Date: December 29th, 2025 8:04 PM Author: Deep locale
For Gunner’s intel? IIED would be the primary claim.
I have enough money to just hire someone and not worry about it.
Zurich would likely get subpoenaed though.
Am inclined to do it. At this point I could aim a nerf gun at gunner’s head and ask him to stop and he would say fuck you you’ll have to suspend me in cryonite first.
Date: December 29th, 2025 9:03 PM Author: Supple stag film masturbator
I would be absolutely delighted to testify to the Virginia Character & Fitness Committee about how for years you, Christopher Spinelli of Emroch & Kilduff in Richmond, VA used to discuss your ongoing cases here, in this publicly accessible place that is indexed on google, telling us about the confidential and privileged case details of your ongoing, live cases, while mocking your clients, who you repeatedly called niggers, I repeat you called your African-American clients "niggers", mockingly, in a defamatory manner, right here, in public.
Happy to do it. Just let me know where and when, Christopher Spinelli.
Oh and I'm several orders of magnitude more preftigious as an attorney than you. The guys at C&F will be pleased to hear from me.
Date: January 3rd, 2026 11:05 AM Author: ungodly cumskin
To be fair,
Yes.
Please don't forget to name me as a co-defendant in the suit, btw.
I'm literally begging you to do this. I will clear out my schedule just to make sure that we can complete thorough discovery on both sides and take this to trial ASAP.
Date: January 3rd, 2026 11:13 AM Author: ungodly cumskin
To be fair,
Please reconsider before you file, I really want to be a full-blown defendant. I deserve nothing less.
BTW did I mention that you fuck children, call your black clients "niggers," break attorney client privilege, and are an incredibly stupid person and a shitty lawyer?
Date: December 29th, 2025 8:34 PM Author: Fracture in the Maidenhead (gunneratttt)
this is probably just spaceporn bluster but ljl if you actually did loop in your boss and family.
ive offered to call you. we could conference in your bosses too. i would *LOVE* to explain to them the background of your purported harassment in the hopes of settling this presuit.
Date: December 29th, 2025 8:36 PM Author: Misunderstood Dull Goyim Ceo
why the fuck do you continue posting here? you're unliked by literally everyone on here to the point you're actually considering purely vexatious litigation. this will not work out well for you. it will be hilarious for everyone else.
Date: December 29th, 2025 8:27 PM Author: coiffed fuchsia stage
You clearly haven't thought this through. There are 10-20 or more xoxoers who will unequivocally testify that you squanch your kid. True or not, the jury will take one look at you and instantly believe the worst allegations. It's going to be a dogpile scenario with all of xoxo trying to top each other by making up more and more outrageous allegations, and none of it will be actionable. Really, sue a poaster and see how it works out for you.
Date: December 29th, 2025 8:34 PM Author: Adult Friendship Finder
wow
i really like it here, hanging out with so many morally righteous bros who wouldn't hesitate to go to bat to save a helpless trafficked asian child from more squanching
Date: December 29th, 2025 9:00 PM Author: Deep locale
More money for me. Sorry but I will pursue. Keep on with your racist psychosis. It’s literally what drives the action. At least one judgment apiece. After the first $30k in fees paid by me the action will continue of its own accord. I’ll only get a percentage but the IIED continues in this free country w consequences.
Date: January 3rd, 2026 11:10 AM Author: ungodly cumskin
To be fair,
Lmao imagine being the judge presiding over a case where on one side of the aisle, you have dozens of barred attorneys (some undoubtedly preftifiouf) from all across the country who are willing to swear under penalty of perjury that the plaintiff has publicly called his black clients "niggers," broken attorney client privilege for shits and giggles on countless occasions, and made lewd and sexually suggestive comments about his own adopted son.
And on the other side of the aisle, you have a bizarre looking genetic freak 50 year old shitlaw associate with a goofy haircut who inexplicably thinks that he's a genius but obviously can't litigate his way out of a paper bag.
Date: December 29th, 2025 8:29 PM Author: Fracture in the Maidenhead (gunneratttt)
please do it. just like when you threatened to file suit against zurich, tbf, MASE, etc. etc.
i cant wait for oral args. it'll be just like the car honk case when you sputtered 0L arguments about how an intentional act is negligence. can't wait to hear you argue how spamming your burner email soliciting information about me equals *you* being harassed.
Date: December 29th, 2025 8:34 PM Author: coiffed fuchsia stage
imagine the amicus brief gangbang as everyone teams up to humiliate him. all the testimony from poasters he falsely accused. all of his most repulsive and disgusting posts dug up and a bunch of respected lawyers testifying that they were very concerned about the welfare of sp jr.
hey spacecuck why dont you visit korea anytime soon? surely i dont have your real name and employer information, along with an archive of all your defamatory threads you made against me that i can submit to the police and immigration!
it would be SO DIFFICULT for you to be identified if you ever stepped foot here!
he falsely accused me of threatening to rape his son. also claimed that hed contact the FBI. he nuked the FBI thread - along with a bunch of other threads from that period - but its a good thing i have all that shit archived
Date: December 29th, 2025 8:46 PM Author: Fracture in the Maidenhead (gunneratttt)
i dont think there's a single outed poaster spaceporn hasn't also outed. there a very few prominent unoutted poasters he has attempted to out.
his victim complex is stunning. also he's just seeking negative attention, i wasn't even poasting about him when he created this bizarre thread. he saw the grok thread was being redirected toward nyuug so now he's pulling his pants down and begging for his "bullies" to redirect their attention back to him.
Date: December 29th, 2025 8:40 PM Author: Arousing Hyperactive Dopamine
What intel? BTW my understanding is google usually says fuck off to civil subpoenas. Is that not the case? Have you never heard of the Stored Communications Act?
Date: December 29th, 2025 8:44 PM Author: racy forum idea he suggested
maybe to every tom, dick, and harry, but when a major partner in a serious law firm comes calling, you’d better believe they sit up and pay some respect.
Date: December 29th, 2025 9:02 PM Author: spectacular tan jewess
this is good advice.
he'll certainly need some rehabilitation when his true feelings about his black clients comes out, right?
i dunno, i could be wrong - i'm not a high six-figure earning big deal partner, but i always assumed that referring to them as niggers on forums where my identity and place of employment was known would be a bad thing.
Date: December 29th, 2025 9:04 PM Author: coiffed fuchsia stage
you have to win first. enjoy getting thrown out before u reach a jury and paying everyone's attorneys fees, faggot.
-------
Yes, child abuse is generally considered a matter of public interest under anti-SLAPP statutes, as these laws are designed to protect speech related to issues that affect the community and public welfare. Reporting suspected child abuse can be seen as exercising the right to free speech and petition regarding a significant societal concern.
Wikipedia medicalmalpracticelawyers.com
Child Abuse and Public Interest in Anti-SLAPP Statutes
Definition of Public Interest
In the context of anti-SLAPP statutes, public interest refers to issues that affect the community or society at large. This includes topics that provoke public debate or concern, such as child abuse.
Child Abuse as a Public Issue
Child abuse is widely recognized as a serious societal problem. Reporting suspected child abuse often involves public interest because it relates to the welfare of children and community safety.
Legal Context
Many anti-SLAPP statutes protect individuals who speak out on matters of public concern, including child abuse. For instance, if someone reports suspected abuse to authorities, this action is typically considered protected speech under anti-SLAPP laws.
Court Interpretations
Courts have generally upheld that allegations or discussions surrounding child abuse fall within the realm of public interest. This means that lawsuits aimed at silencing individuals who report or discuss such issues may be subject to dismissal under anti-SLAPP provisions.
Conclusion
Child abuse is indeed considered a matter of public interest under anti-SLAPP statutes, providing protections for those who speak out against it.
Date: December 29th, 2025 10:28 PM Author: fragrant elite spot goal in life
Virginia has a famously weak anti-SLAPP statute. That's why all the Trumpmos file suit there when libs on the internet hurt their feelings. All he has to allege is that the accusations were knowingly false, and there's no more anti-SLAPP motion.
I thought you'd said you were an experienced lolyer?
Date: December 29th, 2025 9:06 PM Author: Fracture in the Maidenhead (gunneratttt)
spaceporn you ignored my poast above but im happy to schedule a meet and confer on this with you and your bosses. very happy to discuss this in good faith. i mean, it's not like you're publicly threatening meritless litigation as an unlawful bullying tactic, right?
Date: December 29th, 2025 9:09 PM Author: Deep locale
You are first on the list because Gmail will send address once my guys comply with interstate internet harassment statutes. Don’t worry— you’ll get notice. Maybe EPAH can shut it down.
Date: December 29th, 2025 9:19 PM Author: Fracture in the Maidenhead (gunneratttt)
i'm volunteering to discuss this matter with you, your bosses, counsel, etc.
would you consider it harassment if i called your firm now that you've asserted you've looped in your bosses? is this is a legitimate threat of litigation or just internet banter? because i would be happy to speak to you or anyone else about this.
Date: December 29th, 2025 9:21 PM Author: Supple stag film masturbator
while you're talking to his bosses Bill and Walt, please mention that I would be absolutely delighted to testify to the Virginia Character & Fitness Committee about how for years Christopher Spinelli used to discuss his ongoing cases here, in this publicly accessible place that is indexed on google, telling us about the confidential and privileged case details of his ongoing, live cases, while mocking his clients, who he repeatedly called niggers, I repeat Christopher Spinelli called his African-American clients "niggers", mockingly, in a defamatory manner, right here, in public. Happy to chat to Bill and Walt, Christopher Spinelli's bosses, about that, in anticipation of chatting to VA C&F about it. The public must be protected against racist rogues like Christopher Spinelli.
Date: December 29th, 2025 10:43 PM Author: fragrant elite spot goal in life
Eh, you do seem weirdly obsessed with him, and have obviously posted lots of defamatory things as to which you wouldn't be able to give a plausible explanation as to why you believed them true.
If people here were as vicious and defamatory to me as they are to him, I'd definitely go after them.
Date: December 29th, 2025 11:05 PM Author: racy forum idea he suggested
as a capable attorney, of course you would. but would you advise an inept walking punchline who will almost certainly end up inflicting the lion’s share of pain and suffering upon himself to do the same?
Date: December 29th, 2025 11:11 PM Author: Fracture in the Maidenhead (gunneratttt)
perhaps youve missed the dozens of times he's spammed random lawyers names for days on end because he's misidentified them as me. repeating existing puerile insults (i.e. not defamation as no reasonable person would interpret them as a factual accusation) is a pretty mild retort.
if he went after you irl like he's done to me and countless others you would have already filed suit. ive never even poasted his widely known real name here.
Date: December 30th, 2025 2:31 PM Author: Fracture in the Maidenhead (gunneratttt)
why do you bother mocking people who take jabs at you? why bother poasting at all? we're all here for casual banter for the most part. of course if someone is going on some unhinged campaign against me i'm going to poke fun at them for it. wouldn't you? (haven't you?)
also, i've tried to leave him alone many times. when he came back from his dormant phase this time i made some long compassionate poast encouraging him to stop taking online banter so seriously, or stop coming here if he can't. inevitably he starts acting in such ridiculous ways that i can't resist ridiculing. for example, he's tried to out lex out of no where (lex wasn't even mocking him) by accusing him of being some completely random person.
is it puerile to mock someone behaving like an idiot online? sure, mea culpa. but it's not illegal and it's not even immoral when you do it because he's maliciously targeting innocent people.
Date: December 30th, 2025 2:40 PM Author: fragrant elite spot goal in life
It's a matter of degree, I'd say. Like I was bickering with pumonomyous the other day by asserting that he doesn't have any accomplishments IRL and suggesting he try to PROVE ME WRONG, while he was saying mean things about transkids and my dear wife and her interest in hard drugs.
But I don't think either side of that is defamatory, and not as mean as what you guys post about SP.
Date: December 30th, 2025 2:48 PM Author: Fracture in the Maidenhead (gunneratttt)
when i began megapoasting i clutched my pearls at how mean people were being to spaceporn often. once i got to know him i saw how his maliciousness in frequently attempting to harm people irl far outweighs people being mean to him on xo (and ONLY on xo.)
you're right, it is a matter of degree. and spaceporn deserves all the mockery he's received and then some.
as xo's GC you should be ringing the CEO to ban all of his accounts. last year when he was seeking information about me he literally started outing somebody thinking irl physical harm would happen to him. he breaks the LOTL by outing and attempting to out poasters 100x more than any other permabanned poaster. the only reason he hasn't made xo famous again is because he's too stupid to be effective.
Date: December 30th, 2025 2:20 PM Author: fragrant elite spot goal in life
Nah, better not. I don't get involved in internecine poster disputes. I like everyone here (except TDNW and that pumo who tells me to get a real job bitch).
Date: December 30th, 2025 2:36 PM Author: Fracture in the Maidenhead (gunneratttt)
you will never be able to subpoena google for my ip. if you did, you'd never be able to subpoena my internet provider for my information. and if you did, it would lead you to a non-US VPN because i'm not tech retard like you.
however, if you file suit against john doe aka gunneratttt and poast it here i will voluntarily appear and ruin you. so please poast the complaint when you file it.
Date: December 30th, 2025 2:42 PM Author: Supple stag film masturbator
I do not want it to come to that because what's left of xo would suffer badly and I really like it here. And I don't want you to be put through that. But the one person who will be destroyed by it is Spinelli. And for that part I'll get popcorn - a lot of it.
Date: December 30th, 2025 2:55 PM Author: Fracture in the Maidenhead (gunneratttt)
i would welcome being "put through that." litigating against retards is one of the biggest perks of this gay profession.
the bort wasn't affected at all from epah v. zzz and rt aside from all the 180 content in generated. this would be even more hilarious because spaceporn is far dumber than rt.
Date: January 3rd, 2026 11:23 AM Author: ungodly cumskin
To be fair,
Wow, that's crazy! The law sounds wild!
We normie retards sure are lucky to have a bona fide real-life barred attorney-at-law like you on this message board to explain all of these complicated things to us!
Date: December 29th, 2025 9:03 PM Author: Supple stag film masturbator
I would be absolutely delighted to testify to the Virginia Character & Fitness Committee about how for years you used to discuss your ongoing cases here, in this publicly accessible place that is indexed on google, telling us about the confidential and privileged case details of your ongoing, live cases, while mocking your clients, who you repeatedly called niggers, I repeat you called your African-American clients "niggers", mockingly, in a defamatory manner, right here, in public.
Happy to do it. Just let me know where and when.
Oh and I'm several orders of magnitude more preftigious as an attorney than you. The guys at C&F will be pleased to hear from me.
Date: December 29th, 2025 9:10 PM Author: Supple stag film masturbator
Thank you. That would be helpful. We will chat off-line. I'm sick of this guy. Let's do the citizens of Virginia a favor and get rid of this low-rent racist loser on their behalf.
Date: December 29th, 2025 10:25 PM Author: red double fault
actually, don't. i am kidding. this is seriously going to blow up in your face if you try this. i'm being 100% serious here. god help me, i will watch and laugh but i don't want to see that happen.
Date: December 29th, 2025 10:32 PM Author: Fracture in the Maidenhead (gunneratttt)
spaceporn is a licensed attorney and if he believes he has a legitimate claim he should pursue it vigorously on the public record and employ his vast well of legal acumen
Date: December 30th, 2025 3:12 PM Author: Fracture in the Maidenhead (gunneratttt)
one weird trick:
spaceporn representing spjr files suit against spaceporn, has the suit dismissed with prejudice, and now any claims by spjr in the future are barred by res judicata.
Date: December 31st, 2025 1:15 AM Author: Lascivious meetinghouse factory reset button
This thread on AutoAdmit (xoxohth.com), a law school discussion board known for its unfiltered and often chaotic posts, is a heated, troll-heavy exchange centered on a user threatening legal action against another poster. Here’s a breakdown of what’s happening based on the thread’s content:
Main Topic
The original poster (OP), using the handle “Rakeokc@mail.com” (widely associated with a user nicknamed “Spaceporn” or Christopher Spinelli, a Virginia attorney), is seeking “board input” on filing a John Doe lawsuit to subpoena Gmail for information about another poster called “nude gunner” (handle: gunneratttt). The primary claim mentioned is intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED), stemming from alleged ongoing harassment, defamation, and personal attacks on the board. OP claims they have the funds (e.g., $10k retainer) and “green light” from work and family to pursue it, viewing it as a way to out and repeatedly sue multiple posters (“evergreen” judgments). They mention starting with Gmail subpoenas under “interstate internet harassment statutes” and potentially involving the board’s host (Zurich?).
Key Participants and Stances
• OP (Rakeokc@mail.com/Spaceporn): Adamant about proceeding, threatens judgments against posters like nude gunner, and claims they’ve already paid initial fees and saved the thread. They frame it as self-defense against relentless mockery.
• nude gunner: The main target, who mocks the idea as “bluster” and challenges OP to file publicly, offering to “meet and confer” or voluntarily appear. They argue subpoenas won’t work (citing laws like the Stored Communications Act and Google’s resistance) and predict OP’s humiliation.
• Don Spaceporn De La Squancha: A vocal antagonist (ironically sharing a similar moniker), repeatedly offers to testify against OP to the Virginia Bar’s Character & Fitness Committee, citing OP’s alleged past posts mocking clients with racial slurs (e.g., calling African-American clients “niggers”) and leaking case details. They express delight in potential fallout.
• Taylor Swift is not a hobby she is a lifestyle: Sides against OP, offering archived posts for evidence and suggesting it’s time to “put this one to bed” (i.e., end OP’s behavior).
• Other notable posters (e.g., Ban Christopher Spinelli from this forum, probate or die, Lab Diamond Dallas Trump, nyuug, Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband): Mostly mock OP’s plan as doomed to fail, predict a “dogpile” of counter-testimonies (e.g., on child abuse allegations), and warn of career ruin. Some offer to report OP ethically or countersue; one (Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband) discusses Virginia’s weak anti-SLAPP laws but declines involvement in “internecine poster disputes.”
Major Themes and Arguments
• Legal Discussions: Debates on feasibility include subpoena challenges (Google often resists civil requests), anti-SLAPP protections (Virginia is weak, but child abuse allegations could qualify as public interest speech), defamation defenses (truth as a shield), and ethics (duty to report bar violations). OP insists it’s viable; others call it vexatious and predict dismissal with fee-shifting.
• Personal Attacks and Feuds: Heavy on insults—OP is accused of racism, child abuse (“squanching” an adopted son), pedophilia, low IQ, and being a “retard.” OP retorts by threatening suits. Cross-feuds emerge, like nyuug (a Korean poster) threatening to report OP to authorities if they visit Korea, based on past defamation.
• Humor and Absurdity: The thread is laced with memes (e.g., “180” for approval, “DO NOT REDEEM!!!!”), AI-generated image links mocking OP (via grok.com/imagine), and ridiculous suggestions (e.g., “sue yourself,” “Adopted Son Sues: The Art of War”). Laughter abounds, like at OP admitting they “just learned how to save a webpage today.”
• Tangents: Strays into unrelated jabs (e.g., one poster’s Tinder dates with “WOCs,” holiday well-wishes, or deporting someone). Some express concern the lawsuit could harm the board but relish the drama.
Overall Tone and Progression
The tone is aggressively satirical, chaotic, and mean-spirited—typical AutoAdmit fare—with rapid escalation from serious threats to pile-on mockery and “ljl” (laughing joke laugh) reactions. It starts (12/29/25) with OP’s proposal drawing immediate ridicule and counter-threats, peaks mid-thread with testimony offers and AI memes, and winds down (12/30-31/25) with dares to file and comedic predictions of OP’s downfall. By the end, it’s more entertainment than serious advice, with posters treating it as “crossover content” or movie material. No one seems to take the lawsuit threat fully seriously, viewing it as self-destructive bluster.
This board is infamous for anonymous trolling, so much of this could be exaggerated or performative. If it’s real-world legal drama, it’s speculative and not advisable without professional advice—I’m just summarizing the public discussion.
Date: January 16th, 2026 5:07 PM Author: Vigorous cowardly gas station ladyboy
SP - Lynn Conway here. I have been appointed as Gunner's representative in this matter. I will be paying a visit to your office to discuss an amicable resolution. No need to arrange an appointment, I'll be there.
Date: November 3rd, 2026 2:46 AM Author: お尻のほっぺた (✅🍑)
I’m very upset that this never happened. The entertainment value would have been off the charts.
As the premier bumper of SP threads over several years, and as the target of many failed attempts by SP to identify my irl (including when he was certain I was Sam Hyde and then Steven Crowder and a bunch of others), I am also slightly miffed that gunner was his primary lolsuit target not me.