~Law School Rankings according to USN Lawyers/Judges Survey ONLY
| startled ocher windowlicker orchestra pit | 04/15/07 | | Aromatic ebony locus cumskin | 04/15/07 | | startled ocher windowlicker orchestra pit | 04/15/07 | | frum fuchsia senate hissy fit | 04/15/07 | | startled ocher windowlicker orchestra pit | 04/15/07 | | adventurous bright party of the first part | 04/15/07 | | Godawful meetinghouse | 04/15/07 | | frum fuchsia senate hissy fit | 04/15/07 | | titillating white institution idiot | 04/15/07 | | frum fuchsia senate hissy fit | 04/15/07 | | titillating white institution idiot | 04/15/07 | | frum fuchsia senate hissy fit | 04/15/07 | | Godawful meetinghouse | 04/15/07 | | titillating white institution idiot | 04/15/07 | | Overrated mauve theatre | 04/15/07 | | burgundy clown theater stage | 04/15/07 | | startled ocher windowlicker orchestra pit | 04/15/07 | | spruce unholy tank | 04/15/07 | | startled ocher windowlicker orchestra pit | 04/15/07 | | Glassy Codepig Boiling Water | 04/15/07 | | Soul-stirring feces dopamine | 04/15/07 | | Soul-stirring feces dopamine | 04/15/07 | | Glassy Codepig Boiling Water | 04/15/07 | | Odious brass box office | 04/15/07 | | startled ocher windowlicker orchestra pit | 04/15/07 | | Stirring Kitchen | 04/15/07 | | startled ocher windowlicker orchestra pit | 04/15/07 | | Soggy Marketing Idea Chapel | 04/15/07 | | titillating white institution idiot | 04/15/07 | | Swollen Stubborn Volcanic Crater Really Tough Guy | 04/15/07 | | narrow-minded aphrodisiac nursing home depressive | 04/15/07 | | startled ocher windowlicker orchestra pit | 04/15/07 | | irradiated property | 04/15/07 | | Drab lettuce | 04/15/07 | | startled ocher windowlicker orchestra pit | 04/15/07 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 15th, 2007 1:18 PM Author: startled ocher windowlicker orchestra pit Subject: Today I will change your life.
pres·tige, n.
1. The level of respect at which one is regarded by others; standing.
PREFACE:
When a decadent and/or shrewd individual decides to pursue a juris doctor, she must take into account the weight of prestige of the degrees offered by the country's motley of academic institutions. But whose metrics of prestige should be favored in this analysis? Leiter's? Cooley's (http://www.cooley.edu/rankings/ )?
Convention tells us that U.S. World News Law School Rankings is the one true knighter of prestige. I respectfully diverge...
As the matter of prestige is wholly a matter of reputation, I dare say that prestige is best viewed through the lens of the people. U.S. News does a fine job of ranking academic QUALITY, but not academic PRESTIGE.
Now, granted, I don't reccommend a country-wide survey of all citizens be conducted asking which law schools are the most prestigious. This is primarily because only a small portion of the populous comprises the audience which assigns prestige to the institutions in legal academia: lawyers and judges. Note that I don't include legal academia itself in this "audience" (hence my omitting the USN peer ranking) because it is quite unprestigious to ask legal academia to prestige rank itself.
Some of you may find my angle vexing, and I make no apologies. I will not preemptively respond to criticisms, though I do invite you to leave them below. Debate will most certainly ensue.
However, I am confident that many of you will find these rankings enlightening, compensating for your doubts in the overall USN law school ranking system. You will notice many interesting deviations in the ranking of particular schools between the two systems. You will also notice that my Tier/Echelon system is revolutionary, and astutely brilliant, and I thank you for your praise for this in advance.
And now...
THE XOXO PRESTIGE RANKINGS, as measured by USN's 2007 assessment score by lawyer's and judges.
*Tier 1/1st Echelon*
[Scores < 5.0]
1. Yale (4.8)
1. Harvard
1 Stanford
4. Columbia (4.7)
4. U. Chicago
6. NYU (4.6)
6. Michigan
6. UVA
9. Boalt (4.5)
9. UPenn
*Tier 1/2nd Echelon*
[Scores < 4.5]
11. Cornell (4.4)
11. Duke
11. Northwestern
14. Georgetown (4.3)
14. Univ. of Texas
14. Vanderbilt
17. UCLA (4.0)
17. UNC
*Tier 1/3rd Echelon*
[Scores < 4.0]
19. Emory (3.9)
20. GWU (3.8)
20. U.C.-Hast.
20. Minn.
20. Notre Dame
20. W&L
20. WU-STL
26. Boston Col. (3.7)
26. W&M
26. U. Illinois
26. Iowa
26 USC
26. Wisconsin
32. Boston U. (3.6)
32. Fordham
32. Ohio State
32. U.C.-Davis
32. Wake Forest
37. Indiana-BL (3.5)
37. Florida
37. U. Washington
*Tier 1/4th Echelon*
[< 3.5]
40. Grg Mason (3.4)
40. Tulane
42. American (3.3)
42. Baylor
42. BYU
42. Case-Western
42. SMU
42. Alabama
42. U. Pitt.
42. Villanova
Tier 2/1st Echelon
[< 3.25]
50. Temple (3.2)
50 Colorado
50. Georgia
53. Penn St. (3.1)
53. Rutgers [Both]
53. St. Louis
53. Arizona
53. Kansas
53. Maryland
53. Missouri
53. Oregon
53. Tennessee
62. Arizona St. (3.0)
62. Catholic
62. Florida St.
62. Louisiana St.
62. Loyola-Chicago
62. Seton Hall
62. U. Cincinnati
62. U. Conn
62. U. Kentucky
62. U. Miami
62. Nebraska
62. Oklahoma
62. Michigan St. ***
62. Mississippi ***
Tier 2/2nd Echelon
[< 3.0]
76. Loyola-CA (2.9)
76. Marquette
76. Pepperdine
76. U. Richmond
76. South Carolina
76. Utah
76. Yeshiva-Cardozo
76. Syracuse ***
84. Depaul (2.8)
84. Chicago-Kent
84. Indiana-INDY
84. Santa Clara
84. U. Seattle
84. St. Johns
84. Buffalo-SUNY
84. U. Denver
84. U. Houston
84. U. San Fran.
84. Gonzaga ***
84. Hofstra ***
84. Loyola-NO ***
84. Arkansas ***
84. South Dakota ++++
*Tier 2/3rd Echelon*
[Scores <2.75]
97. Brooklyn (2.7)
97. Lewis & Clark
97. New Mexico
97. Creighton ***
97. Howard ***
97. U. Wyoming ***
97. Duquesne ++++
97. Valparaiso ++++
***- denotes jump from U.S. News Tier 3
++++- denotes jump from U.S. News Tier 4
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613656&forum_id=2#7935379)
|
 |
Date: April 15th, 2007 1:42 PM Author: Godawful meetinghouse
Uh, 1) no fighting so far, 2) there are 'fights' for the number four spot, 3) subtle troll for T4
You're right, though, someone IS retarded.
*nods head toward no and rolls eyes*
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613656&forum_id=2#7935491) |
 |
Date: April 15th, 2007 1:45 PM Author: titillating white institution idiot
>*nods head toward and rolls eyes about no*
haha.
*shakes fists angrily at skippy. take out wizard staff and cast level 4 fireball.*
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613656&forum_id=2#7935506) |
Date: April 15th, 2007 1:42 PM Author: Soul-stirring feces dopamine
*Waits for EMORY student to arrive*
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613656&forum_id=2#7935490) |
Date: April 15th, 2007 1:47 PM Author: Soul-stirring feces dopamine
PWN3D!!!
Reply
Date: April 15th, 2007 1:44 PM
Author: emory student (yes, THE emory)
credited! everyone knows that EMORY is a legit T20.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613656&forum_id=2#7935498)
ReplyEdit Your Message
Date: April 15th, 2007 1:42 PM
Author: Civility to XOXO (RETIRED)
*Waits for EMORY student to arrive*
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613656&forum_id=2#7935511) |
Date: April 15th, 2007 1:48 PM Author: Odious brass box office
awesome ranking based on sweet 5% response rate
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613656&forum_id=2#7935515) |
Date: April 15th, 2007 1:50 PM Author: Stirring Kitchen
The flaw in your reasoning is this - why should the subset of us who focus exclusively on the elite T14 care what "judges and lawyers" think about those schools? I care what federal district and court of appeals judges and supreme court justices think, and I care what BIGLAW partners in about 5 cities think. I care what lawyers for some parts of the federal government think. And that's it.
Your ranking dirties the mix with unwashed state judges, small firm and solo practitioner toiletheads, administrative hearing officers, people in Tampa and Indianapolis, etc.
HTH
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613656&forum_id=2#7935537) |
 |
Date: April 15th, 2007 2:11 PM Author: startled ocher windowlicker orchestra pit
Who do you think is actually more likely to respond to a USN ranking survey? A tampa personal injury lawyer or a douchebag BIGLAW associate in NYC?
This is not to assert that I think you're entirely off here. Perhaps this ranking is more useful to understanding the T25-T100 than the T14.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613656&forum_id=2#7935684) |
Date: April 15th, 2007 2:46 PM Author: irradiated property
why the hell should we accept the views of 'judges and lawyers' as more legit than the overall rankings?
At best I think any single lawyer or judge could truly have a substantive opinion of four or five schools (from personal experience working with grads from such schools or from teaching there/knowing students there or whatnot). The rest of their ranking probably comes from how USnews ranked schools while they were applying, or from past issues they have looked at.
For example, a judge in Chicago has no business ranking BU vs BC having not met one single grad, or stepped into either school once in his career, or talked to a single professor from either school. And I bet this is the norm rather than the exception for lawyers and judges, thy just don't have that kind of experience.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613656&forum_id=2#7935851) |
 |
Date: April 15th, 2007 3:24 PM Author: Drab lettuce
I agree. Further, an academic is likely to have a better understanding of the relative qualities of schools. For that reason I look mainly at the Peer Assessment Score. Further, for other disciplines, peer assessment is the entire rank, so clearly it is more meaningful in the grander scheme of things.
I disagree that the overall rankings mean anything, because UsNews does not measure school quality as much as it measures a school's ability to manipulate statistics.
Truth is that peer rep scores closely mirrors true quality and prestige in the legal field.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613656&forum_id=2#7936124) |
 |
Date: April 15th, 2007 4:00 PM Author: startled ocher windowlicker orchestra pit
It doesn't matter whether or not they have a more "legitimate" claim to ranking schools, all that matters is that THEY are the only audience that matters. We are talking about "prestige" here-- not academic "quality"
Read again: The matter of prestige is wholly a matter of reputation. U.S. News does a fine job of ranking academic QUALITY, but not PRESTIGE.
HTFH
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613656&forum_id=2#7936326) |
|
|