The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Hypo: Kick five U.S. states out of the Union BUT give them nukes
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 25th, 2013 8:46 PM Author: Exhilarant brindle cumskin dilemma You can expel five American states from the Union. The U.S. will no longer collect taxes from them, nor will it send welfare payments. The newly independent states will also be guaranteed membership in the U.N., if desired, or the option to join another country.
In exchange, the U.S. will leave 100 nuclear missiles, 50 nuclear-armed aircraft, and 5 nuclear submarines.
Pick five. |
 |
Date: May 25th, 2013 10:39 PM Author: Bisexual ruddy gay wizard Do we even have 25 nuclear subs? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23270395) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 10:57 PM Author: Exhilarant brindle cumskin dilemma We have 42 Los Angeles class active subs alone. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23270534) |
Date: May 25th, 2013 10:38 PM Author: Exhilarant brindle cumskin dilemma (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23270388) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 10:39 PM Author: geriatric factory reset button California, OFS (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23270397) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 10:40 PM Author: mildly autistic angry locale what's the point of giving them nukes? to defend from foreign invaders? to give them some sort of status in the world as a powerful country? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23270407) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 11:01 PM Author: Exhilarant brindle cumskin dilemma Defend them from foreigners, sure. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23270581) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 10:41 PM Author: rusted buck-toothed corn cake lol we would nuke you blue state fucks so fast you wouldnt know what hit you (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23270412) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 10:41 PM Author: Bisexual ruddy gay wizard Washington, Oregon, California, Nevada, Arizona (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23270417) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 10:42 PM Author: mildly autistic angry locale brb mexico just became a superpower (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23270427) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 10:45 PM Author: rusted buck-toothed corn cake rationale?? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23270447) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 10:48 PM Author: Bisexual ruddy gay wizard Controlling the Pacific, technology, and some mountains would be nice. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23270467) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 10:47 PM Author: adulterous office death wish Congrats, the Rocky Mountains now becomes the newly established DMZ. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23270461) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 10:48 PM Author: irate set prole You'd give away the entire Pacific? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23270468) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 10:49 PM Author: Bisexual ruddy gay wizard I would live in the new country.
More like I'd take away the Pacific. |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 11:04 PM Author: Exhilarant brindle cumskin dilemma LOL, good luck without a Navy. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23270603) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 10:53 PM Author: Bisexual ruddy gay wizard I'm not sure Nevada is worth it. It might be better to trade Nevada for Hawaii. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23270510) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 11:04 PM Author: Exhilarant brindle cumskin dilemma Hawaii's deadweight. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23270609) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 10:46 PM Author: jet station faggot firefighter the concession doesn't make sense (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23270453) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 10:48 PM Author: adulterous office death wish Not at all.
Why the fuck would we give MOAR nations Nukes.
Especially when they are IN THE SAME FUCKING CONTINENT! |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 11:03 PM Author: Exhilarant brindle cumskin dilemma Yeah, no continent can survive with multiple nuclear-armed nations. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23270597) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 10:58 PM Author: motley drab dysfunction useless brakes NY, CA, IL, PA, MA (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23270545) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 11:02 PM Author: ivory bipolar hell What are the 5 most worthless states in the Union? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23270595) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 11:07 PM Author: motley drab dysfunction useless brakes the states with the most shitlibs (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23270631) |
|
Date: May 26th, 2013 1:12 AM Author: rusted buck-toothed corn cake (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23271319) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 11:08 PM Author: Exhilarant brindle cumskin dilemma 1. Hawaii 2. Florida 3. Maine 4. Washington 5. Oregon |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 11:10 PM Author: ivory bipolar hell Hawaii is a good buffer, though, if we ever got into a military conflict with an Asian power, bro. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23270653) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 11:12 PM Author: Exhilarant brindle cumskin dilemma No, it isn't. A better buffer would be sending aid to the Filipinos or establishing a joint command at Guam. This isn't 1940. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23270662) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 11:03 PM Author: pink pistol all the blue states with 20+ electoral votes (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23270600) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 11:09 PM Author: Exhilarant brindle cumskin dilemma *expels states*
*gives them nukes*
*shitlibs refuse nukes*
*are invaded by russia, raped, killed*
*everybody wins* |
|
Date: May 26th, 2013 1:13 AM Author: rusted buck-toothed corn cake (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23271325) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 11:10 PM Author: spectacular canary incel corner Well the concession makes this Hypo stupid, but I'd give away Michigan, Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota and Wisconsin. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23270656) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 11:13 PM Author: Exhilarant brindle cumskin dilemma No, the concession makes this hypo a little more complex than NAME FIVE FAGGOT STATES, which even a mouthbreather like you could do (though not successfully). (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23270668) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 11:19 PM Author: spectacular canary incel corner (MAF Reptile) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2265735&forum_id=2#23270701) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2013 11:25 PM Author: Soul-stirring brethren I would kick out Texas-Oklahoma-Louisiana-North Dakota-Alaska, then move to this glorious new reptile nuclear petro-nation.
You would have the lions share of US offshore O&G exploration, energy capital in Houston, tons of natural gas infrastructure in Oklahoma/Cushing, significant new developments in North Dakota, as well as the Alaskan oil and a location for a pacific military port to station nuclear weapons. North Dakota would be somewhat isolated, but with so many nuclear weapons and a new USA that's extremely blue Petromerica should be fine. Should be lots of oil related trade through Alaska-Canada-North Dakota. Petromerica could also threaten the new US with an oil embargo if they refuse to allow construction of a Keynstone pipeline from Canada to Houston.
part of me is sad that this won't happen, it'd be incredible |
|
Date: May 26th, 2013 1:02 AM Author: medicated bright meetinghouse purely for purposes of a strong america and weak other states that form this/these new country/countries
Hawaii Maine VT NH Wyoming
|