The leaders of this new movement are replacing traditional liberal beliefs about tolerance, free inquiry, and even racial harmony with ideas so toxic and unattractive that they eschew debate, moving straight to shaming, threats, and intimidation. They are counting on the guilt-ridden, self-flagellating nature of traditional American progressives, who will not stand up for themselves, and will walk to the Razor voluntarily.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4559275&forum_id=2#40407092)

They will still be gurgling to themselves about how they are "real liberals" as their necks snap hanging from the gallows

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4559275&forum_id=2#40407115)

Beyond that, a sampling:

"The leaders of this new movement are replacing traditional liberal beliefs about tolerance, free inquiry, and even racial harmony with ideas so toxic and unattractive "

"They are counting on the guilt-ridden, self-flagellating nature of traditional American progressives"

"They’ve conned organization after organization into empowering panels to search out thoughtcrime"

Beyond that, how low is your IQ? "Some of what he said was fact-based, so therefore it's not an opinion piece. Now I'm going to no-true-scotsman his assertions based on 'saliency'"

lmfao xo 2020

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4559275&forum_id=2#40412736)

Apparently xo is just as stupid as commenters at substack.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4559275&forum_id=2#40412769)

It's the fact that he works for Rolling Stone and not the NYT that he can write exactly what he thinks.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4559275&forum_id=2#40409031)

good god. go to hell libs.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4559275&forum_id=2#40408174)

The real question is whether, given a higher % of minorities in the USA and (more importantly) a higher % of absolutely insane whites, it will happen again.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4559275&forum_id=2#40409650)

they have patiently built their goy army of programmed zombie lib militants interspersed with key Jews. It is now big and very dangerous. For the Jewish Monolith(they never ever disagree, except superficially and temporarily) it is now 1917 once again

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4559275&forum_id=2#40408298)

you need knowledge and insight

and try arguing instead

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4559275&forum_id=2#40408317)

Reply Favorite

Date: June 13th, 2020 11:19 AM

Author: inside

you're an actual insane person, and no i'm not jewish

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4559275&forum_id=2#40408962)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4559275&forum_id=2#40409046)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4559275&forum_id=2#40411698)

I don’t know why this particular bit stood out as both infuriating and funny. I am sure someone at CNN asked this woman what the fuck she was on about, right?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4559275&forum_id=2#40408520)

Like one of Michael Tracey's responses to the criticism was "b-b-but I marched for gay marriage!" OK but in 2020 gay marriage is the status quo. If you're pro gay marriage, you're a conservative. That wasn't true in 2002 but it is now.

If you think gay marriage is fake you're no longer a conservative. You're a reactionary.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4559275&forum_id=2#40409598)

Second, guys like taibbi have plenty of things they wouldn't want to 'conserve' in american politics, particularly the surveillance state, america's foreign policy orthodoxy, corporate power, banking deregulation, etc. seems inaccurate to paint him as a 'conservative' just because cancel culture is high profile these days and he would want to "conserve" the old leftist idea of open dialogue, while at the same time pressing for massive changes in other significant political areas.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4559275&forum_id=2#40412160)

actually that's exactly what I'd say. The definition of liberal is the desire to maximize individual autonomy. There's a reason they're called *liber*tarians. Modern political discourse misuses the words conservative/liberal/progressive in a way that's incoherent and unhelpful. The dictionary definitions are better.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4559275&forum_id=2#40416471)

candidate for most BEEP BEEP BEEP comment of 2020

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4559275&forum_id=2#40412781)

It's amazing how many on the left fail to have a remotely accurate picture of what "typical" on each side looks like (as far as generalization can be made), or the basic characteristics and correlates - that eg income is correlated with propensity to vote R even *within* blue states, and so on.

It's okay to mock poor stupid republicans because they're white, while the left's "deplorables" are completely off limits culturally. The left dominates the lowest income brackets - yet your typical lib thinks Republican means farmer while Democrat means urban elite academic. Nevermind eg voters making over 100k are a majority Republican demographic even in CA / NY / MA etc. Republicans have a major branding problem - instead of MC / UMC white family in the suburbs they're branded as redneck farmer idiots voting against their own interests - it never ceases to amaze me how many IRL libs I talk to who buy this bs.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4559275&forum_id=2#40412418)

(2) These white guy "liberals" will still spend 95% of their time worrying about and hating Trump, and then they wonder why this stuff keeps happening.

(3) Apologizing doesn't work.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4559275&forum_id=2#40408782)

(((They))) are the root problem, and you know it deep down

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4559275&forum_id=2#40408952)

There is symbolism here that goes beyond frustration with police or even with racism: these are orgiastic, quasi-religious, and most of all, deeply weird scenes, and the press is too paralyzed to wonder at it. In a business where the first job requirement was once the willingness to ask tough questions, we’ve become afraid to ask obvious ones.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4559275&forum_id=2#40408930)

Shit will eventually get bad enough that conservative positions become the mainstream. Then conservatives will overplay their hand and the libs will become ascendent again. It's been this way for 500 years.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4559275&forum_id=2#40409050)

one would also think Taibbi might need to declare his past history with Omidyar-run companies before taking shots at The Intercept (literally, retards scuffling) but none of that matters to him

he sits around postulating about how smart he is because he lived in Russia for a while.

as his career has borne out, when you lob shit at all sides, you end up a no friends loser. wtf is "taibbi.substack.com"? was wordpress too expensive?

also LOL at calling this "reporting"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4559275&forum_id=2#40412182)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4559275&forum_id=2#40412217)

Unfortunately for this guy he's a white male, so byebye.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4559275&forum_id=2#40412332)