The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Do you believe the government is hiding a CURE FOR CANCER? Yes or no
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 21st, 2025 9:24 AM Author: dark research boner (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5713913&forum_id=2#48866361) |
Date: April 21st, 2025 9:31 AM Author: ,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,. if there was cure it would be developed by Pfizer or someone, not the federal govt (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5713913&forum_id=2#48866376) |
 |
Date: April 21st, 2025 9:35 AM Author: fluid and in that case it most definitely would be hidden, because their whole model is based on "subscription for life" not cure (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5713913&forum_id=2#48866392) |
|
Date: April 21st, 2025 12:33 PM Author: .,..,.,.;,.,,:,.,.,::,...,..,:,..;,.., You have the absolute worst takes on literally every topic to the point that you may actually be a mentally retarded ccp stooge vs Jewish. Either way you clearly are a pedophile. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5713913&forum_id=2#48866930) |
|
Date: April 21st, 2025 9:36 AM Author: novus homo (gunneratttt) yeah. the government is hyper competent and totally capable of this. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5713913&forum_id=2#48866396) |
|
Date: April 21st, 2025 9:41 AM Author: fluid there aren't government funded and government adjacent research groups that are far ahead in research because they don't have to wait for ape consensus in "journals"? its not about a one monolithic govt being "competent", its about what our trillions of dollars in budget could possibly be funding, and when the money spigot turns on and its not enervated by "grant apps" and debates about public optics, the high iq primates do things. To think otherwise is to misunderstand how power works. Do you really think they are giving away our most advanced and dangerous knowledge to undergrads on jstor? It doesn't necessarily have to be a one hidden cure for cancer, but there can be the tech, math and experimental evidence to do something close to it, and projects for this "stall" or are "repurposed" to something less disruptive and more lucrative. Your stuck in the "malevolent puppeteer running a conspiracy" mindset, when there are much more plausible explanations for how stuff like this happens (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5713913&forum_id=2#48866410) |
|
Date: April 21st, 2025 9:45 AM Author: novus homo (gunneratttt) you're right it's amazing people don't notice all the MD/PhDs the government poaches from top programs that disappear into secret government research facilities and are never heard from again. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5713913&forum_id=2#48866420) |
|
Date: April 21st, 2025 9:50 AM Author: fluid Yeah you're right because people definitely don't sign NDAs, and people don't get tribaly and ritually inducted into environments where they know if they say anything stupid publicly they will be ruined and humiliated forever and there aren't tons of examples of this already happening. Was there not some daft whistleblower at google in 2017 that leaked machines waking up way before it happened and was cast off like a heretic? Were people not gaslit for a century straight about UAP existing until govt just admitted it recently and chimps are still so brainwashed they are afraid to talk about it out loud? Was there not just an airborne toxic event level "COVID" event where dumb apes were mass ritually lulled into thinking a virus came from a wetmarket when the bioweapons lab was right across the street? Pretty sure if that last one can happen, then a small group of researchers working on classified projects isn't auto going to leak just because apes can talk. They can speak all they want, but how far does their speech travel and who believes it and at what point are they silenced? You realize there ARE people who work on this stuff and just don't make a big deal about it and its normal to them right? There are literally old money families where everyone in their circle knows that "insert X impossible tech" is just some stuff dad works on, and classified research has been in the family for a century. You underestimate how well forbidden topics are foreclosed and redditor mentality keeps them from being believed when they slip. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5713913&forum_id=2#48866439) |
|
Date: April 21st, 2025 10:31 AM Author: novus homo (gunneratttt) so there is forbidden future tech that old money circles speak freely about? which you believe because some guy once said the equivalent of "my dad worked at nintendo"?
this is retarded conspiracy babble. the fact that the origins of an airborne toxic event could not be covered up forever because of independent scientists and research is not a particularly strong argument for "the government has a cure of cancer but keeps it secret." |
|
Date: April 21st, 2025 11:35 AM Author: fluid are you serious or are you just cosplaying as a reddit midwit? you actually think that government classified projects and government semi-classified adjacent projects including those at google and apple and open ai and other places dont have tech and knowledge that isn't available to the public? What are you some kind of wide-eyed 22 year old phd applicant that thinks all knowledge is locked behind a vault and debated by people with tenure? you have no idea how real power works if you are for real right now.
You using "government has a cure for cancer" is just a strawman now for the obvious truths you are denying in every other part of the discussion. There doesn't have to be a "one syringe that gets rid of this malady" panacea in existence for the essence of the claim to be true. I'm saying we have the math, physics, chemistry, bio to cure just about anything, that that knowledge is not available to the public and is suppressed by -- literally, by reddit midwit skeptical culture and "debunkers" -- and that the cures don't happen because projects that veer toward that territory get quietly redirected or derailed or sandboxed due to their disruptive nature and due to power balance and wealth interests.
Your argument amounts to "I have never seen this stuff before or encountered it so it must not exist". Nah, sorry to break it to you but it does. The fact that you deny it when we live in a time where the govt literally came out and said "UAP are real", and people barely reacted should be proof enough. People are brainwashed to the extent they can sit up there with a PSA megaphone and shout about suppressed knowledge, and people are too fatigured and braindead to react, no matter how disruptive the knowledge is. |
|
Date: April 21st, 2025 11:58 AM Author: novus homo (gunneratttt) that you think classified technology existing is a meaningful point or that i'm denying classified technology exists is stupid. and i'm not "strawmaning" anything addressing "does the government have a secret cure for cancer", that is literally the topic of the thread.
classified technology is classified for security and intelligence reasons. there are a bunch of organizations both inside and outside the united states that do cancer research. it is unthinkable that the government could develop a cure for cancer without the scientific community becoming aware. this would be a massive undertaking and require the government poaching a bunch of cancer scientists who are totally chill with developing a cure and keeping it secret. it would require no other organization discovering the cure too, despite the obvious profit motives they have. it would require the government undertaking this massive project only to keep it classified for some conspiratorial reason. and it would require every single researcher and administrator never spilling the beans, and for some reason taking the secret to the grave even though many will be personally affected by cancer.
this is stupid and not worthy of engagement. and repeating "you know the government does develop classified tech!?" doesn't persuade me to engage you because repeating something so obvious as if it's meaningful just demonstrates how unserious and retarded you are. |
|
Date: April 21st, 2025 9:46 AM Author: ,.,.,.,........,....,,,.. No. The idea of a single cure for all types of cancer is far fetched. They’re all very different (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5713913&forum_id=2#48866425) |
|
Date: April 21st, 2025 9:47 AM Author: Oh, you tirade? Far more likely that they're actively hiding known, proven direct causes of cancer, whether it be the drywall and paint in our houses, the plastic we wear and eat, or the fluoride in our water. Or all of them tbf. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5713913&forum_id=2#48866432) |
|
Date: April 21st, 2025 11:37 AM Author: Dunedain cowboy (πΎπ£) It's both (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5713913&forum_id=2#48866797) |
|
Date: April 21st, 2025 12:43 PM Author: Faggottini The #1 thing i have heard on this point is prevalence of asbestos in concrete/cement (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5713913&forum_id=2#48866981) |
|
Date: April 21st, 2025 11:45 AM Author: Miss Anthropy CRISPR is currently trying to figure out how to profit from their cure. They're doing trial studies atm, and expect to roll out their cure in 2043. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5713913&forum_id=2#48866809) |