Oops! Millions of years of evolution didn't turn out that way. Yeah, some chicks will be characters for whatever reason. Some will *think* they're characters when actually they're dull, unfunny, and unoriginal.

The reason men have personality as she describes is because without it men DO NOT EXIST and are COMPLETELY INVISIBLE. Men who fail to pass on their genes go extinct. Everyone is descended from a long line of men who were good at something (hunting, fishing, amassing wealth via financial Jewery, SOMETHING!). Women don't have to be good at anything to reproduce they just have to have a nice body and lie there like a starfish.

What bjork is espousing here is the same feminized cultural nonsense that produced the Charlie's Angels reboot flop where a bunch of otherwise hot chicks look as dikey and unfuckable as possible while complaining about men being wrong. That's the alternative, folks.

Women can have personalities... they just also have to be women. Period. And it's a total luxury to be hot and desired enough to say, wouldn't it be cool if I could gain 100 lbs and cursed like a sailor. Hey guess who never actually followed through on her plan to be judged solely by her personality? Bjork. Still thin, pretty, and white! Still using her beauty to sell records, I see!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5413569&forum_id=2#48174481)

because she presents herself in a traditionally feminine way she clearly doesn't see anything wrong with embracing that. all she's saying is that women are individuals and shouldn't be judged, either positively or negatively, on their identity as women.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5413569&forum_id=2#48174569)

acknowledging that women are individuals is not the same as rejecting traditional femininity completely. that's basically the opposite side of the same coin as 3rd wave feminism. the schism between traditional and modern feminism is whether it's good or even acceptable for women to feminine. a modern feminist will accuse a woman who wants to be a SAHM a traitor to their gender in the same way you accuse anyone that doesn't completely embrace their traditional role as women as being a gender traitor.

because bjork embraces her beauty and incorporates that into her performance she obviously doesn't complete reject femininity. and she also rejects the modern feminist movement here by saying that women should not be treated specially because they are women.

i find that HEROIC women like bjork, rowling, jcm, fizzkid, gtttr, etc. tend to embrace their femininity and reject the idea that it's *bad* that women behave like women. they neither want to be forced to pretend that men and women are identical nor be forced to completely conform to a gender role. i notice that ARE heroic fempoasters neither run from their femininity nor try to be defined by it by getting acclaim through shit like thirst traps. i suspect are fempoasters tend to enjoy xo because they can participate in banter and their thoughts through faceless anonymity it a way that can be difficult to find irl.

your poast is primarily about how seeking to completely escape gender roles is impossible and stupid, but you also are saying people should reject the idea that they are anything but their gender role. that seems equally impossible and stupid to me. everyone wants to be viewed as an individual -- men and women. that doesn't mean that they reject gender roles completely. in fact, people like bjork and are fempoasters tend to embrace and enjoy being women. but acknowledging that they enjoy being appreciated for beauty, caretaking, emotional intelligence etc. in a way that men aren't isn't the same as accepting a role as a thoughtless tradwife. likewise, i think most men enjoy being masculine and like to be appreciated for their physical strength and ability to provide, they also don't want to be defined solely by their height and net worth.

being dishonest about gender and their motivations is what shitlibs do. i don't see any of that in the bjork vid. you are saying any desire to be seen as anything but your gender role is stupid and destructive, which seems equally as naive as "there is no difference between men and women" types. you certainly don't, otherwise you wouldn't be doing something faggy like poasting your thoughts online. you'd spend 100% of your time on stuff like exercising and making money. poasting certainly isn't conducive to being attractive to women and increasing your odds of successfully procreating, so why do you engage in it, other than express your thoughts as an individual and read those of others?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5413569&forum_id=2#48174860)

STRIVING is what advances humanity in positive ways. Working until you die is essential and starting families and providing is necessary. We are here because of strivers which is why nearly everyone has it in them to strive on some level unless you're a genetic dead end. I am making an argument here against naval gazing in general. MOST PEOPLE regardless of gender don't have ANYTHING interesting to say or contribute. JCM is a rarity ipso facto and her collection of art, music, and movies is not the norm. But even still she's a far cry from Francis Ford Coppola it's not like she's going to buy a film camera and start writing and directing a la Kathryn Bigelow. The gap between a normie and a culture enthusiast is substantial and it's something you really only see from whites (Maine is more ethnically white than Norway at this point) or Asians who are hyper Americanized (think Steve Aoki). But the gap between an enthusiast and a genius is like the difference between a millionaire and a billionaire.

I don't know where I'm going with this but I disagree completely and I think you're massaging the point at any rate and the fact that two fempoas bumped this gleefully thinking that you have sorted all their emotions imho is proof positive that you are wrong.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5413569&forum_id=2#48175092)

i also don't see think a person's desire to be seen as an individual beyond their gender role is determined by their talent. everyone wants to be appreciated for who they are beyond their ability to create more children. if you disagree, then why should i consider anything you say unless you've proven your superior talent or masculinity? are you a billionaire, professional athlete, or famous artist?

for as much as you talk about "human nature" you seem to be ignoring that all the stuff i'm saying *IS* human nature and what separates us from animals. we aren't just baby machines. while we are obviously also animals who are biologically programmed to continue the human race, we also did shit like make art and live for things that have nothing to do with procreation. it's odd that you even mention art it is completely unnecessary in terms of creating more babies and the conditions that'll allow them to make babies -- why does someone's talent in making art matter in your conception of the world?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5413569&forum_id=2#48175143)

Similarly "women having personalities" (though rare, and it can happen) is sort of a milquetoast way do define oneself absent any real drive or motivation to conquer. And it's sad when boring guys do it too. But to my earlier points ITT a guy may have to get a green mohawk, a couple tattoos, and do some jail time to "get a personality" because without it he's invisible to women and society at large. Women don't have this downward societal pressure to be something if they don't feel like it. Fempoas on XO are in themselves 99th percentile masculine-brained rarities to begin with (and they all seem to be on some universal level BPD + creative types to some greater or lesser extent).

Btw in response to another comment you made earlier I actually HAVE gotten laid from poasting fwiw. It's got a low ROI as a social investment but it's not a zero!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5413569&forum_id=2#48175174)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nL7hsvPPQzE

a 180 artist friend of mine painted an incredible portrait of bjork for me, its hanging in my bedroom.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5413569&forum_id=2#48174548)

Im sure you enjoyed your whacking 🤣

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5413569&forum_id=2#48174637)

It's not about sex (though obviously I would admittedly DEFINITELY sex bjork if a magic fairy waved a wand and made her interested in me), it's about her being a fucking goddess and incredible woman. I'd rather put her on a pedastal than just bang her.

This is something that 90%+ of men will never understand because they are ruled by their dicks.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5413569&forum_id=2#48175185)