Shitlawyer uses AI for closing arg, becomes subject of ineffective assistance
| Pink metal friendly grandma party of the first part | 11/20/25 | | Bistre arousing hissy fit | 11/20/25 | | opaque orchestra pit mexican | 11/20/25 | | Pink metal friendly grandma party of the first part | 11/20/25 | | Narrow-minded odious field newt | 11/20/25 | | Pink metal friendly grandma party of the first part | 11/20/25 | | razzle university cuckoldry | 11/20/25 | | razzmatazz pistol lay | 11/21/25 | | Bronze lodge | 11/20/25 | | razzle university cuckoldry | 11/20/25 | | .,.,.,.,.,.,..,.,.,,.,.,..,>,... | 11/22/25 | | razzle university cuckoldry | 11/20/25 | | hyperventilating kitchen gay wizard | 11/21/25 | | (she was a bowl of yams) | 11/22/25 | | thanksgivings | 11/22/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: November 22nd, 2025 9:04 AM
Author: .,.,.,.,.,.,..,.,.,,.,.,..,>,... ( )
This is actually a legit thing among defbros. They're willing to "play along" and not defend themselves too hard against an Ineffective Assistance claim because it's no harm to them but gives their client another chance to freeroll against the gov. Part of our crime problem is how absurdly the deck is stacked in favor of criminals. An acquittal is an acquittal, but there's always a way to argue for a retrial if it's a guilty verdict.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800540&forum_id=2#49451511) |
|
|