Swift is not a hobby she is a lifestyle | 03/20/26 | | logged in poaster | 03/20/26 | | Taylor Swift is not a hobby she is a lifestyle | 03/20/26 | | logged in poaster | 03/20/26 | | :-P | 03/20/26 | | Taylor Swift is not a hobby she is a lifestyle | 03/20/26 | | .,.,...,..,.,..:,,:,......,;:.,.:..:.,:,::,. | 03/20/26 | | :-P | 03/20/26 | | logged in poaster | 03/20/26 | | :-P | 03/20/26 | | logged in poaster | 03/20/26 | | :-P | 03/20/26 | | logged in poaster | 03/20/26 | | AZNgirl not letting AZNmen enter Website | 03/20/26 | | :-P | 03/20/26 | | Taylor Swift is not a hobby she is a lifestyle | 03/20/26 | | AZNgirl not letting AZNmen enter Website | 03/20/26 | | :-P | 03/20/26 | | Gavin Newsom | 03/20/26 | | legally female father | 03/20/26 | | Taylor Swift is not a hobby she is a lifestyle | 03/20/26 | | MASE | 03/20/26 | | Richard Ames | 03/20/26 | | logged in poaster | 03/20/26 | | :-P | 03/20/26 | | Taylor Swift is not a hobby she is a lifestyle | 03/20/26 | | logged in poaster | 03/20/26 | | Taylor Swift is not a hobby she is a lifestyle | 03/20/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: March 20th, 2026 11:46 AM Author: logged in poaster
feminism isn't a mono-causal issue
it's actually way worse than people think. 'feminism' is not just about women qua women. it's an anti-vitality, anti-life, anti-human disease that has enveloped all of modern human civilization
it's wrapped up in "liberal" enlightenment values and it can't be extricated from the baseline moral assumptions and beliefs that the modern world collectively holds
reversing it would require the complete dismantling of our society and its replacement with something totally foreign to modern human sensibilities
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5847862&forum_id=2#49757345) |
 |
Date: March 20th, 2026 11:53 AM
Author: .,.,...,..,.,..:,,:,......,;:.,.:..:.,:,::,.
A lot of traditional conservatives send their daughters off to liberal co-ed colleges, and encourage them to start a career and date multiple men to find "Mr. Right". Going to some SEC school and joining a sorority is a conservative coded lifestyle, but is actually extremely liberal. Getting back to keeping girls home and setting up soft arranged marriages between 18-20 years old is practically unthinkable even to most traditional conservatives.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5847862&forum_id=2#49757367) |
 |
Date: March 20th, 2026 12:01 PM Author: logged in poaster
"traditional conservative" values aren't a real thing. "conservatism" is a made-up cope 'concept' that people turn to in order to feel Superior to "insane" shitlibs (people who are taking enlightenment values to their legitimate and inevitable conclusion)
all of this - feminism and the rest of what i described above - is an inevitable consequence of enlightenment values. some would even argue that christianity alone put us on this trajectory, and that the enlightenment and its values were inevitable, too
i am not, at least not right now, advocating for a complete "roll-back" of enlightenment values. partly because it's impossible. "we" as the collective body of western civilization have already biologically evolved to an animal that's incompatible with pre-enlightenment values
there isn't actually a "solution" to all this. optimistically, there will be smaller pockets of westerners who will end up with pre-enlightenment values out of necessity due to selection, as modern society breaks down. those who maintain enlightenment values will not reproduce and/or they will be killed
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5847862&forum_id=2#49757385) |
 |
Date: March 20th, 2026 12:24 PM Author: logged in poaster
yeah, they were pretty "based" on women. just like you and i are pretty "based" on women today. but it doesn't matter. their fundamental moral beliefs and worldview, like ours, are in outright contradiction to these "based" beliefs on women that we hold
individual rights, freedom of expression, freedom of movement, free markets, "human rights" - all of these enlightenment values are incompatible with being "based" on women. they inevitably lead to 'feminism' and to the state of our society today
anyone or anything that tries to resist this trend has been and is out-competed. that's why it's "inevitable." but as the system collapses under the weight of foreigners who are incompatible with it, the selection pressures will eventually reverse, like i explained above
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5847862&forum_id=2#49757426) |
Date: March 20th, 2026 1:58 PM Author: Richard Ames
Feminism's rise was entirely predicated on a gigantic reduction in malthusian pressures. This was driven by the advent of cheap energy. We are slowly, but surely, exiting that era. As we do, feminism will be forced back in the closet.
When the economy can't support completely unnecessary industries and jobs that are entirely tied to consumer spending, women will go back to their natural roles.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5847862&forum_id=2#49757742) |
 |
Date: March 20th, 2026 2:22 PM Author: logged in poaster
Women in the workforce results in a net negative effect on economic production not net positive
Like I said above people's brains are so completely warped by modern society and the objectively extremely strange beliefs that it rests on that they literally cannot cognitively wrap their heads around this stuff
You can see how and why "talking about this stuff" never gets anywhere. People are not capable of "talking about it" because they don't even know what's going on
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5847862&forum_id=2#49757801) |
|
|