The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Lmao, Wray resigns day before IG Report reveals >26 FBI agents breached Capitol
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 12th, 2024 3:18 PM Author: Blue Library https://x.com/leadingreport/status/1867297057070882998?s=61 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5648530&forum_id=2#48441556) |
Date: December 12th, 2024 3:28 PM Author: Angry Hall Sandwich ok, let's back up. Trump and his people were telling everyone in the government in advance to get the National Guard up there, etc.
Pelosi and libs wanted to see something they could claim was an insurrection. so they pulled protection.
the FBI should have been all over this in terms of preventing anyone from entering the Capitol. but the FBI's leadership is compromised.
the FBI should have had plainclothes people within the crowd. it's their fucking job. had they not had embedded personnel it would have been a failure. but the FBI's biggest failure, by far, was that they and the libs could have, should have, done what Trump's people asked and prevented the J6 incident. |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2024 3:40 PM Author: awkward lime persian hell It's not their job. Capitol Police are part of the Legislative Branch and don't answer to DOJ or the FBI. If anything the FBI did them a favor by having informants in the crowd. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5648530&forum_id=2#48441654) |
|
Date: December 12th, 2024 3:40 PM Author: Stirring house patrolman Link to Trump telling everyone else we needed the national guard to protest against the mobs he ordered to come to the Capitol and make trouble? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5648530&forum_id=2#48441655) |
|
Date: December 12th, 2024 3:57 PM Author: Angry Hall Sandwich "we needed the national guard to protest against the mobs"
can you rephrase, please, counsel? |
|
Date: December 12th, 2024 3:33 PM Author: irate abode pozpig PER NPR - no "undercover employees"
No undercover employees The report also found no evidence that the FBI had undercover employees in the protest crowds or at the Capitol on Jan. 6, although the watchdog determined that 26 FBI informants were in D.C. on the day. The report said three of the informants were tasked by the FBI with traveling to Washington specifically to report on domestic terrorism subjects who might be attending the event.
None of the informants, the report said, were authorized to enter the Capitol or a restricted area, or to break the law. However, the inspector general's review found that four of them did enter the Capitol on Jan. 6, and an additional 13 entered the restricted area around the Capitol. None of them have faced charges, the report says. |
|
Date: December 12th, 2024 3:39 PM Author: Bateful senate *Ray Epps beady eyes narrow* (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5648530&forum_id=2#48441651) |
|
Date: December 12th, 2024 3:56 PM Author: Angry Hall Sandwich No undercover "employees"
so no W2s. just 1099s.
|
|
Date: December 12th, 2024 4:19 PM Author: Sienna Mental Disorder "None of the informants, the report said, were authorized to enter the Capitol or a restricted area, or to break the law." look, we said to go there, gather information, observe, act like you belong, but did we ever say to do x, y, or z???!!!. no, we did not |
|
Date: December 12th, 2024 4:23 PM Author: awkward lime persian hell (sealclubber) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5648530&forum_id=2#48441910) |
|
Date: December 12th, 2024 3:39 PM Author: awkward lime persian hell What's wrong with this? It doesn't say any actual agents were there. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5648530&forum_id=2#48441647) |
|
Date: December 12th, 2024 3:41 PM Author: Stirring house patrolman It’s utterly humiliating for cons and they’re trying to spin it as a victory as always (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5648530&forum_id=2#48441657) |
|
Date: December 12th, 2024 3:42 PM Author: awkward lime persian hell Cons don't seem to know much about how these cases were actually prosecuted, or who got hit with serious sentences, or why, or based on what evidence. Libs aren't super spun up on this either, but they generally know more about the actual facts than cons. Always been that way. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5648530&forum_id=2#48441660) |
|
Date: December 12th, 2024 3:58 PM Author: Angry Hall Sandwich again, they SHOULD have had agents there. it's their fucking job.
and of course they and 5-6 layers of government should have heeded Trump's call for NG, etc. |
|
Date: December 12th, 2024 4:16 PM Author: awkward lime persian hell It's not at all their job to have agents there. They are part of the EXECUTIVE BRANCH, and Congress already has its own police (including undercover agents) who don't answer to the DOJ Inspector General. The last thing Congress wants (or needs) is the FBI up in its grill.
This used to be a law board. |