The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Latham's long term pwning
| hilarious market crotch | 06/30/09 |
| Boyish laser beams new version | 06/30/09 |
| cyan galvanic orchestra pit | 06/30/09 |
| Exciting turdskin telephone | 06/30/09 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 30th, 2009 9:30 AM Author: hilarious market crotch so, no other top firm has pulled a latham. doesn't this put them at a big disadvantage in recruiting? since they had that other incident in the 90s, people are connecting the dots and viewing this as latham's mo.
so, wouldn't it have been better for them to take the short term hit like the other top firms are doing instead of pwning themselves? worse recruits will translate into less money in the long term. not to mention they injected about 400 attorneys (counting the stealths) into the market who likely do not view them favorably. some will land in positions where they can withhold business from latham. not to mention the effects of the trash talking. |
 |
Date: June 30th, 2009 3:22 PM Author: Boyish laser beams new version titcop (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1030621&forum_id=2#12125150) |
|
Date: June 30th, 2009 4:19 PM Author: cyan galvanic orchestra pit #3 on the A-list.
http://abovethelaw.com/2009/06/the_am_law_a-list_isnt_kind_to.php?show=comments#comments LOL |
|
Date: June 30th, 2009 10:49 PM Author: Exciting turdskin telephone that survey is from spring 2008, back when Latham was making its "no layoffs" promise. but nice try. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1030621&forum_id=2#12128795) |