The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Minimum school to have comfortable shot at V-100?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 1st, 2009 12:10 AM Author: Flickering Balding Chad Station Am applying to LS next cycle. What kinda schools do you see median being safe for a V-100 at that far out? Keep in mind, that would make it 3 years till 2L summer. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031170&forum_id=2#12129468) |
 |
Date: July 1st, 2009 12:12 AM Author: Low-t Bat-shit-crazy Dysfunction t14 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031170&forum_id=2#12129490) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2009 12:13 AM Author: Shimmering razzle half-breed I would literally crack you in the face with a frying pan as hard as I could if you were right in front of me. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031170&forum_id=2#12129501) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2009 1:02 AM Author: Slimy Legend tcr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031170&forum_id=2#12129929) |
Date: July 1st, 2009 12:12 AM Author: Autistic Disgusting Preventive Strike HYS. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031170&forum_id=2#12129492) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2009 12:13 AM Author: Ebony Stimulating Hell tcr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031170&forum_id=2#12129498) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2009 12:13 AM Author: adventurous boistinker office there are literally millions of law firms out there. for v100 i think u need H or Y. Stanford just doesnt cut it anymore. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031170&forum_id=2#12129499) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2009 12:30 AM Author: Flickering Balding Chad Station Any helpful responses. I MIGHT have believed CCN.
Edit: T-14 would be nice but isn't that a tad optimistic? |
|
Date: July 1st, 2009 12:33 AM Author: Aromatic roommate shrine what do you think is the difference for you career-wise between say a V80 firm and an unranked firm that still pays market wherever you're at?
in case that wasn't clear, kill yourself you striver faggot. People like you are why law sucks so bad. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2009 12:42 AM Author: Garnet ticket booth jesus. there are some real psychos here. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031170&forum_id=2#12129750) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2009 12:52 AM Author: Aromatic roommate shrine i agree. only an insane idiot would seriously demand that a board like XO tell him what is "safe" for V100 in a few years. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031170&forum_id=2#12129841) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2009 12:38 AM Author: Outnumbered stage there is no "minimum" or "safe" school. no one knows if biglaw is even going to be around in 3 years (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031170&forum_id=2#12129715) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2009 12:40 AM Author: Flickering Balding Chad Station Pay market would also suffice. I guess thats what I was asking in the first place. 160 + bonus and all that jazz. Hell, a lot of V-100's are not even doing that any more. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031170&forum_id=2#12129737) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2009 12:42 AM Author: Aromatic roommate shrine top half at T6, top third T14, top 10% at a T1, top 5% at any other quasi-decent schools, top three students in your class at a true TTT.
that's as good as anyone could possibly know. now return to your virginal career gunning in peace. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2009 1:01 AM Author: Frozen circlehead parlour I'm top half at a T6 (knock on wood before last grade) and don't feel safe. You need to bid and interview well.
This question is silly. If I weren't in Law School, I would follow the market until 2013. If the writing on the wall is clear by then that 160k will not exist, go with a scholarship somewhere halfway decent and hope for the best. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2009 12:41 AM Author: Frozen circlehead parlour Of course. Microsoft will hire a few local guys to do their big corporate deals. Bill will ask around. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031170&forum_id=2#12129741) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2009 12:57 AM Author: Flickering Balding Chad Station So, you are seriously saying that there is no difference between DCGN and MVP at this point? Deciding between ED to Penn and NYU. Prefer Penn for personal reasons, was wondering if NYU gives a big enough boost to justify going there instead. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031170&forum_id=2#12129896) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2009 1:05 AM Author: Flickering Balding Chad Station Damnit, top half at a T-6 not safe. WTF happens to someone like that if they don't get Biglaw, since midlaw is a mith what is it, shitlaw? I somehow doubt that Mr. 50% at Chicago is going to go work at shitlaw even ITE. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031170&forum_id=2#12129961) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2009 1:12 AM Author: Frozen circlehead parlour Nobody is safe ITE. A graduating 3L got a CoA clerkship with a feeder judge (think Kozinski, Wilkinson, Sack), but could not find a firm job in Chicago. Sad, but true. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031170&forum_id=2#12130024) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2009 1:17 AM Author: Flickering Balding Chad Station Oh, sweet, suffering Jesus. Hell, my dream was fucking T-14-Median (I like to be conservative)-Biglaw in Phoenix, I thought that was a practical goal.
Might that be cuz they don't want to pay clerkship bonus. just grasping at straws here. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2009 1:30 AM Author: Magenta Messiness It's probably b/c firms don't have enough work for the associates they already have and already want them to leave. Why the hell would they want another one? Regardless of their unproven resume (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1031170&forum_id=2#12130245) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2009 1:33 AM Author: Autistic Disgusting Preventive Strike Phoenix? why the fuck didn't you say so.
1) GO to Wayne State 2) ????? 3) PROFIT |
|
Date: July 1st, 2009 1:44 AM Author: Flickering Balding Chad Station Unless the ??? is graduate 1st in your class, this is sadly not credited.
And yes, swanky monkey, I agree that it is unlikely, as I said, just grasping at straws. |