The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Bort olds is this what the Clinton sex scandal was like?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 12th, 2025 1:57 PM Author: awkward heaven (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2#49423464) |
Date: November 12th, 2025 2:17 PM Author: aphrodisiac tripping spot queen of the night It was a combination of non-stop hilarious late night fodder that this Boomer was pounding teen cunnus, and a lot of sanctimonious outrage in DC because he was corrupting the morals of a generation. But the man basically was the early Trump, deny deny deny then get away with it by sheer charisma. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2#49423521) |
 |
Date: November 12th, 2025 2:30 PM Author: awkward heaven I guess one difference is Clinton’s approval was in the 60s/70s when all that was going on while Trump’s is in the 30s (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2#49423563) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 1:21 PM Author: Juan Eighty (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2#49443971) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 1:57 PM Author: stfu jewbag how come he never got 50% of the popular vote then? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2#49444055) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 2:00 PM Author: Nothing Ever Happens (🧐) Are you saying the approval ratings were just made up? What's your actual point?
Almost like there was an third party candidate who got a fair number of votes in both of his elections |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:23 PM Author: stfu jewbag almost like 50% of voters voted against Bill Clinton. Why does it matter if it’s for ghwb or some nerd billionaire fag? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2#49445176) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:35 PM Author: Nothing Ever Happens (🧐) again, what is your actual point? do you think the approval ratings were made up? does having <50% of the popular vote change the fact that he was objectively a popular president by the end of his term? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2#49445192) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:39 PM Author: stfu jewbag if he was so popular than more people should have voted for him. votes matter more than "approval ratings".
not sure wtf your point with the Perot comment is other than that Clinton, being as unpopular as he was, would probably not have won in 1992 if not for him. |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:40 PM Author: Nothing Ever Happens (🧐) you are fucking retarded and should go back to twitter where you came from
"if he's so popular why didnt more people vote for him" "because his popularity increased over time" "but then why didnt they vote for him" |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:43 PM Author: stfu jewbag it's a simple question. why did half of the US electorate vote against Bill Clinton if he's as "popular" as you say he was and so many people "approved" of him? he couldn't even crack 50% running against Bob fucking Dole. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2#49445206) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:45 PM Author: Nothing Ever Happens (🧐) repeating the same question over and over instead of addressing actual arguments is for twitterfags. go back to your circlejerk (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2#49445211) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 2:03 PM Author: .....;;,,.........;.;.;.;.,;,;,;.;.;,; Please state your awareness of Ross Perot’s campaigns for POTUS in 92 and 96 before I engage you further. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2#49444068) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:22 PM Author: stfu jewbag How does that change the fact that 50%+ of the voters voted against Bill Clinton. If he was so popular then you would think they would vote for him (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2#49445171) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 2:15 PM Author: .,.,.....,.,.;,.,,,:,.,.,::,..,.:,..;,.. because he ran against legit 3rd party candidate both times who got a double digit percentage of the vote. Trump never had to run against a Perot, and still never won a majority of the vote (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2#49444093) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:20 PM Author: stfu jewbag that doesn’t change the fact that >50% of the voters voted against Clinton (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2#49445169) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 1:13 PM Author: gay porn faggottt (gunneratttt) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2#49443937) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 1:14 PM Author: ;::;:;;::;;;;;:::: the late night jokes were 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2#49443940) |
|
Date: November 12th, 2025 2:18 PM Author: motley jet-lagged house i remember when the starr report came out, i looked through it for the most salacious bits. searched pdf for cigar (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2#49423525) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 10:04 AM Author: .,.,.....,.,.;,.,,,:,.,.,::,..,.:,..;,.. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2#49443505) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 1:11 PM Author: ;::;:;;::;;;;;:::: no, other than the move on freaks, the democrats didn't try and make excuses for Clinton's sleaziness and openly acknowledged he was an inveterate pussy hound. They in fact leaned into his scumbag nature. I still remember listening to Rush, broadcasting live from the impeachment proceedings. |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 1:18 PM Author: Nothing Ever Happens (🧐) I still remember seeing this as a kid https://i.etsystatic.com/26238862/r/il/e28720/7041226981/il_794xN.7041226981_o62c.jpg (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2#49443961) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 1:32 PM Author: fulano what was awful about this period was how relentless this was. non stop media stories about this, every newspaper, broadcast, magazine. no XO! something like 85% of america reported major fatigue on this shit but it was salacious enough to keep selling. |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:45 PM Author: stfu jewbag lol he was literally getting blown by 21 year old interns in the oval office and jamming cigars up their twats (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2#49445212) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 1:51 PM Author: Nazca Redlines It felt like it received more sustained coverage and was a treated as a bigger deal and bigger scandal. That's in large part because there was still a lot of faith and pride in the office of the presidency, so a scandalous affair in the oval office was particularly saliacious and disorienting. Could this even be real? How could he? Now, society is divided, people no longer respect our institutions, and a sex trafficking scandal involving at lest two presidents is not only unsurprising, it's expected. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2#49444046) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:36 PM Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, if you need to, read the definitive account:
https://www.amazon.com/Death-American-Virtue-Clinton-Starr/dp/0307409457
Starr was a decent man but when the details of the Arkansas land deals got confusing Starr kept expanding the inquiry into all sorts of nonsense. yes, Bill committed perjury and yes Bill sexually assaulted women in ways that Trump never did, but the utter lack of judgment by Starr and his team lead to the death of the Special Prosecutor. |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:38 PM Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, also, Bill lied under oath. no one doubts that. ask yourself what would happen if Trump lied under oath that way. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2#49445198) |