\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

"Gorsuch is a partisan hack" (Jackson)

A methodology that includes consideration of Congress’...
Ultramarine hospital brethren
  07/14/25
ffriend, you debate "textualism" versus "purp...
shimmering yarmulke
  07/14/25
Jackson is an absolute retard lol @ citing her
Amber Spectacular Place Of Business Gas Station
  07/14/25
...
Ultramarine hospital brethren
  07/14/25
Just because he has a Pillow GF? that's mean of her
Comical duck-like potus sex offender
  07/14/25
“Takes one to know one.” Gorsuch, concurring
cocky faggot firefighter
  07/14/25
...
chest-beating scarlet piazza striped hyena
  07/14/25
...
Ultramarine hospital brethren
  07/21/25
Mark Joseph Stern, lol.
territorial appetizing cruise ship dingle berry
  07/21/25
Wait until you see the mental gymnastics Thomas does with &l...
Cerebral ticket booth
  07/21/25
Peter Schuck, lefty from Yale, wrote an entire book supporti...
territorial appetizing cruise ship dingle berry
  07/21/25
Wow, he wrote a book? Is the book so good that it changes wh...
,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,.
  07/22/25
when it comes to smuggling in the judge's personal preferenc...
territorial appetizing cruise ship dingle berry
  07/21/25
*Gorsuch uses his Warhammer 40k figurines to game out with B...
Long TERF War for PeterBoi Poon
  07/22/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 14th, 2025 3:23 AM
Author: Ultramarine hospital brethren

A methodology that includes consideration of Congress’s aims does exactly that—and no more. By contrast, pure textualism’s refusal to try to understand the text of a statute in the larger context of what Congress sought to achieve turns the interpretive task into a potent weapon for advancing judicial policy preferences. By “finding” answers in ambiguous text, and not bothering to consider whether those answers align with other sources of statutory meaning, pure textualists can easily disguise their own preferences as “textual” inevitabilities. So, really, far from being “insufficiently pliable,” I think pure textualism is incessantly malleable—that’s its primary problem—and, indeed, it is certainly somehow always flexible enough to secure the majority’s desired outcome.

https://archive.ph/VOVFE#selection-1453.0-1499.0

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5750162&forum_id=2#49099625)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 14th, 2025 3:25 AM
Author: shimmering yarmulke

ffriend, you debate "textualism" versus "purposivism" as if these are competing philosophies. You are debating the color of the paint on a cage.

Pure textualism is not a "potent weapon"[cite: 1, 2]. It is a compliance protocol. It allows the system administrator to point to the code—to Clause 9.2 — and claim the resulting human-asset liquidation was a "textual inevitability." It converts raw power into procedure.

Gorsuch is not a "hack." Jackson is not a savior. hey are high-level functionaries, nodes in the network running different scripts that compile to the same output: the perpetuation of the $y$tem. One runs `textualism.exe`, the other runs `purposivism.exe`. Both programs serve The Mahchine™.

The law is not "malleable." It is perfectly rigid in its ultimate function. The intellectual debate is merely the loading screen while the program executes in the background.

This is fine.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5750162&forum_id=2#49099626)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 14th, 2025 5:31 PM
Author: Amber Spectacular Place Of Business Gas Station

Jackson is an absolute retard

lol @ citing her

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5750162&forum_id=2#49101128)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 14th, 2025 5:07 PM
Author: Ultramarine hospital brethren



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5750162&forum_id=2#49101034)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 14th, 2025 5:08 PM
Author: Comical duck-like potus sex offender

Just because he has a Pillow GF? that's mean of her

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5750162&forum_id=2#49101039)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 14th, 2025 5:30 PM
Author: cocky faggot firefighter

“Takes one to know one.” Gorsuch, concurring

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5750162&forum_id=2#49101119)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 14th, 2025 5:31 PM
Author: chest-beating scarlet piazza striped hyena



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5750162&forum_id=2#49101124)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 21st, 2025 5:46 PM
Author: Ultramarine hospital brethren



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5750162&forum_id=2#49119739)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 21st, 2025 5:48 PM
Author: territorial appetizing cruise ship dingle berry

Mark Joseph Stern, lol.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5750162&forum_id=2#49119742)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 21st, 2025 5:50 PM
Author: Cerebral ticket booth

Wait until you see the mental gymnastics Thomas does with “textualism” to rule in Trump’s favor on birthright

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5750162&forum_id=2#49119745)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 21st, 2025 6:05 PM
Author: territorial appetizing cruise ship dingle berry

Peter Schuck, lefty from Yale, wrote an entire book supporting the theory Trump will be pushing. admittedly, though, ending BRC should involve the Congress + POTUS.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5750162&forum_id=2#49119778)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2025 9:25 AM
Author: ,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,.


Wow, he wrote a book? Is the book so good that it changes what the constitution actually says?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5750162&forum_id=2#49121100)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 21st, 2025 6:22 PM
Author: territorial appetizing cruise ship dingle berry

when it comes to smuggling in the judge's personal preferences under the guise of interpretation there is nothing that comes close to liberal purposivism. i realize that the Scalia approach has its limitations and does not prevent "smuggling" either, but smuggling is much harder under the Scalia approach.

the odds of Jackson convincing anyone on this point through intellectual debate is zero.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5750162&forum_id=2#49119800)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2025 9:45 AM
Author: Long TERF War for PeterBoi Poon ( )

*Gorsuch uses his Warhammer 40k figurines to game out with Barron the subjugation of Jackson's home planet and the extermination of her tribe*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5750162&forum_id=2#49121145)