The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
so fun styling all over these shit ID firms in fed court
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 13th, 2013 9:40 PM Author: marvelous green azn they all think they are so sophisticated compared to plaintiffs' lawyers. just lol @ these TTTs that think removing to fed court is going to be a big advantage for them. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2255282&forum_id=2#23192641) |
 |
Date: May 13th, 2013 9:53 PM Author: Vivacious fuchsia library waht is this (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2255282&forum_id=2#23192751) |
Date: May 13th, 2013 9:54 PM Author: kink-friendly office how do they remove to federal court? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2255282&forum_id=2#23192761) |
|
Date: May 13th, 2013 9:57 PM Author: Copper misunderstood address (literal retard) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2255282&forum_id=2#23192776) |
|
Date: May 13th, 2013 10:00 PM Author: Amber Fat Ankles From the mouth of a Crocodile,
You sir, are a retard
CHOMP CHOMP |
|
Date: May 13th, 2013 10:01 PM Author: kink-friendly office so you've never gone to law school? got it. generally you have to file a motion stating, you know, the reasons for removal. but i'm sure these id firms are just filing removals to fed ct all day nbd. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2255282&forum_id=2#23192812) |
|
Date: May 13th, 2013 10:03 PM Author: Copper misunderstood address what do you mean "the reasons for removal"? are you fucking retarded? are you trying to say they need to state the basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction? jfc. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2255282&forum_id=2#23192837) |
|
Date: May 13th, 2013 10:04 PM Author: kink-friendly office lol at you opening your mouth to a federal lit masterman. wtf do you think i mean by the basis for removal? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2255282&forum_id=2#23192847) |
|
Date: May 13th, 2013 10:07 PM Author: Copper misunderstood address lol at you being a lit "masterman." just lol.
and you sound fucking retarded saying the "reasons for removal." the "reason" is that the removing party wants to be in fucking federal court, retard. the source of federal subject matter jurisdiction is something else. it's going to be diversity or a federal statute and supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims, like every other fucking lawsuit in the world.
please, don't try to participate in litigation threads. |
|
Date: May 13th, 2013 10:10 PM Author: glassy motley brethren preventive strike jesus stoop stop he's already dead (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2255282&forum_id=2#23192903) |
|
Date: May 13th, 2013 10:11 PM Author: kink-friendly office lol a maf pumo chink. go back to your state court clerking job before you sound more retarded. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2255282&forum_id=2#23192913) |
|
Date: May 13th, 2013 10:13 PM Author: glassy motley brethren preventive strike that pumo above pwnd the shit out of you. sorry. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2255282&forum_id=2#23192934) |
|
Date: May 13th, 2013 10:15 PM Author: kink-friendly office by telling me how he does state shitlaw insurance claims? or by me asking how the fuck some shit pip case ends up in fed court?
there's plenty of bs in fed ct. i.e. every flsa claim sitting at a scheduling order hearing while real lawyers are sitting on the bench billing their clients watching some fags argue about $400 in missed OT payments. |
|
Date: May 13th, 2013 10:10 PM Author: kink-friendly office are you seriously retarded? you think there was any conceivable way to infer anything but "reason" referring to legal basis rather than the retarded goal of some montana stern associate? i'd bet my life the number of jury trials i've won in fed court is higher than your mbe score. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2255282&forum_id=2#23192908) |
|
Date: May 14th, 2013 6:10 PM Author: slippery abode Just stop MoreDoughHi; you've been beat (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2255282&forum_id=2#23198786) |
|
Date: May 13th, 2013 10:05 PM Author: Useless Hunting Ground To be fair,
Don't talk to a former-D1-athlete-turned-biglaw-partner like that, pumo |
|
Date: May 13th, 2013 11:05 PM Author: thriller patrolman (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2255282&forum_id=2#23193433) |
|
Date: May 14th, 2013 12:28 PM Author: Histrionic Sapphire Messiness please tell me this is a new thing, the croc chomp chomp - i laffed (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2255282&forum_id=2#23196439) |
|
Date: May 13th, 2013 11:18 PM Author: marvelous green azn They file a notice of removal claiming diversity. We usually name an instate defendant but even when we do they try to claim it's a sham. Hasn't worked yet. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2255282&forum_id=2#23193574) |
|
Date: May 13th, 2013 9:56 PM Author: anal carnelian public bath Aren't the verdicts lower on average in federal court? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2255282&forum_id=2#23192769) |
|
Date: May 14th, 2013 12:22 PM Author: marvelous green azn Yeah. I'm not saying it's not smart of them to do -- fed court is almost always worse for plaintiffs since you need a unanimous jury. It's just when I get on meet and confer phone calls with them they always act like they are going to dominate me in motion practice now that they are in front a fed judge even though most of them went to shit unaccredited schools. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2255282&forum_id=2#23196406) |
|
Date: May 13th, 2013 11:03 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle resort plaintiff's personal injury firms are cream of the crop huh (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2255282&forum_id=2#23193410) |
|
Date: May 13th, 2013 11:16 PM Author: marvelous green azn Not at all. It's just amusing these ID firms, most of which are populated with arrogant ttts like shitlaw steve, think they are federal lit mastermen or something and that they are pulling a fast one by removing a case. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2255282&forum_id=2#23193547) |
|
Date: May 14th, 2013 11:53 AM Author: Scarlet trailer park legal warrant It sounds like your state court strategy just got derailed. U MAD? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2255282&forum_id=2#23196278) |
|
Date: May 14th, 2013 12:02 PM Author: sienna space degenerate (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2255282&forum_id=2#23196331) |