Clean river is superior

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590496&forum_id=2#48061176)

I'll take ocean or mountains ftw.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590496&forum_id=2#48063127)

Reasoning:

- Deep lakes in mountain regions are 180

- Ocean have crowded beaches and crowded docks and there are things in it that will kill you if the ocean doesnt kill you first

- Rivers: there is always something evil upstream

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590496&forum_id=2#48063144)

Analysis of the Discussion

1. Initial Post:

Content: Secret Knowledge poses a comparative question about the quality of people associated with different types of water bodies—ocean, lake, and river.

Tone: The tone is somewhat provocative, aiming to spark debate rather than present a definitive opinion.

2. Response by barnabyjones (September 7th, 2024 9:07 PM):

Content: Barnabyjones argues that lakes are superior for various recreational activities and dismisses the ocean’s benefits.

Tone: The tone is defensive of lake living and dismissive of the ocean, suggesting that lakes offer practical advantages.

Implications: This response highlights a preference for lakes due to their suitability for specific activities and perceived safety compared to oceans.

3. Response by Secret Knowledge (September 7th, 2024 9:07 PM):

Content: Secret Knowledge counters barnabyjones’s point by emphasizing the health benefits of saltwater compared to potentially contaminated lake water.

Tone: The tone is somewhat dismissive of lake water, suggesting it may be unsanitary.

Implications: This response underscores the perceived health benefits of ocean water and critiques lake water's cleanliness.

4. Response by barnabyjones (September 7th, 2024 9:09 PM):

Content: Barnabyjones expresses a strong negative opinion about the ocean, noting dangers and public beach conditions.

Tone: The tone is highly critical of the ocean, suggesting it is unsafe and unpleasant.

Implications: This reinforces a preference for lakes and rivers over the ocean, highlighting perceived hazards.

5. Response by MASE (September 8th, 2024 3:26 PM):

Content: MASE’s response is a single word: "Devestating."

Tone: The tone is unclear due to the brevity, but it may indicate a strong reaction or acknowledgment of a point made earlier.

Implications: The brief response might suggest agreement or dismay at the discussion’s direction.

6. Response by freed mason (September 8th, 2024 4:05 PM):

Content: Freed mason suggests that motor sports should be banned in lakes, implying a negative impact on lake environments.

Tone: The tone is critical of motor sports and their effect on lakes.

Implications: This response reflects a concern for environmental impact and aligns with a preference for cleaner, quieter lakes.

7. Response by ................,.......,, (Slava Russiya, Slava Kharkov) (September 8th, 2024 3:25 PM):

Content: This response dismisses rivers and lakes due to bugs, preferring the ocean or mountains.

Tone: The tone is dismissive of rivers and lakes, suggesting they are less desirable due to insects.

Implications: The preference for the ocean and mountains reflects a dislike for certain features of rivers and lakes.

8. Response by hank_scorpio (September 8th, 2024 3:27 PM):

Content: Hank_scorpio argues that lakes are best for recreation, while rivers are better for living due to their economic benefits.

Tone: The tone is balanced, suggesting practical advantages of both lakes and rivers.

Implications: This response provides a nuanced view, recognizing the strengths of both lakes and rivers for different purposes.

9. Response by ( ''.'' ) (September 8th, 2024 3:36 PM):

Content: This response ranks lakes, oceans, and rivers based on personal preference, citing specific drawbacks and advantages.

Tone: The tone is analytical and somewhat critical, providing a comparative evaluation.

Implications: The ranking reflects individual preferences and criticisms of each water body.

10. Response by Pumonymous (September 8th, 2024 4:03 PM):

Content: Pumonymous makes a comparison using "Greyjoy" (ocean) and "Tully" (river), referencing the Game of Thrones houses.

Tone: The tone is playful and comparative, using a fictional analogy.

Implications: This response adds a humorous and cultural reference to the discussion, emphasizing a preference for the ocean.

11. Response by young Boasthard (September 8th, 2024 4:26 PM):

Content: Young Boasthard strongly favors the ocean over rivers and lakes, disparaging those who prefer standing water.

Tone: The tone is dismissive and derisive of lake and river preferences.

Implications: This response reflects a strong preference for the ocean, with a critical view of other water bodies.

Broader Context

Cultural and Environmental Factors: The discussion reflects varying attitudes towards different water bodies based on environmental conditions, recreational opportunities, and personal preferences.

Personal Bias: Responses reveal personal biases and cultural references, such as the Game of Thrones analogy and environmental concerns, influencing opinions on lakes, rivers, and oceans.

In summary, the discussion is a lively debate with diverse opinions on the relative merits of living by or engaging with oceans, lakes, and rivers. The responses illustrate a range of perspectives, from environmental concerns to personal preferences, and highlight how cultural and practical factors shape views on different types of water bodies.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590496&forum_id=2#48063695)