The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
scholarly bros: answer some conlaw questions (not ssm)
| Titillating Unholy Telephone Meetinghouse | 06/19/13 |
| Titillating Unholy Telephone Meetinghouse | 06/19/13 |
| Pearly razzmatazz dragon | 06/19/13 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 19th, 2013 7:16 PM Author: Titillating Unholy Telephone Meetinghouse (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2286795&forum_id=2#23432253) |
Date: June 19th, 2013 8:07 PM Author: Titillating Unholy Telephone Meetinghouse (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2286795&forum_id=2#23432572) |
|
Date: June 19th, 2013 8:16 PM Author: Pearly razzmatazz dragon i doubt it. and since the SCT isn't necessarily bound by precedent there could be the significant back and forth as to whether stare decisis should be honored, whether it should be altered, whether it should be overruled completely, etc.
it's all the same and i don't think anyone *really* knows the sort of stuff your asking |