\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

SMART REPUBLICANS: Do they exist?

How is it that roughly half the country subscribes to an eco...
very tactful parlour
  07/25/12
Tax breaks that aren't met with a corresponding spending dec...
high-end bipolar stag film psychic
  07/25/12
not on XOXO that's for sure
Pungent half-breed codepig
  07/25/12
yfwgi
flesh nighttime corner
  07/25/12
A cogent and thorough response, sir.
very tactful parlour
  07/25/12
ur post doesn't warrant a response "How is it that r...
flesh nighttime corner
  07/25/12
180
sienna bat-shit-crazy lodge voyeur
  07/25/12
pwn pwn pwn
galvanic topaz coldplay fan
  07/25/12
You seriously think Vedder is a "respected" econom...
very tactful parlour
  07/25/12
To be fair, (Random dipshit on the internet, authoritativ...
Razzmatazz parlor jewess
  07/25/12
lol @ this clown college dropout getting destroyed.
Coral glittery business firm main people
  07/25/12
The vast majority of Republicans are Keynesian and/or neo-cl...
maniacal cracking pit
  07/25/12
You are retarded.
Glassy Deep Sweet Tailpipe
  07/25/12
My response is both pertinent and factually correct. Republi...
maniacal cracking pit
  07/25/12
tcr
Poppy Toilet Seat Plaza
  07/25/12
"How is it that roughly half the country subscribes to ...
sienna bat-shit-crazy lodge voyeur
  07/25/12
funny you recommend someone go post on a site that despises ...
Jade Hospital
  07/25/12
Explain the 5 Nobel Laureates in economics who wrote in Geor...
sienna bat-shit-crazy lodge voyeur
  07/25/12
Explain your being a pumo
very tactful parlour
  07/25/12
Explain Harvard's economics department.
sienna bat-shit-crazy lodge voyeur
  07/25/12
Explain Stanford's economics department.
sienna bat-shit-crazy lodge voyeur
  07/25/12
Explain Ben Bernanke.
sienna bat-shit-crazy lodge voyeur
  07/25/12
Explain Ken Rogoff.
sienna bat-shit-crazy lodge voyeur
  07/25/12
Explain To Be Fair.
translucent massive cruise ship reading party
  07/25/12
...
amber bespoke abode black woman
  07/25/12
...
sienna bat-shit-crazy lodge voyeur
  07/25/12
To be fair, Still waiting
Razzmatazz parlor jewess
  07/25/12
Explain one reputable economist who is on the side of Obama'...
sienna bat-shit-crazy lodge voyeur
  07/25/12
...
flesh nighttime corner
  07/25/12
This. You will find almost no economists who think min wage,...
maniacal cracking pit
  07/25/12
TBF: comparative advantage etc etc etc. this isn't a bad poi...
very tactful parlour
  07/25/12
This has been quite the gaping
Talented Mahogany Patrolman
  07/25/12
...
galvanic topaz coldplay fan
  07/25/12
I wanted to slide my dick in but your hole is already so gap...
smoky keepsake machete potus
  07/25/12
...
Razzmatazz parlor jewess
  07/25/12
negative
Poppy Toilet Seat Plaza
  07/25/12
lololololololololololol
Rose exciting theatre
  07/25/12
Explain Paul Krugman
razzle spot depressive
  07/25/12
Link to Paul Krugman advocating one-time tax breaks as stimu...
very tactful parlour
  07/25/12
There's no such thing as a smart partisan. Both parties are ...
boyish sick dilemma national security agency
  07/25/12
Cr
pearl brunch international law enforcement agency
  07/25/12
To be fair, Demonstrably false. There's no such thing ...
Razzmatazz parlor jewess
  07/25/12


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:26 AM
Author: very tactful parlour

How is it that roughly half the country subscribes to an economics model that ALL respected economists have rejected?

I have friends that are conservatives. I have friends that are extremely intelligent conservatives. But even conservative economics (e.g., Friedman's permanent income hypothesis) flatly contradict Republican ideas (e.g., that one-time tax breaks are stimulus).

When two decades of "trickle down" and flatter (and flatter still) tax curves have resulted in two recessions and a near-depression, how can anyone who believes in evidence-based decision-making support the Republican economic platform?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169656)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:50 AM
Author: high-end bipolar stag film psychic

Tax breaks that aren't met with a corresponding spending decrease would be considered a stimulus (in that Y goes up) by pretty much anyone

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169744)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 2:26 AM
Author: Pungent half-breed codepig

not on XOXO that's for sure

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169933)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:27 AM
Author: flesh nighttime corner

yfwgi

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169665)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:30 AM
Author: very tactful parlour

A cogent and thorough response, sir.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169670)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:37 AM
Author: flesh nighttime corner

ur post doesn't warrant a response

"How is it that roughly half the country subscribes to an economics model that ALL respected economists have rejected?"

richard vedder, martin feldstein, greg mankiw, etc? lol at this question

"even conservative economics (e.g., Friedman's permanent income hypothesis) flatly contradict Republican ideas (e.g., that one-time tax breaks are stimulus)."

this is just wrong, plenty of con economists support one-time tax breaks. and one-time tax breaks are mostly political anyway -- reptiles would make them permanent if dems didnt obstruct

"When two decades of "trickle down" and flatter (and flatter still) tax curves have resulted in two recessions and a near-depression, how can anyone who believes in evidence-based decision-making support the Republican economic platform?"

if you think that bush lowering clinton's tax rates on the rich by 3% is the reason are economy sucks then ur just beyond help. lol@ this dailykos/huffpo line of reasoning

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169701)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:39 AM
Author: sienna bat-shit-crazy lodge voyeur

180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169711)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:57 AM
Author: galvanic topaz coldplay fan

pwn pwn pwn

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169765)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 10:44 AM
Author: very tactful parlour

You seriously think Vedder is a "respected" economist? Please. He hasn't had a single original idea in his entire life.

Feldstein is indisputably "respected" - by those who can overlook the fact that he was on the board of AIG when it imploded and took half the world economy with it.

Mankiw is a Keynsian. I am skeptical that he supports the mainstream Republican economic impulse, despite his position on Romney's campaign.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21170811)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 12:48 PM
Author: Razzmatazz parlor jewess

To be fair,

(Random dipshit on the internet, authoritatively dismissing Vedder as a serious economist based on wishful thinking and vague but cherished memories from that 'Introduction to the Economic Perspective on Human Rights' class he took freshman year at Vassar)

*Waits on the edge of my seat for you to reveal that--just like an XO pumo--"ACTUALLY" you have "an advanced degree in economics...!"*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21171706)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 2:19 AM
Author: Coral glittery business firm main people

lol @ this clown college dropout getting destroyed.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169884)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:30 AM
Author: maniacal cracking pit

The vast majority of Republicans are Keynesian and/or neo-classicals, there is minimal difference between Republican and Democrat principles when it comes to economic constructs. Moreover, the whole "trickle-down" schtick was an elaborate false labeling campaign by Dems in the 80s and onward.

No offense, but your knowledge in this area seems to be limited to what you watch on MSNBC.

Edit: Maybe I am a bit harsh on you re: "trickle-down" google that + "Sowell". He makes and then defends the fact that no actually economists made the claims that people associate with the "trickle-down" ideology.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169672)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:33 AM
Author: Glassy Deep Sweet Tailpipe

You are retarded.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169679)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:40 AM
Author: maniacal cracking pit

My response is both pertinent and factually correct. Republican economic policy has the same underlying principles as mainstream neo-classical economics. Moreover, the notion of their being an identifiable advocating of "trickle-down theory" among any political party is totally false (see Sowell).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169713)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 2:26 AM
Author: Poppy Toilet Seat Plaza

tcr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169926)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:32 AM
Author: sienna bat-shit-crazy lodge voyeur

"How is it that roughly half the country subscribes to an economics model that ALL respected economists have rejected?"

Are you insane? Post your garbage on econjobrumors.com, and watch the lulz.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169676)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 9:24 AM
Author: Jade Hospital

funny you recommend someone go post on a site that despises you

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21170460)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:34 AM
Author: sienna bat-shit-crazy lodge voyeur

Explain the 5 Nobel Laureates in economics who wrote in George W. Bush's latest book.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169682)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 10:33 AM
Author: very tactful parlour

Explain your being a pumo

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21170728)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:35 AM
Author: sienna bat-shit-crazy lodge voyeur

Explain Harvard's economics department.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169687)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:35 AM
Author: sienna bat-shit-crazy lodge voyeur

Explain Stanford's economics department.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169689)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:35 AM
Author: sienna bat-shit-crazy lodge voyeur

Explain Ben Bernanke.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169691)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:36 AM
Author: sienna bat-shit-crazy lodge voyeur

Explain Ken Rogoff.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169697)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:38 AM
Author: translucent massive cruise ship reading party

Explain To Be Fair.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169703)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:38 AM
Author: amber bespoke abode black woman



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169704)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:39 AM
Author: sienna bat-shit-crazy lodge voyeur



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169708)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 12:48 PM
Author: Razzmatazz parlor jewess

To be fair,

Still waiting

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21171713)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:39 AM
Author: sienna bat-shit-crazy lodge voyeur

Explain one reputable economist who is on the side of Obama's anti-outsourcing stance.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169706)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:39 AM
Author: flesh nighttime corner



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169709)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:41 AM
Author: maniacal cracking pit

This. You will find almost no economists who think min wage, protectionist policies, etc, are actually anything but harmful.

Not to say Repubs don't share similarly retarded stances.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169722)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 10:32 AM
Author: very tactful parlour

TBF: comparative advantage etc etc etc. this isn't a bad point. that said, Obama is concerned about the American economy, not the global one. and min wage etc. are IMO more social policy issues than economics issues.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21170714)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:47 AM
Author: Talented Mahogany Patrolman

This has been quite the gaping

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169736)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 1:58 AM
Author: galvanic topaz coldplay fan



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169768)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 2:24 AM
Author: smoky keepsake machete potus

I wanted to slide my dick in but your hole is already so gaped I wouldn't feel anything, so I'm masturbating instead.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169918)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 12:49 PM
Author: Razzmatazz parlor jewess



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21171717)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 2:25 AM
Author: Poppy Toilet Seat Plaza

negative

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21169925)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 9:22 AM
Author: Rose exciting theatre

lololololololololololol

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21170451)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 9:29 AM
Author: razzle spot depressive

Explain Paul Krugman

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21170482)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 10:33 AM
Author: very tactful parlour

Link to Paul Krugman advocating one-time tax breaks as stimulus and a less-progressive tax system?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21170724)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 9:41 AM
Author: boyish sick dilemma national security agency

There's no such thing as a smart partisan. Both parties are utter shit.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21170521)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 10:38 AM
Author: pearl brunch international law enforcement agency

Cr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21170767)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2012 12:49 PM
Author: Razzmatazz parlor jewess

To be fair,

Demonstrably false.

There's no such thing as a wise partisan, however.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004177&forum_id=2#21171719)