The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
RATE this DLA piper lawyer's suit
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 26th, 2013 9:34 PM Author: ultramarine market http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/03/25/suit-offers-a-peek-at-the-practice-of-padding-a-legal-bill/?hp (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#22886198) |
Date: March 26th, 2013 9:34 PM Author: marvelous meetinghouse bbw That's the business owner that's suing them. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#22886208) |
 |
Date: June 2nd, 2014 7:36 PM Author: Topaz Parlor Cuckoldry And his suit is hideous. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#25675233) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2013 9:36 PM Author: ultramarine market i realize this but i wanted people to click on this thread (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#22886217) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2013 9:37 PM Author: comical chapel liquid oxygen Hey man that's not the lawyer its the business owner who's suing DLA. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#22886230) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:09 PM Author: yapping site It says more about your desperate trolling attempts than it ever could about the wearer. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256254) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:13 PM Author: crawly concupiscible theater haunted graveyard Almost as bad as his comb-over (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256273) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:21 PM Author: Confused Patrolman Set dla piper is one the worst firms to do discovery shit with, epsecially e-discovery. these emails must've been turned over by earl or another disgruntled former assoc right? no fucking way did dla piper turn these over in some rfp "all emails relating to billing plaintiff." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256324) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:33 PM Author: Flirting location The matter was being handled by a seventh year associate who probably had a bunch of ther shit going on and decided to mail it in on this matter because it wasn't billable. Whoops. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256414) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:35 PM Author: Confused Patrolman Set bro seriously. was there discovery shit in front of the magistrate? i can't imagine they held onto this on their server. you think the other side won a motion to get a forensic comp sci dork in their building to look for emails with certain search terms? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256430) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:52 PM Author: Flirting location What's the alternative, that one of the recipients of the smoking gun emails emailed them in to the plaintiff? They're all lawyers and they could all seriously fuck themselves for having done so. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256548) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:53 PM Author: Confused Patrolman Set let's say you're an associate sending them email. the receiver finds you after the suit is filed and says "bro, i deleted my email, you took it out of your sent file, right?"
what happens? |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 5:00 PM Author: Flirting location Bro I really have no idea what you're talking about here but maybe that's because I'm not a litigation masterman. Given the stuff i've read, the most likely explanation to me was that DLA tossed this at an associate on partner track, he mailed it in and decided to do a document dump that ended up fucking him in the ass. And yes, I do think DLA would have had these emails on their server. I know my firm would have. So all it would have taken was a doc request with the relevant attorneys' names and dates. I think that's more plausible than one of the recipients, who presumably no longer works there, knowing about the suit and sending these incriminating emails to the plaintiff. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256622) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 5:02 PM Author: Confused Patrolman Set you seriously think they would admit to the email's existence and not say "RFP 12) attached find 4,651 emails to and from john smith containing the term "widgets 123?" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256636) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 5:05 PM Author: Flirting location Dude, again, I'm not a lit masterman, but the fucking article itself says the emails were included in 250,000 pages of docs turned over by DLA. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256663) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:26 PM Author: Confused Patrolman Set (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256351) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:38 PM Author: Mauve fluffy national twinkling uncleanness how come one of the stripes just disappears?!? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256457) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:41 PM Author: Confused Patrolman Set on their logo? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256472) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:44 PM Author: Mauve fluffy national twinkling uncleanness oh, i guess that's where 2 pieces were joined. looks weird as fuck with the wide guido stripes. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256486) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:45 PM Author: Confused Patrolman Set want to venture a guess at my question above? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256492) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:48 PM Author: Mauve fluffy national twinkling uncleanness sorry bro, i don't see what you're talking about (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256515) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:50 PM Author: Confused Patrolman Set in the article the quotes from assocs about churning hours the plaintiff is using as evidence. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256528) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:56 PM Author: Mauve fluffy national twinkling uncleanness bro i thought we were talking about suits.
i don't work in lit so i'm not sure how jewy dla is w/ discovery. |
|
Date: June 2nd, 2014 7:34 PM Author: obsidian zippy hell (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#25675228) |